Sorry for the shit quality anons, I took the picture with my phone. Anyways, I think I saw a ufo last night.
>>17677435
Ok, and what makes this say to you "oh its a ufo"
Is there some other feature that we can't see in the photo other one single light? I occsionally see these around my house, but those are just passing by planes.
>Sorry for the shit quality anons, I took the picture with my phone
This was a good excuse ten years ago, before high-quality cameras weren't a normal feature even for cheap phones.
>>17677435
>>17677696
>I understand how distance affects quality in images.
>I understand that cameras on phones are meant to work optimally in good, see bright, light.
You're an idiot. High quality and phone camera are still mutually exclusive, especially in a low light situation. Mega-pixels do not equate to a perfect machine capable of clarity in any situation. A high end camera see professional grade does not equate to the 'hd' camera in a phone. It's pretty much snake-oil in most cases.
That said, even in poor quality this hardly justifies a sighting.
>>17677435
how is this a ufo?
>>17678826
>try to troll OP
>troll a photography autist instead
Better than nothing, I guess.
>>17678851
I think i know what OP thinks this UFO is. A satellite flying thru the sky.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9TvKQVN290
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOsOifg4Mm0
