Where should I start in the study of Alchemy?
>>17645344
16th century and move forward.
Good luck going past the 18th century you lazy fuck.
http://www.alchemywebsite.com/texts.html
Begin and end with Jung. Truly one of the greatest memegicians.
>>17645419
You need to read the older writings that Jung drew from to fully understand the context of his work
>>17645424
Given the shortsightedness and laziness of people wanting to study this kind of stuff, you have to give them the magnum opus to start with. They'll start with what Jung read and not understand it at all because they're not Jung. If they're interested in the topic, they can then work their way back.
>>17645428
What if they did understand it, what then?
>>17645463
I'm not talking about those people. Everyone should be familiar with Jung, especially the people that can't be bothered to read through old sources. Instead of being a hardo and telling people to read a bunch of texts that aren't as synthesized as Jung's, I'll recommend that you start with Jung.
I realize I may come across as lazy not stating anything of value in the OP, but that is the reason I am addressing the anons of /x/. You're far more experienced in the fields of the occult leading me to believe you'd be the perfect audience to ask.
I'm not looking for something awfully understandable and relatable, just a name/text/etc that could serve as a block upon which I will continue to build in future.
>>17645344
Here mother fuker
>>17645478
>You're far more experienced in the fields of the occult leading me to believe you'd be the perfect audience to ask.
This is where you failed. Assume noone knows anything.
http://bookzz.org/book/652334/8de0b7
>>17645522
>Hebrew
>>17645528
Taoist internal alchemy and Franz Bardon. Stay away from anything jewish.
>>17645654
>Franz Bardon
>put in a Nazi concentration camp
wew
You should check out the mages' college in Winterhold
>>17645344
>Where should I start in the study of Alchemy?
You don't. You study Chemistry, derp. Chemistry arose from Alchemy because it's VALID, and Alchemy is not.
>>17645775
I feel obliged to warn anons that this will literally kill you.
I let you down darwin.
>>17645528
Good lad. I'm glad /x/ is learning.
>>17646119
You do realize that alchemy was the forerunner of psychology right?
>>17646119
Pretty much this. Alchemy is basically pointless. Chemistry beats it in...well...chemistry and all its magical claims are fraudulent like homunculi.
>>17645344
you go into the wilderness and meditate on these words: Zen wa ichi; ichi wa zen
>ουράβόρος
>>17646125
Why you do this.....
>>17646517
Dude, c'mon. Anyone who has ever cleaned a floor knows not to do that. lol
>>17645528
>he doesn't realise we can use jew magic against them
>>17645528
good luck delving into a good number of texts without it.
>>17649937
Such as?
>>17645492
>performing alchemy in metal cookware
el oh el
>>17645492
Wrong.
Step 1:Study Fulcanelli and The Compass of the Wise.
Step 2: Do not trust the mundanes that say alchemy is just internal or the bluepills that say it's just proto chemistry
????
Transmute Mercury into Gold!
Library to peruse: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/uldbxpm2nyw7a
>>17650591
And have this image for ENLIGHTENMENT
>>17645492
What is this supposed to do?
