How can you go back in time? Any spells or theories? What do you think?
>>17661609
Take a hit of this shit and you'll fly through time.
>>17661620
Thx boi. But seriously iS THEREANYWAAYICANGOBACK???
You need to break the speed of light to exit the dimensions we exist in, which is impossible due to the limitations of the human body
>>17661640
Damn>:(
>>17661640
>which is impossible due to the limitations of the human body
that you know of.
There's a few methods. The easiest and at this point in time the most plausible is freezing yourself. Downsides are you'll probably die, and you can't choose how far into the future you go. Upsides are if you are un-thawed at some time in the future the civilization that brings you back to life will most likely be a utopia of some sort. If you want to become an astronaut and think you can get NASA to allow a space ship to fly around the sun, you'll be able to jump ahead a few hours due to theory (now law) of relativity. Time moves slower relative to mass, so as you pass the sun time will move more quickly on earth, and once you return you could be up to a year in the future while only being in space a couple of months. Alternatively, you could fly around a black hole for increased results. If you cant become an astronaut, go to a super-heavy monument like the pyramids of giza. Time moves a microsecond slower as you are beside them, so as you walk away you'll be a few microseconds in the future. That's all you can really do right now, since we don't have access to wormholes and aren't really certain where black holes lead. Another poster mentioned the usage of the speed of light, which is one theoretical method. Another is the use of anti-matter to expand aforementioned wormholes from their microscopic size to allow for the entrance of an individual, but that is again theoretical.
Also, if you are interested in the slowing down of your perception of time, try the reading about the sigil "fotamecus." It's probably bullshit, but try it anyway.
>>17661703
Thanks and will do!
>>17661703
Nice blogpost on time dilation and Einstein–Rosen theory, but the question was how to travel into the past, not the future.
>>17661794
With present technology it's not physically possible, without of course the theoretical use of antimatter and wormholes. Even such, time travel to the past would be unwise unless one simply wished to view previous events without change. Changing something in the past creates a paradox of intent, if you change what you wished to change then it didn't need changing so you never went back to change it so it needs changing etc etc. That is unless of course you think of time as a river with tributaries, in which case change simply creates a separate tributary and once you enter the future you enter the future of the new tributary and not the one you are from. This then creates a duplicate of yourself, another issue altogether.
Spells and "magic" cannot precipitate time travel. It simply isn't possible. It's like asking a Wiccan / witch to transform you into a dog or some other animal. It can't be done because that's not how real "magic" works. Real "magic" is simply a complex set of placebos that alter the mind's perception, from which you get things like "love spells" "money spells" "health spells" etc. it's all guff that plays upon the power of positive suggestion, and doesn't alter the fabric of reality in any way.
This being said, you could try contacting a djinn for a wish to time travel. The only methods I've found for allegedly contacting them were on shady 2004 forums with no source in the Hadith or Quran, so it's probably garbage anyway. Djinn themselves most likely don't exist, but you could try contacting them anyway just to give it a shot.
You could also try reading about the New Age "theology" wherein one can create a spiritual transportation device, a merkaba, that allows them to travel through space and time.
>>17661857
Also astral projection allegedly allows for time travel if done right, but you observe from a third person perspective and astral projection as a concept is more or less lucid dreaming so your probably just seeing images you yourself created.
Enlightenment in various eastern religions like Taoism allows for time travel, as unity with the Tao allows for intimate connection with the movement of space time.
>>17661857
>That is unless of course you think of time as a river with tributaries, in which case change simply creates a separate tributary and once you enter the future you enter the future of the new tributary and not the one you are from. This then creates a duplicate of yourself, another issue altogether.
So rather than working on causality, I assume it would transport you to a new quantum state seperate from the one you came, wherein the butterfly effect would be viable?
>>17661632
WE HAVE TO GO BACK, KATE
Read MJ Youngs writings on temporal theory. It's on his website. Interesting stuff.
>>17661875
>>17661875
Not sure what you mean. The first bit is correct, a new quantum state, but I don't understand the butterfly effect bit. If you mean the idea that your small change will create a chain reaction of changes resulting in a new reality, then yes. Any small change you make in the past will cause drastic changes in the future, (if you assume the "time as a river" idea) the reason being that such changes influence human thought. When someone thinks differently they take different actions, and when they take different actions different events take place that diverge from what originally took place.
>>17663104
Yeah that's what I was getting at. It's an interesting thought exercise if nothing else.
It disappointes me that no real story has delved into time travel as a concept competently barr maybe primer.
Look at doctor who or back to the future, their time travel rules are either inconsistent or mix-match concepts.
>>17661857
Woof woof nonbeliever >:3 Thanks for the info! Have a good day!
>>17661703
>since we don't have access to wormholes and aren't really certain where black holes lead.
that you know of.
>>17661857
>theoretical use of antimatter
Not animatter. Exotic matter.
Antimatter with an average negative energy density is not the same as antimatter, which has a positive energy density.
What if you travel faster than the sun to the opposite of the suns direction
>don't know if this'll work I'm too tired to think
>>17661609
Déjà vu. Think about it, how many times have you seen it? How many times do you intend to see it?
>>17661632
No.
Time has no direction, nor is it "real". It's an evolution of state. Changes can't be undone. "The past" is simply referring to a previous state, not an actual place.
>>17661640
You hit on it. Entering a blackhole results in being squeezed into a cord composed of electrons which is one particle thick.
This happens for the same reason you get pushed back in your seat when you push the gas peddle. That is, the car and your body have several so-called states - such as vector and velocity.
The speed of sound is the speed at which the material transfers the vector and velocity states from the car to your body. This speed can be infinite, or even negative;
>http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/apl/90/1/10.1063/1.2423240
>Sound beyond the speed of light: Measurement of negative group velocity in an acoustic loop filter
As you jump feet first into the blackhole, you get squeezed because of the difference in acceleration between your feet and head. For this to happen, there has to be a lag between your feet and your head - if both accelerate equally at the same time, you don't get squeezed.
This is also what's going on here;
>http://m.phys.org/news/2014-01-theory-teleport-energy-distances.html#fontsize
>New theory suggests way to teleport energy long distances
So basically, you need a quantum shock-absorbing system, and we actually already have the technology.
>>17661691
I think you could stick this shock-absorbing system into a human, or into a super body made of a fluorine-guanine skin, aerographene muscles, strontium bones, and the inclusion-body remnants of your nervous system.
Once you enter a blackhole there's no escaping the singularity, no matter how fast you travel.
Joining two blackholes with an ER bridge doesn't create a "wormhole" which you can pass through, it creates two entangled black holes. Yes, two people could jump in and meet in the middle, but again, there's no escaping the singularity.
>>17664318
You don't have to enter the singularity to experience powerful contraction or expansion events;
>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AAS...22720207T
>ALMA Reveals a Galaxy-Scale Fountain of Cold Molecular Gas Pumped by a Black Hole
>https://www.sciencenews.org/article/black-hole-extreme-recycler?mode=magazine&context=466
As the matter enters this blackhole, it goes back in time. When it gets shot out, it goes forward in time. The past is away from the blackhole, while the future is toward it.
Also, this picture depicts a newer conception of wormholes, where the exit of the wormhole is composed of many particles coming from the entrance.
Also, the singularity is kind of a dead concept. Can't get permanently sucked into something that doesn't exist.
>>17661640
Mario can do it tho. Even with an 0.5 A press
>>17661691
>>17663737
Ok then why don't you contribute something useful?
>>17661703
Back in time, not foward, JESUS CHRIST
>>17664636
You're wrong and your theory is stupid.
