explain the fucking giza necropolis.
this shit was built over 4000 years ago and no one knows how. their purpose is completely opaque although clearly they were built for some arcane religious purpose. But why, how and for whom?
The pyramids of Giza and others are thought to have been constructed to house the remains of the deceased Pharaohs who ruled over Ancient Egypt.[3] A portion of the Pharaoh's spirit called his ka was believed to remain with his corpse. Proper care of the remains was necessary in order for the "former Pharaoh to perform his new duties as king of the dead." It's theorized the pyramid not only served as a tomb for the Pharaoh, but also as storage for the various items he would need in the afterlife. "The people of Ancient Egypt believed that death on Earth was the start of a journey to the next world. The embalmed body of the King was entombed underneath or within the pyramid to protect it and allow his transformation and ascension to the afterlife."[9]
>fucking google it faggot goddamn
>>17558793
there is zero evidence that the giza necropolis was built to house dead pharaohs, although some later pyramids in the middle kingdom were used as tombs that was never the purpose of the original old kingdom super pyramids.
>>17558779
Eh its a tomb for pharaohs, first grade kids know that.
Fallen Angel worship
>>17558779
Why not ask /his/ or something? /x/ doesn't know shit about history.
>>17558818
>implying /his knows anything about history other than nazis
>>17558822
Eh, that's true. It's basically just /pol/ light.
>>17558805
>Citation needed
Because acording to the Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Egypt the pyramid was built as a tomb for the cheop dynasty.
Necropolis also means "city of the dead" in greek
>>17558901
there is no mention of cheop on any part of the great pyramid except for a few discarded blocks with the name of the slave groups that made them on it
Also doesn't explain the other pyramids.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/data/2001/11/01/html/ft_20011101.5.fulltext.html
>>17558779
fucking slavery
and look at it now, in ruins
same thing will happen to America
>>17558936
You're so deep and rebellious.
>>17558779
as has been repeatedly stated already, the pyramids at giza were never tombs.
in fact, the whole 'these were the tombs of the pharoas' argument falls flat once the fact emerges that NOT ONE SINGLE BODY HAS EVER BEEN FOUND IN A PYRAMID.
further bullshit can be found when examining the great pyramid itself, who scholars claim was built in only 20 years.
it is constructed of roughly 2.3 million stones of varying weights and dimensions. in order for it to have been built in the amount of time claimed, a stone would have to have been hewn, transported, fitted and placed every two minutes for twenty years straight.
the real nugget of all this is that it shows exactly how little these 'scholars' actually know about ancient egypt, and how much of their work is based on pure and simple spit-balling
>>17558992
graham please go
>>17558919
Okay the workers weren't slaves, so?.
The article always refers the pramid as a tomb, and the khufu or cheops dysnasty is still the one most probable as the one the tomb was built for.
The other were tombs too for the same dynasty (4ft one) just for diferent phraohs.
>>17559003
explain how the 4th dynasty pharaohs who lived over 4000 year ago had the resources to build like 4 + HUGE EPIC PYRAMIDS
>>17558992
What even in the aricle mentioned the first they found is wooden sarcophagus
They never found bodies inside becuase the pyramides were raided uncountable times, but they found lots of cofins and sarcophagus inside the pyramids
>>17558997
i notice there is no refuting argument?
pity, i bet it would be ylyl worthy
>>17559003
please explain why all this effort was expended to erect these tombs, and then not actually be interred in it?
>>17559033
you are really not very bright, eh?
there are no coffins. there is a large box in the "kings chamber" of the great pyramid, that is fashioned to exacting measurements and angles out of rose granite which is referred to as a sarcophagus.
that.is.it
you really should do some actual reading on the subject instead of a cursory google search and then spouting whatever little snippet you read first.
I can't imagine what could have compelled the Egyptians to build these fuckers. It took such a goddamn long time and they look stupid as fuck. They don't even seem to serve any useful purpose.
Did ancient Egyptians all have autism?
>>17559033
>hey guise, let's raid the pyramid!
>gets inside, only takes mummies
yeah, i imagine those mummies fetched top-dollar back in those days... definitely more than the precious metals, gems, art and craftwork!
i know i just said this a minute ago, but it really needs repeating;
you are really not very bright, eh?
>>17559068
>look stupid as fuck
other than the fact that the things have been standing through thousands of years, are nearly geometrically perfect, aligned almost perfectly with the cardinal directions, and are located on the exact center of the earth's land mass.... so yeah, i guess they are stupid
but not as stupid as you
Apparently Strabo knew about the entrance of the pyramid, but I'm not clear if he saw the Grand Galley or the King's Chamber.
Abdullah Al Mamum, the Caliph of Cairo in 813AD is the first recorded example that I could find of someone actually exploring Grand Gallery and King's chamber.
What always bothers me about this is that people always focus on the great pyramid but never talk about the OTHER TWO HUGE FUCKING pyramids right beside them!
>>17559099
They look stupid as fuck
>>17559016
>>17559050
Egypt was the principal empire at the time, it had the resources and human power to do it, also the builders were people doing his job (builders build thing for other people in exchange of food and other things, since we already settled down they weren't slaves).
I don't see what is so hard to belive of all this, if you want to disprove any of the avobe please present your proof, I already said my information comes from (Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Egypt)
There is lots of information on how they possibly moved the stones and other subjects, maybe it's not 100% I could check other egyptology aproved sources but I'm lazy.
Anyways the only citation I got dosen't support anything OP said in his original post.
>>17559085
>gets inside, only takes mummies
Never said by anyone, they took everything they wanted.
>>17559152
Maybe it's not 100% acurate,*
Sorry I ate that part for some reason.
>>17559099
>standing through thousands of years
big rocks tend to do that
>nearly geometrically perfect
my toilet is nearly geometrically perfect you faggot
>aligned almost perfectly with the cardinal directions
that's nice
>located on the exact center of the earth's land mass
yep, that's where Egypt happens to be located
>>17559122
I bet you look stupid as fuck.
Post pics or you lose
>>17559180
This is me you dumbass
>>17559122
you're that special kind of retarded, eh?
>>17559196
>Dodging like a fag
Didn't see that coming
>>17559172
no one ever talks about the Dashur pyramids
good job ancient architects
>5000 years ago.
>have resources to build epic stone collosus
>build it half way
>oops it gonna fall over.
>mfw
>>17559199
As far as I know, I am NOT of Egyptian descent
>>17559152
so, stupid, listless and without a sense of humor.
okay, now i realize i have been wasting my time with a fucking buffoon who can't think for himself.
>okthford dithonary guise
did you not read the parts about WHY mainstream scholars have this shit wrong?
>>17558936
Same thing will happen to the 'United States', not America.
>>17559066
What the fuck?
In fucking article someone citated as his "source" for al of this nosense about the pyramids not being tombs the first fucking thing they found when they entered inside the pyramid was a wooden cofin.
>>17559217
No refuting argument?, just calling me stupid?
Thanks for replying I guess
>>17559172
oh look, another brain-dead simpleton with no simple reasoning skills.
aligned with the cardinal directions is a big deal, shitbird, considering it wasn't until the nineteenth century that WE could do the same thing egyptians had done thousands of years prior.
we are not talking about egypt being the center of the earth's land mass, gilbert. the great pyramid of egypt is located at that exact point.
so no, it didnt just happen to be there.
did your mother have any children that lived, el capitano of the abortion bucket escapees?
I love when someone posts a subject saying "let's talk about xxxx" but anyone who dares to talk about the subject is immediately shot down by the OP. Just post your fucking Ancient Aliens Pyramid Airport screed and be done with it.
>>17559210
>implying the bent pyramids weren't built that way on purpose
god, you are awfully fucking stupid
>>17559239
Is this guy the egyptian equivalent to a weeb?
>>17559234
look pally, i already a few reasons why scholars have it wrong, or their current ideas are illogical.
i have yet to hear your reasoning why what ive posted is wrong.
ill not jump through your hoops till you've jumped through mine... that is how a tête–à–tête works, assdick
now cry about it if you want to, sweet little lemming, but if you are too sensitive for adult banter, maybe you should GET THE FUCK OUT
>>17559241
dont you have an election to lose, shillary?
>There have been human remains recovered from Djoser’s underworld, and at least one mummy was, oddly enough, older than Djoser by several generations. It is possible that, along with family heirlooms, Djoser may have had some of his ancestor relocated to his pyramid complex. Another explanation is that the builders accidentally tunneled into older pre-existing tombs.
What is with these niggas they always have to have their huge ass tomb complexes WTF thinking about the terracotta army of Qin Shi Hung Di
>>17559246
all you do is call people stupid. yet you don't seem to know anything.
>>17559281
stop being stupid, and ill stop telling the truth about you being stupid, stupid.
>>17559239
"Cambyses II, knowing the veneration the Egyptians held for cats, had the image of Bastet painted on his soliders' shields and, further, "ranged before his front line dogs, sheep, cats, ibeses and whatever other animals the Egyptians hold dear" (Polyaenus). The Egyptians under Psammenitus, seeing their own beloved goddess on the shields of enemies, and fearing to fight lest they injure the animals being driven before their foe, surrendered their position and took flight in a rout. Many were massacred on the field."
"It is said that Cambyses, after the battle, hurled cats into the faces of the defeated Egyptians in scorn that they would surrender their country and their freedom fearing for the safety of common animals."
>Egyptians
>>17559287
>LOL STUPID AGAIN
pretty clearly the pyramids were built as tombs, look at the development of pyramids from Dashur and Djoser that clearly show them getting more elaborate and complex until the giza necropolis.
>>17559239
Wrong again and spreadin missinformation
The geographical center of all land surfaces on Earth is at trukey (39 N 34 E), some astronomer tried to make it the pyramid of giza "becuase of his cultural significance.
>>17559266
No, just a guy who watched a youtube video about "secrets of ancient egypt"
>>17559294
you can go on with that shit all you like, but every ancient megalithic site on this earth is just like giza in that the largest stones are the most precisely cut and placed, with roughshod work being done after on top of and around the original structure.
this holds true for the pyramids as well, the step pyramids made of the small bricks were made after the giza complex in an attempt to mimic a knowledge and know-how that had been forgotten.
at least try to fake having some critical thinking and problem solving skills, will ya?
>>17559296
>goes to wikipedia
>claims misinformation
get the fuck out, junior and let the grown folk talk
>>17559326
that apparently you wasted your time on.
carl munck's 'the code' is what got me interested.
i come from a generation where we werent a bunch of spoon fed nancy-boys who thought that looking up someone else's work and then parroting it made us educated
it's really as if critical thinking and extrapolation are things no longer valued by today's educational system
I personally believe the pyramids were repurposed as tombs after a few thousand years of being.
Look up the alignment of the shaftways with known constellations. Look in to the possible waterway transportation of the stone blocks; it's hard to imagine but there is evidence to suggest using waterways and special buoying techniques made the movement of the blocks far easier than overland.
I don't have any of my sourcebooks with me, they're all back home, but there is some truly fascinating analysis of the design behind the pyramids at Giza.
Also the sphinx is truly spooky; was very possibly carved by water currents, and finished by a civilization predating the egyptions.
>>17559342
>the step pyramids made of the small bricks were made after the giza complex in an attempt to mimic a knowledge and know-how that had been forgotten.
Tell me more. So how do you know what the real dating of the construction of the giza necropolis is?
>>17559016
Fanatic religion...
>>17559389
>I personally believe the pyramids were repurposed as tombs after a few thousand years of being.
yes, agreed. and infinitely more probable than building it for one fucking guy, and then not even burying him in it
>>17559391
>inb4 they line up with stars 20,000 years ago
>>17559267
No you don't, this is what happened and I'm just quoting our conversation:
>Before this point someone spew "facts" with no proof and a "citation" that dosen't supports any of this nosense
>>17559016
>>17559050
>You asked me how the pharaohs built the pyramids
>>17559152
>answered
>>17559217
>You called me and all the scholars stupid
Thats all
>>17559068
>>17559068
Its a metaphorical game of my dicks bigger than your dick
its like rich people who buy big boats and houses just to say mines bigger than yours
>>17559353
Yeah because Ayystory channel and the tinfoil infromation is much better than wikipedia
>>17559389
They would float the stones on channels of liquid mercury, then dumped it in the ocean or buried it deep under the pyramid in a big well, at least thats my theory on how the south americans did it with their pyramids they did find a river of mercury or whatever under one
>>17559398
I think since people were feeling the Tutankhamen hype back in the day, every 'archaeologist' wanted to get their name in the books and thereby projected the 'fabulously wealthy mummy' mystery on to the pyramids.
If we decided to go back and individually check up on every proclaimed egyptologist's experiences in Egypt, I'd bet there would be very few of them that had actually even been to the Pyramids. The dimensional analysis they all discuss is based off of 1 or 2 half-asses surveys done in the 30s.
Analyzing many fields, especially ones without devout empiricism, one might find much academic dishonesty.
>>17559402
Didn't they? I might need to brush up again, but I believe they had some stellar significance.
remember: "Mainstream" scholars are all STUPID and in a giant conspiracy to cover up the TRUTH that the giza pyramids and sphinx were built ten thousand years ago!
>>17559391
first, nobody knows much of anything about when exactly the giza complex was built. we guess at it, but as there is no surviving documentation regarding its construction, it is all we can do.
you can make comparisons of this yourself by looking up images of these megalithic sites, and at each one you will see the giant, perfectly fitted stones, with smaller stone or brick constructions on top.
everyone agrees the larger method is superior, because it's irregular faceting makes the structure almost completely earthquake proof.
if i have the ability to make a building that can withstand an earthquake, why in the world would i change techniques later on to a construction that falls like a house of cards?
this whole subject we are talking about is a giant rabbit hole, and nothing has a simple answer... however, after researching all these megalithic sites for myself, the preponderance of evidence shows quite clearly that the theories being peddled by archeologists simply don't hold water.
>>17559239
Haha I love you. I mainly lurk, so kudos to you for pulling out a comment from me.
Also, they were energy generators. Of what type, most are unsure however they were built right over quarries. The limestone was so precisely measured that you STILL TO THIS DAY, cannot get a razor blade in between two slabs of it on the outside. (Parts that aren't weathered as badly of course). It also encased pink granite and other excellent electrical insulators and some physicists say that when fully powered, the pyramids would glow. This is the theory I'm most convinced is correct, or at least close to the truth as possible. Think of it in an anthropological sense; what do we humans tend to do when we have vast populations over a crowded area? Seek out renewable and reliable energy sources. We come together and build astronomical dams, windmills, wind turbines, etc. Why couldn't the ancient Egyptians be capable of the same thing? What if they had a better intuition on how to encapsulate power and distribute it to the masses, but in a more archaic manner that we don't fully understand? Fucking open your minds people.
>>17559239
>we are not talking about egypt being the center of the earth's land mass, gilbert. the great pyramid of egypt is located at that exact point.
by what reckoning? the Earth is a sphere
>>17559454
power for what, their ibisPhones?
>>17559419
The issue with that theory is the procurement of that much mercury. An easier solution would be hay bales and animal skins inflated and attached to the blocks, and then floating them up a water channel similar to a mineshaft from a lower aqueduct to a higher one just next to the pyramid
>>17559447
>giza
*20,000 years ago
>>17559403
and again, you have done nothing other than spout someone else's work, instead of applying your intellect (which you assure me is not stupid) and drawing your own conclusions.
i suspect the reason is because you have poor cognitive ability (you're stupid).
get all that, stupid, or do i need to go get the construction paper and crayons?
>>17559419
...could this theoretically work? Ability to harvest said mercury aside
I am half egyptian.
Can confirm, my family built these things by thinking so hard their thoughts became piramids.
Luminaty confirm too.
>>17559417
>implying i watch television
>complaining about tinfoil on /x/
wow, you're a real second grade spelling bee champion, im sure
>>17559444
oh sweet jesus, you goddamned prince amongst men! finally, an abstract thinker!
yes, and yes to the many-discipline approach
>>17559468
Density of mercury is like 13.5 g/cm^3, density of limestone is 3 g/cm^3 so hypothetically if you had a deep enough channel that you could get your blocks in to, they would float.
But back in real-land, you can't get that much mercury in one place even today.
But maybe I am wrong, we haven't excavated the terra-cotta emperor's tomb yet. There's supposed to be a river of mercury in there
>>17559465
So you get your from direct source, you have been on giza pyramids and studied them for years or what?, or you get your information from air.
Everyone uses others work from diferent sources and gets their own conclusions thats using cognitive ability,
Dude I'm going to stop repliying this is not even bad bait at this point you are just ashaming yourself.
>>17559460
Do I seriously need to answer such a daft question
>>17559474
>My information is fact becuase but yours don't
Please redpill
>>17559454
aww, shucks!
the piezoelectric generation/capacitance theory makes a lot of sense to me as well. especially when i found out the entire giza plateau has a giant aquifer underneath it... much of which is probably man-made
although i am still more in the camp of "i dont know what they were for, all i know is they aren't tombs"
>>17559480
Haha good to hear from you. I wouldn't call myself smarter than the average chan user, but yeah thinking laterally about this kind of thing is one of my strong suits. My dad imparted the importance of that when I was younger, and actually got me interested in egypt.
>>17559496
He's convinced because some autistic freemason told him about THE CODE
If you're autistic enough to watchbcarl monk PROVE that all megalithic sites are built by Atlantians and the lost tribe of Israel you too can learn The Truth the mainstream morons don't want you to know
https://youtu.be/Xw9lTB0hTNU
>>17559456
the center of the earth's LAND MASS
if i have to spell this out for you, we are most likely not going to be able to have a conversation you will enjoy
>>17559487
Yeah that was alot better answer than I was expecting thank you, but it could be there was a massive mercury deposit within reach, I know i heard somewhere they already used a form of mercury for like lipstick or something I supposed if they dumped it all in the ocean it could be the reason fish are so tainted with mercury as far fetched as it seems its just odd that I keep hearing about pools or rivers of mercury or even just use of mercury in civilizations that have big ass tombs and monolithic structures
>>17559461
ive seen this theory doped out in animation form, and it does seem to be very plausible.
>>17559507
Haha indeed, I'm on the same boat in terms of opinion. This is the only theory I really enjoy delving into because it makes so much sense to me. Fucking mind blowing someone else has read up on it.
>>17559454
Why they don't glow anymore?
The rocks are the pretty much the same and acording to the tread they didn't move a inch
>>17559518
said mercury mexico pyramid
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/24/liquid-mercury-mexican-pyramid-teotihuacan
>>17559496
good, i don't have time for dullards
ill just be here busy ashaming myself, and being content that im not a stupid fucking twat like you
>>17559085
Mummies were ground up and used as medicine. True story. Quackery.
>>17559512
You're being sarcastic right?
>>17559534
To really prove that you know the Truth make sure to call everyone a stupid twat and pretend to be too important to explain anything while posting on fucking 4chan.
Dude you are a living joke
>>17559528
I assume not all of the functioning parts would survive the greed of mankind after becoming besieged so many times. However the pyramid's chambers are harmonically tuned, so perhaps that has something to offer in terms of an answer. It's not all about coils and wires, but vibrations and sound can be incredibly powerful if harnessed correctly.
>>17559547
So will a sustained flatulence performed at the right place inside the pyramid cause an earthquake or tsunami?
>>17559539
I don't have time to explain anything to stupid twat dollars lame stream "archeologists" like you. If only you had a tenth of my titantic intellectual capacity you could watch muncks four part series on YouTube.
>>17559518
I should hope there would be some objective study of the ground composition nearby.
On mercury poisoning of the oceans and such, I think that has to do more with bioaccumulation; or tiny amounts of mercury getting absorbed by the littlest creatures and then being absorbed by each critter higher on the food chain. That's why tuna are more prone to mercury accumulation than some other fish: they're at the near top of their food chain.
>>17559520
I think I've seen that as well. I read of the theory in a book a couple years back, I hope it's correct because it seems quite reasonable.
>>17559512
well, i didnt stake a whole claim based on what i learned watching carl munck.
i did what a thinking person does, i began looking at all the information i could get my hands on, and then made a few visits to sites on my own continent (im not made outta money people) and starting formulating my own opinions and ideas.
carl had some wackiness, no doubt, but his mathematics are spot on, and demonstrable.
freemasonry and crap like it do not interest me, but it is interesting how a normally very slow board is suddenly alight with naysayers.
so which of you are going to man the fuck up and admit you are posting for money right now?
>>17559569
I'm being paid to post this.
>>17558992
Your math is off on the 1 stone every 2 minutes.
1440 minutes every day, 365 days a year, 20 years
1440x365x20=10,512,000 minutes over 20 years
10,512,000÷2,300,000=4.57 minutes per stone.
Or you could do the rough amount of stones they needed to place a day over 20 years.
365x20=7,300
2,300,000÷7,300=315 stones per day.
Depending on the number of workers it is completely feasible that they could complete it in 20 years, seeing as there would be different work sections doing every part of the job (workers transporting while others cut the stones, finished stones moved into position and placed by the next group. Then as that group headed for another stone the next group would be moving their stone into position, so on and so forth until whatever time they were given to rest).
>>17559575
Interestingly, the two largest pyramids were actually built simultaneously.
>>17559555
Actually, no. However if I aim correctly and with enough force, I might be able to split your head clean open with an ax without getting much blood on my drapes. Like a fucking coconut. I'll be practicing, baby. Mmm.
>>17559534
You have been a namefag all this time?,
How I got baited this hard ?
Good for you Akhenaten you made me laugh at the end
>>17559579
Tldr they represent the twins castor and pollux
>>17559461
>The issue with that theory is the procurement of that much mercury.
Hello? Did you read? THEY HAD A RIVER OF MERCURY.
>>17559525
chris dunn's generator theory is also pretty interesting.
it also helps that dunn specifically states he is not in the business of making theories about the sites he examines, he simply records and reports physical data and measurements.
>>17559537
>who wants to snort a rail of ramses II?
>>17559598
This fucking guy
http://www.gizapower.com/
>the faces are symmetrical that I'd impossible!
http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Technologies-Ancient-Egypt-Engineering/dp/1591431026/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1263221921&sr=1-1
>>17559574
Well at least you're an honest shill.
>>17559582
The edginess of a 9gagger attached to the stupidity of an /x/ poster.
Nice.
>>17559593
Is this bait? I'm sorry, I didn't see the part where there was a gargantuan river of pure mercury spanning the distance from the nearest limestone quarry to the pyramid site that happened to not leave a single trace along the way. I'm open to radical ideas but that's pushing it
>>17559598
My sentiments exactly. A non-biased, physical report is what people need in order to find answers but few will ever go that route. Especially with the kind of iron grip on these sites the Egyptian government has.
>>17559626
>implying Chris dunn isn't a hack
http://margaretmorrisbooks.com/giza_power_plant_meltdown.html
>>17559543
ill be sure to tell my smoking hot wife what a goddamned joke i am.
im sure that as soon as i do, she will leave her lexus keys and bankbook on the table and walk straight the fuck out.
here in about fifteen minutes when i go to bed, when i cuddle up to her ass and start to get hard ill slip it into her asshole and pretend it is you, you fucking faggot
>>17559631
This is seriously interesting, thank you for the rebuttal.
But what if he isn't a hack? I hope not
>>17559641
Protip: make sure to talk about your smoking hot wife on 4chan/x that will gaurentee people that you are legit
Make CERTAIN you follow this up by bragging about your Lexus and how rich you are. That will assure people you are a totally serious and impartial scholar.
Lastly, state openly that you fantasize about gay anal sex. this will demonstrate your lasting commitment to seeking out THE TRUTH.
>>17559629
>photograph of a modern man
>compared to a stylized glorification of an ancient ruler
>expecting the similarities to stick
Welcome to Shiggles McDiggles, home of the Digglesburger
>>17559619
I try to change shit up, thanks.
>>17559651
I saw him on some other munk video where munk stated that he was a freemason. So I'm pretty sure they're in cohoots in someway although I can't prove this.
>>17559629
Who cares? His skin may have been dark but just like Somalians he is Caucasian. West Africans (The ones African Americans come from) are Negroes.
>>17559660
You done okay m8. I'm just interested in a reasonable discussion on actual factual shia leb- the pyramids.
>>17559583
i don't know how you got baited this hard, but an hero and regain your honor
>>17559666
Holy shit, doubly interesting. Now I gotta find a YouTube video of this. What would they gain?
>>17559666
I think this is the video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwswTDvwMKw
>>17559682
I'm not sure, but I think Freemasons are just obsessed with this shit because you know, they're masons. It explains why they spend SO MUCH autism seeking out clues and shit about ancient stone structures.
>>17559629
i wasnt aware that they had mapped his dna yet
>>17559676
I've been contributing a good discussion I believe...
Some evidence here for ya.
>>17559547
>>17559454
>>17559668
>His skin may have been dark but just like Somalians he is Caucasian
Somalians are not caucasians. They non-Bantu but they're still niggers.
>>17559684
Thank you!
>>17559656
if the truth is at the mouth of your colon buddy, im all about it right now.
so long as you dont mind me probing the truth with my dong
ive never seen anyone this butthurt over being called stupid before. are you crying yet?
dont say its tears of rage either, we all know its loneliness and lack of exposure to sunlight
>>17559699
http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2012-01-01.pdf
>>17559691
The autism thing got a chuckle out of me, so see you in hell buddy. But I get where you're coming from. It seems those fuckers are everywhere trying to debunk ancient secrets. I might join and spill all their secrets.
>>17559716
I'm basically marveling at your dedication to committing nothing useful to this discussion at all.
>>17559513
the land masses are all over the Earth and they're not in any kind of pattern, so what do you mean or are you just having funsies
>>17559726
thanks for that link, ill have to read it later, but read it i will
>>17559668
Get real, he was caucasoid and ruled over negros and other beasts.
>>17559706
>magic rock batteries
This is now a witchcraft-free zone
Deus Vult n shieeeet
>>17559742
but yet, here you keep posting
you must be the most stupid of the stupid, and a glutton for punishment
>>17559749
oh my god you are fucking retarded
>>17559560
I would hope some study has been done I know the thought of getting such an amount of mercury would be abit farfetched but its just after I seen a scientist dude drop a cannonball in a large vat of mercury I had the thought stuck in my mind
also on topic of mercury have you read about this river of mercury under the pyramid of the feathered serpent >>17559529
and yeah your response to it being dumped in the ocean makes sense I guess we would notice if someone had dropped a shitload of liquid mercury in the ocean back then
I just think it would be crazy to find a massive stone pool of mercury burried under the pyramids
>>17559749
total land mass =/= 'land masses'
that is all the hand-holding you are gonna get from me, little fella
>>17558779
To all of those saying it's a tomb, not even one mummy has ever been found inside so there is ZERO evidence of the great pyramid being a tomb.
inb4 but muh raiders muh tomb thieves
Not even the sandrunes inside depict the pyramid being a tomb.
>>17559792
my apologies for taking the bait, /x/, you have better RPing on this board than this guy who can't even continue a line of bait properly
>>17559823
>>17559778
oh and great samefiending too, forgot to take off your name
>>17558779
>No one understands how ancient humans piled rocks onto of each other.
try again
>>17558793
The pyramids were monuments for the Pharohs. Like Cathederals they held some religious significance but were primarily a show of wealth and power.
>>17559826
Can't handle the truth?
>>17559778
Ancient humans everywhere made mounds of rocks, they must be connected!
>>17560026
it is mysterious though that they spent so much time and energy building huge piles of rocks very precisely. Like I say, the pyramid complexes are ridiculous engineering projects. the closet semi-modern comparison I suppose are cathedrals. but those seem pretty chinzy in comparison.
>>17560252
the LHC and ITER and ISS are probably the modern equivalents.
>put a rock on a rock
>fuck it, let's put another rock on it
>>17559501
Even if you put it that way... yeah
You think they had an inter-dimensional portal their deities used to... I don't know, fill this in for me
Joseph Davidovits is a famous chemist who thinks the pyramids were poured like concrete. Makes more sense and explains Sacsayhuamon as well.
what's people's thoughts on the younger dryas impact hypothesis, another possible collision around 2030, and the talks of Shillary's plan for an alien disclosure? At least with regards to the hypothesis, there's some solid publications in big name journals like nature and PNAS corroborating the hypothesis.
>>17558805
>>17558919
>>17558992
>>17559016
>>17559066
>>17559085
>>17559217
>>17559239
>>17559241
>>17559267
>>17559342
>>17559353
>>17559379
>>17559465
So... there was an effort, but it stopped being an effort... (?)
Is this all one bait thread? Akhenaten, are you unironically posting in here? I mean... to be dead serious, no pun intended, if you really wanted to convince someone that your premises or claims were valid... you don't go around calling them
>stoopid
That's just also kind of, well... stupid. I mean... the problem with >>17559465 is that someone like me is willing to put forth my own supposed intellect and come to my own conclusions, based on my own merit and wits and findings. The problem with that, is that someone once taught me my ABCs and the 123s... which means I didn't learn that all by myself. Which is bad, if I'm supposed to draw my own conclusions on my own, 100%, no help, no... influence from people who, supposedly, went and did the learning for me so that I could make better judgement if they failed somewhere in their findings.
It doesn't have to be the de-facto, absolute truth, but... it can't be wholly ignored, can it? If it can, then anyone who disagrees with what you find or conclude, anyone who shares their conclusions with you... no one is right, and no one matters, except one and one's narrative. You just can't improve upon, or re-interpret the information/concepts/ideas/conclusions that someone who you believe to be credible, or who you find might be right, has left for you if this is the case.
I just want to play devil's advocate here, if I can:
It doesn't seem impossible to believe that some group of people back then had an affinity for architecture, structural design, geometry, numerology, logic, or efficiency... does it? We do things all the time, like print silicon-based circuits. We most definitely know how to make a cord drill from 4 stones and a stick. We've been doing that for a while, haven't we?
>>17558779
It was all about skying! They built these things because they had no mountains. Unfortunately, before they had finished them, the ice age was over.
Jinn helped build the pyramids
Only on /x/ can a colossal faggot think his alleged knowledge about ancient fucking Egypt puts him in a position to mock anyone else, for anything, ever. Egypt for fucks sake, your actually even more autistic than those weabo spergs
The ancient egyptians were migrants from a beautiful mountain region. They missed the mountains and was a cultural need that got inherited for generations. Finally they built huge mountains.
desert draculas, obviously
>>17558827
It's not though, anything that can even be construed as /pol/ content gets shut down on /his/.
>>17558992
The pyramid being built in that time doesn't mean all the materials had to be excavated and prepared in that time.
>>17559224
>citated
Cited
>>17558817
>Fallen Angel worship
>code for UFO crash
>iwanttobelieve.jpg
It's happening.
>>17560587
1.21 Niggawats
>>17558992
Most stones were quarried on site.
Not hard to find sandstone in the desert
>>17558779
Probably just used to store grain to be honest
>>17559291
You this is a fucking myth, don't you?
It's easy to smack the loser across the face.
Ffs people
>>17558779
For spaceships
>>17559068
>Did ancient Egyptians all have autism?
Do you know what autism is?
>>17558779
>no one knows how
There were giants before the flood.
The pyramids and statues all around the area are eroded by water.
If you watch those ancient aliens type programs, they speculate on Atlantis and pole shifts saying that the area is eroded by rain because the location they are built in used to be a tropical paradise.
However, those people only cherry pick verses in the bible to support their alien theories, they don't actually know that the bible is the Word of God.
A 1m x 1m stone to a man is impossible to lift.
A 1m x 1m stone to a 60ft giant is like a man lifting bricks.
Multiply the size of your body by 10 to get the idea of how it was done.
I can stretch my little finger and thumb out, and the distance between is roughly 10 inches.
At 60ft tall, that would be 100 inches.
100 inches = 2.54 meters finger spread width.
Genesis 6:4
There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
Deuteronomy 3:11
For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants; behold his bedstead was a bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon? nine cubits was the length thereof, and four cubits the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man.
Numbers 13:33
And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.
"Short-horned grasshoppers range in size from 5 mm to 11 cm (0.2 to 4.3 inches) in length"
A man of 4'3" is 10 times the size of a grasshopper.
>>17561437
Got my maths wrong at the end, but it doesn't matter. They were giants.
>>17561437
Giants still exist though
>>17561453
>Giants still exist
You need to form an argument or post evidence to support this claim or I have no reason to believe it.
>>17561437
Actually giants exist. Try to search it on google about there remains.
OP, when you ask why a massive number of people would waste ridiculous amounts of resources or manpower on something seemingly useless, the answer is always religion.
>>17558779
That's not a picture of the necropolis. It's Snefiru's bent pyramid (likely the third attempt at a true pyramid, the first being at Saqqara --Djoser's step pyramid; and the second was Snefiru's attempt at another step pyramid at Meydum). But one thing is for certain. Only the early pyramids in the Old Kingdom were really used for tombs. Most sarcophagi in the middle and kingdoms were found in specific burial sites (see Valley of the Kings). But what religious purpose did the continued pyramid building serve? Who knows for sure what the ritual purpose and centrality of stone monoliths, especially pyramids (mesoamerican included) was for? But hopefully one day the builders will come back...and then we're likely fucked because if one thing humanity is good at is doing something inbred autist stupid to fuck itself over.
>>17559454
They wouldn't "glow". They would gleam/shine under the Sun because they were covered in polished white stone and tipped with gold
>>17561620
>Only the early pyramids in the Old Kingdom were really used for tombs.
Those are actually the earliest pyramids and were the egyptians attempt at copying the much, much older giza plateau pyramids which they of course could not replicate
You ever think that they just started fucking laying bricks down. Then all the sudden pyriamid?
Building pyriamids are pretty fucking easy.
Tunnels and shit? Sure, fucking dont lay bricks where you want the walkway to be, or layout the halway first, then build around it.
Why are idiots so astonished by pyramids. Theres not much else to do than lay bricks if you're a sand nigger.
>>17559460
ibisPhones. thanks brother. Although it is fun to toy with the idea that the pyramids were used as a power source (re: the pyramid code). Power for what...we've no fucking idea. Why did the baghdad batteries exist? it could have been used for things like electroplating (coating a metal with another metal for mere aesthetic purposes...although why the hell you would need a pyramid size battery for electroplating makes no sense). What if they had ancient light (simple filament that could be illuminated in an alabaster bowl, vase)? but there would have been transmission cables (nope. electricity could have been propagated through the air as repeatedly demonstrated by Tesla)...Or what if these were earth based power stations for otherworldly beings? Whatever the answer it is great entertainment to place already incredible structures into far-flung context of ancient power plants, aliens, when the more appropriate path is to give man the credit we deserve. We are builders, we are engineers, we take the land and bend it to our will. And fuck me, doesn't this pyramid I had thousands upon thousands of workers build not nicely demonstrate my monstrosity of a god-dong?
>>17561542
>Panama canal
>>17561637
no. The three pyramids I just named were the firsts. The great pyramids at Giza were Khufu's perfection which were built after the step pyramids.
>>17561644
The Panama Canal is very useful though
>>17561647
nuuupe
they are much much older. tens of thousands of years older.
>>17561643
But what if they were just landmarks... and if they were highly reflective, maybe they could reflect moonlight, or help people with their sense of direction from a long distance away
Saying they're power sources sounds so retarded, I can't even refute it
>>17560389
Still waiting for response
>>17559239
First known compass was made in 206 BC lol
>>17561827
>Saying they're power sources sounds so retarded, I can't even refute it
they were some kind of resonance energy machine. nobody knows the hows or the whys but that resonance was involved is obvious
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKLh6-9PjO4&nohtml5=False
>>17559513
Wait, what is meant by that?
Spell it out. What is the center of a surface of a sphere?
Not trying to be shitter, just not understanding.
>>17559575
Leap year
>>17561962
>using an insane conspiracy theorist's video as evidence.
Top keks
>>17558818
>>17558822
>>17558827
>>17560936
^ this last guy is right. /his/ is a fine place to discuss ancient architecture and structures. It's not /pol/ at all aside the few who show up from there to post (like on every board).
You will find Occam's Razor as an accepted explanation for things such as why we find ancient pyramid structures all over the globe, and they will LOL at the idea that it was ancient ayyy lmao's.
Just remember if you're new to a board, LURK MOAR, and you'll be fine.
>>17559220
technically, the United States IS "America", Actually. I realize there is North America, and South America (and the many nations there are American, or South American), and that as a whole, both N&S together can be called "The Americas".
But yeah, you can use context to tell as well, usually, when someone is just interchanging "the U.S." or "USA" with "America". Of course, the guy you replied to >>17558936 said
>slavery
which is most certainly not exclusive to the history of the U.S. - slavery is ancient, as has been found all over the world. It still exists today...
>>17558992
>how little these 'scholars' actually know about ancient egypt
hold up.. what we DO know now about the pyramids came from -scholars- right?
isn't just a case of "this is what we though before" (or guessed), until "we found something and have re-evaluated what we thought earlier" which is to say, how science works?
Fun Fact: the entry to King Tut's tomb was discovered in 1922, less than 100 years ago.
and over the next decade, the world's imagination was on fire for all things Egyptian.
>pic related
also see:
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-28403598
Tutankhamun: How 'Tut-mania' gripped the world
and
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-features/10973256/Why-the-world-went-wild-for-King-Tut.html
>>17559119
thanks, great info. I'm going to read up on this.
>>17558779
Do you guys believe that Ancient Egyptians were black people? Negroids?
Cause I got into an argument with a black guy about it and black people dont have shit so if he wants to believe that its fine with me, but isnt it rather pathetic that black people who have been infamously subjugated and exploited in recent history, are now trying to claim ancestry from an empire that was built entirely with a huge caste of slaves?
>>17559239
>did your mother have any children that lived, el capitano of the abortion bucket escapees?
>necropolis
>nobody knows its purpose
Um, anon...
>>17562191
lol
>>17559454
>It also encased pink granite and other excellent electrical insulators
I once stumbled on a documentary with Egyptology scholars (professors from renown universities), one who was on-site at different pyramids, AND there was an old Egyptian man who had this special role in this culture of having been part of a line of men who did the same - passing stories about ancient Egypt and the pyramids down through generations. It was SO fascinating. The history and science was 100% legit. Speculation, sure, but by the best brains for the job using the best information available currently (and throughout 'spoken' Egyptian history). In fact, I remember a part about what you said here, that they could have theoretically made electricity. IIRC, it had to do with water flowing underneath and it causing turnstiles or something to turn and generate power. (that was a big part of this TV special or documentary, or whatever it was, how the geography land where the pyramids sit today has changed so drastically over the ages!)
The Nile was so much higher and would flood and their valleys were fertile with life, not sand as far as the eye could see.
I specifically recall from this show, too, how it's possible that they were able to create certain audible tones - that there were these few structures - may not have been pyramids... I can't exactly remember... I think they said one could have been used as a bath house... but they believed a few of them were made so that these tones would be audible, somehow using the water again, to cause vibrations. They theorized that this may have been a healing place. It's believed the ancient Egyptians possibly had medical interventions like trepanning (google if you don't know, it's really fascinating), based on tools and artifacts found. Even today we are studying vibrations and energy and how they affect the mind and body (binaural beats and such, for an example).
Man I wish I could find that show again
>>17562224
the show's called ancient aliens boi
>>17562242
>the show's called ancient aliens
No
>>17562242
>boi
and no.
Can you actually read? How did you manage to type your comment? I don't understand.
>it's a Akhenatan vs Anonymous thread
Well, this became slightly interesting.
>>17559465
>you have done nothing other than spout someone else's work
Chortled.
That is ironic of you to say, considering you're doing the same, parroting information you read about Eygpt and the Pyramids and spinning it into your words.
>>17558779
>>17558793
>>17558805
>>17559924
>4000 years ago
What's next are you going to suggest aliens built them?
The way the temple grounds were surveyed suggests they had a lot more meaning and engineering put into them than just to bury or honor pharaohs, not to mention the multiple other huge pyramid temples around the world with similar design, and even different kinds like the angkor wat and angkor thom.
I'd suggest watching some Graham Hancock about Egyptology, but don't delve too much into his later stuff he went a tad loopy recently.
>>17558992
>further bullshit can be found when examining the great pyramid itself, who scholars claim was built in only 20 years.
It was built by 4,000 workers over the course of 20 years, it was also build on the quarry and the workers and families lived on site in housing. Foremen even had their own villas. These 4,000 workers would be in teams called Phyles that led to a healthy competitive atmosphere.
There's literally nothing mysterious about the Pyramids, the Cattedrale di Santa Maria del Fiore's dome has less known about it's construction method. 20 years is nothing, the Cattedrale di Santa Maria del Fiore was deemed complete 200 years after its initial construction.
>moving large masses with simple means
>hard
>>17562507
It's hard. Simple, but hard
>>17559417
Ancient Aliens has literally nothing to do with this. A stupid 21st century TV show means jack shit in a conversation about 4,000+ year old monoliths with extremely precise cuts and fits in the incorporated stones. The Pyramids have several interesting qualities that are well-known by everyone who isn't an idiot, including:
>Astronomical: Alignment with the three stars in the belt of the constellation Osiris, suggesting an advanced knowledge of astronomy.
Osiris is an Egyptian deity whose life story is nearly identical in structure to the Biblical Christ mythos.
>Geometric: The pyramids are nearly perfectly geometric, suggesting an advanced knowledge of engineering and mathematics.
The footprint of the Pyramids are nearly perfectly square. The faces of the pyramids are also almost perfectly flat. Interestingly, each face is bent horizontally about halfway up the height of the pyramid, produces two facets each. The angular difference between these two facets is less than 1 degree; this kind of engineering precision in the form of pyramidal stone structures was, as far as we know, impossible until the early 20th century when technological advancements made it "possible".
>Geographic: The positioning of the pyramids are highly non-random, suggesting an advanced knowledge of geography, sea-faring & navigation, and astronomical orientation.
Each face of the pyramids points in a cardinal direction with a precision we could not match until, similarly, the early 20th century after the technologies emerging from the Industrial Revolution made it possible. The Giza site itself sits in the middle of the worlds landmass *as it was when they were built*. It is important to understand that the 5,000 - 6,000 years between the Younger Dryas and the believed creation date of the Pyramids was characterized by warming temperatures --> receding glacial ice and latitudes of ice formation --> increasing liquid precipitation --> rising water level.
>>17559419
Not really possible. Mercury in the needed quantities is impractical to obtain, much less work with. Liquid mercury is toxic to humans, so would have caused significant poisoning and other health effects in the exposed labor force. Water would work to transport large stones (depending on the engineering of the track) despite water being much lighter than mercury.
>>17559444
A very reasonable post. It makes sense too. Early archaeology was really shaky as a "science", and it produced a lot of wonky theories. The sub-fields of sociology have tried to correct for this, although some (myself included) would argue that their corrective efforts have, in some places, become rather extreme and unreasonable. The point being, that a lot of these fields aren't as hard of a science as biology or physics, and are vulnerable to errors caused by misinterpretation, projection, and ego. Unfortunately, it is largely the ego of the individual Egyptologists about their work that is keeping the current sub-discipline from reforming in the wake of new data and emergent theories that incorporate this new data.
>>17559452
This is a good post. You make a good point when you say, "
if i have the ability to make a building that can withstand an earthquake, why in the world would i change techniques later on to a construction that falls like a house of cards?" This is strongly supportive of the theory that the pyramids were built by a pre-egyptian society that collapsed, or that the Egyptians at the very least used information or influence from that society when building the pyramids. As it stands now, you're right, there is little water being held in the argument that the high culture of Ancient Egypt emerged almost overnight from primitive hunter-gatherer ancestors.
>>17559447
>>17559460
>>17559506
>>17559473
Your brain cells are about as sophisticated as soap scum.
>>17562492
The pyramids were not built with 4,000 people in 20 years. Whoever told you that is at best wrong and at worst lying to you. Those numbers are far too small; the pyramids literally took generations to complete. People who started working on them in their 20s would die of old age before the pyramids were finished.
>>17559840
you ever get tired of constantly being wrong?
>>17560026
oh great king of oversimplification, just go kill yourself, preferably with a giant 'mound of rock'
>>17560530
i hope you werent expecting an actual refutation of that nearly unintelligible screed you just posted.
less drugs, more education
>>17560577
if by colossal faggot, you mean a person who can construct correct context and spelling, then yes
>>17561107
most?
the best you can do is offer an indefinite article?
im sure saqqara egypt will be highly pissed to know that morons like you think that the rocks were quarried locally.
>>17561182
gtfo ben carson
>>17563004
>>17563018
>>17563029
>>17563038
>>17563043
>condescending this hard
It's like you think we're serious or something.
>>17561638
>all the sudden
kill yourself, shitstain
>>17562224
same anon from this post about the pyramid documentary...
I said Egyptology scholars, but I left out that these people were anthropologists, historians. I'm sure there was an archeologist in there. Professors with multiple disciplines of study...
Can anyone here help me remember the name of this special? Documentary? Episode of TV it was that I saw?
>>17561946
so?
do you know the difficulty involved in aligning a structure to within a tenth of a degree to true north?
as i previously stated, we were not able to do the same thing until the nineteenth century, even with your newfangled compass.
you are just fucking dipped in dumb, eh?
>>17561827
well thats good, because saying they were tombs prompts the same response from me.
there is no evidence of the great pyramid ever being host to any mummies, but yet simple minded mouthbreathers like you believe it.
>>17563056
>>17562224
also, I think the part about some smaller pyramid structures, or these healing places or bath houses that could sound a tone when vibrations passed through, even something about overtones IIRC.
It was as if these small pyramids were giant musical instruments you could be inside - maybe the effect of hearing the echo and vibrations healed you, or helped you tune in with spirits...
I wish I could remember the science behind how the structures would produce sound, maybe it was use of the water again somehow, or just the shape of the walls inside.
Please let me know if any of this rings a bell.
>>17561972
*sighing intesifies*
forget the sphere, as the earth's shape has nothing to do with what we are talking about.
and no, im not going to spell it out for you, you can do your own legwork, although i will apologize if english is not your first language.
but we both know it is, so no apology necessary
>>17562085
>technically, the United States IS "America"
aaaand another idiot opens his stupid mouth.
no it isnt. America is north, central, and south america.... period.
the united states is the united states OF america.
i used to think that right-wingers were just talking out of their ass about the terrible state of public education, but ill be fucked, after this thread, they just might be right.
>>17562136
>isn't just a case of "this is what we though before" (or guessed), until "we found something and have re-evaluated what we thought earlier" which is to say, how science works?
oh sweet jesus, we have another person who doesnt have his or her head fully up his or her ass.
yes, that is how it should be. but, archeologists and egyptologists are basically cockblocking any changes to past theories
>>17563018
Well, I had hopes, but you dashed them with your screed. I feel like you were in another thread though, because there's a lot of
>OMG UR ON DRUGZ I DON'T LIEK U KYS DUMDUM
going on around here
Despite the fact that there was an education present in both of our cases.
It's really bad logic.
>>17562316
well, i give credit where it is due... you are partly right.
the exception is, i have actually been to most of the megalithic sites (except for cusco) in central and south america.
so, it is a hodgepodge of research and IRL experience.
even with that being so, it is still more experience and knowledge than some sunlight-starved neckbeard spouting the first nonsense that google spits back at him.
>>17562492
other than me telling you that you are an idiot of the first order, your post is not worth responding to.
>>17563052
if you aren't serious, then take your monkey ass to /b/ and let the grown folks talk.
the fact that you refer to 'we' as if you speak for everyone, lets me know everything about you that i need to know.
>>17563117
>hey guise, he said screed so im gonna say screed too!
i stopped reading there, oh mighty overlord of no originality
>>17563178
Well, I learned that screed is an accurate word to use when the dialogue is an angry piece of writing that usually accuses someone of something, or complains about something.
Like the lack of originality in using interpersonal symbology to convey meaning. You know, words.
>>17563167
Point is you gain literally nothing by being condescending. You're either capable of acknowledging that or not. Given that you're a namefag, we already know everything about you that was worth knowing. Thanks for making it easy to filter your shit.
>>17562492
they actually worked in shifts. the way the Egyptian economy was set up was that portions of the population would serve the state for a series of months living in the established state housing you mentioned.
>>17563193
that all sounds like a HUGE excuse for being a follower instead of a leader.
but, you can suck my dick and all will be forgiven
>>17563100
fuck you, dude. it's important to say the United States (and "America" isn't the same as saying the US), but in real fucking life, in the United States, when you say America, people know what the fuck you mean. It doesn't mean we're a bunch of yokel dumb-asses with shit education. what good is all the technical PC being correct by-the-book knowledge going to do you if it just leaves you an asshole with no ability to be social like a normal person?
>>17563194
and again, you fail to come up with anything even bordering on an original thought.
good job, madame mediocrity
>>17563219
you have contributed nothing to this thread and have proven that you are actually retarded.
>>17563207
yeah, and all the records regarding the building of the pyramids is where you got this info, right?
oh wait, those records don't exist, so either you are a time traveler, a clairvoyant, or are simply talking out your asshole.
my money is on the latter.
>>17563230
it's actually information derived from archaeological excavations related to the living sites of the workers. you would know this if you weren't a dumb dumb
>>17563218
you're a weak and simple motherfucker if you would trade accuracy and truth for social standing.
go back to facebook or whatever millenial, i dont want to be called a faggot but i like to suck dicks, bullshit fucking site you normally frequent
>>17563212
Who... uh, what? I'm supposed to be a leader? What? What does that have to do with anything... ? I thought... I was a stupid, drug-addled, feeble-minded, excuse-peddling, unoriginal slab of flesh.
I don't get it, honest. Are you saying that I'm a leader, and I'm pretending to be a follower, or that I'm a follower, who pretends to be a leader? In either case... what does any of that have to do with forgiveness and fellatio? Unless you're being cheeky.
>>17563225
if i gave two shits what braindead simpletons thought about what i have to say, then id have exactly two shits.
whenever you get done sitting on one thumb and diddling your micropenis with the other, ill be here waiting to laugh at whatever nonsensical bullshit you have to offer next.
>>17563245
oh look the mental handicap made another completely useless post
>>17563233
so, you are saying there has been recovered documentation from the workers sites?
ill wait for the pdf of the peer-reviewed journal that states this.... but i suspect i will be waiting a VERY long time.
>>17563116
>archeologists and egyptologists are basically cockblocking any changes to past theories
who is coming up with the new theories then? anthropologists?
from what I've seen, it's the stubbornness of people and general, or the lack of knowing better or being more aware of current findings. I mean, I was taught in school (a loooooong time ago, I mean like, I was born not long after the pyramids were built - ha ha, JK, but really I'm 37) that they were tombs for Pharaohs. It's like a myth that just permeated the thinking of society for too long after it was found it wasn't accurate. I KNOW that's not the only case of it happening, either. (One, probably not the best) example that comes to mind is how people still think Addiction is more than a choice than it is a disease, or that it is all choice and not a disease/disorder/brain injury. (Addicts brains are actually chemically imbalanced that impacts normal choosing ability - their brains are wired to say "we need x drug, not food, sex, safety, shelter, etc."; that is not a "choice") AND the myth that NA or AA and the 12 steps is still the best program of treatment. Specifically in addiction of opiates, this isn't the case, and we KNOW this now based on the latest medical research and neurological studies... but you won't see that evident in your local rehab center.)
sorry, I'm much more familiar with medicine than I am with ancient history (especially Egyptian!) haha
but anyway, would you mind elaborating? how do we get people to know (or care?) about learning updated science findings about the pyramids? why is it you think the archeologists and egyptologists are doing this knowledge cockblocking? (lol'ing at that term, btw. damn cockblockers!)
>>17563244
i dont have to say anything, you keep proving it for me.
you cant even foment an original comeback, but we have had this conversation before, i suspect.
that is what makes you an unoriginal follower. do you need the paint-by-numbers to comprehend this?
>>17563249
why would i tell you anything you cunt?
But yes, I do have many sources. I suggest you try using google.
>>17563249
fuck it, here's ONE source. too bad you won't be able to read this.
One Landscape, Many Tenants: Uncovering Multiple Claims, Visions and Meanings on the Theban Necropolis
by Tully, Gemma; Hanna, Monica
Archaeologies, 12/2013, Volume 9, Issue 3
>>17563266
here's another one just for fun
A Geomorphological Study of the Giza Necropolis, with Implications for the Development of the Site
by Reader C.D
Archaeometry, 01/2001, Volume 43, Issue 1
>>17563269
One more, just for kicks
The Orientations of the Giza Pyramids and Associated Structures
by Nell, Erin; Ruggles, Clive
Journal for the History of Astronomy, 08/2014, Volume 45, Issue 3
>>17563255
I kind of don't have to say anything either. I'm just taking the piss out of you, because you're fun to talk to. You're not fun to listen to, but you're fun to read. There's no need to be original, either. You're living in your own world, so it's impossible for anyone else to really permeate your self-proclaimed psychosis, else they incur the wrath of the great Akhenaten, incorrigible being of pure originality.
There's nothing to garner from you, with respect to me. I wouldn't be getting anything if you acknowledged me (which you are taking the time to do), or if you disregarded me (which you are claiming to do).
>>17563249
Micropenises, accusing people of masturbation, projecting on them, perceived hostility, being wholly hostile, taking everything to heart...
There really isn't much here that you'd be contributing to, except sliding the thread out of existence via your trip.
>>17563272
one of my favs
Akhet Khufu: Archaeo-astronomical Hints at a Common Project of the Two Main Pyramids of Giza, Egypt
by Magli, Giulio
Nexus Network Journal, 04/2009, Volume 11, Issue 1
>>17563251
>why is it you think the archeologists and egyptologists are doing this knowledge cockblocking?
well the first and foremost reason is that nobody who is recognized as an expert in their field wants to have their their lifes work proven as false.
>but really I'm 37
thats okay, im 39
a good example is the fact that the great pyramid itself is a scale representation of the northern hemisphere expressed in geometry.
there are other things like the repeated use of pi, when pi wasnt even a thing till thousands of years later. there is also the golden ratio expressed in it's construction, and even a whole series of other formulaic conclusions based upon measuring the pyramid with meters instead of cubits.
all this is dismissed as chance or coincidence by archaeologists/egyptologists
>>17563277
another i really got a kick out of
Influences of wind flow over heritage sites: A case study of the wind environment over the Giza Plateau in Egypt
by Hussein, Ashraf S; El-Shishiny, Hisham
Environmental Modelling and Software, 2009, Volume 24, Issue 3
>>17563259
>bait harder faggotron
>>17563285
Another really great read- a personal favorite!
Location of the Old Kingdom Pyramids in Egypt
by Bárta, Miroslav
Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 10/2005, Volume 15, Issue 2
>>17563291
a crucial read
The Title Inspektor of the Palace during the Egyptian Old Kingdom
by Bárta, Miroslav
Archív Orientální, 01/1999, Volume 67, Issue 1
>>17563218
geez, I'm sorry I offended you so badly. I only meant to point out you were being mean on the internet. You were pretty hostile in your reply to me (for a minor, minor thing), and that pissed me off.
I should have said what I meant by The US of A also being known as "America" is technically correct by it's use here... as in:
>God Bless America,
Land that I love.
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a light from above.
From the mountains, to the prairies,
To the oceans, white with foam
God bless America, My home sweet home
I remember singing this one in my junior high school chorus at an assembly:
>O beautiful for patriot dream
That sees beyond the years
Thine alabaster cities gleam
Undimmed by human tears!
America! America!
God shed his grace on thee
And crown thy good with brotherhood
From sea to shining sea!
O beautiful for halcyon skies,
For amber waves of grain,
For purple mountain majesties
Above the enameled plain!
America! America!
God shed his grace on thee
Till souls wax fair as earth and air
And music-hearted sea!
Ray Charles also does an amazing version.
>>17563266
fuck it?
i suspect the only thing you have ever fucked is your hand, little guy.
and im done responding to you, i dont troll easy, and you are obviously a tryhard.
>>17563292
another great study!
The Palace Façade Motif and the Pyramid Texts as Cosmic Boundaries in Unis's Pyramid Chambers
by De Trafford, Aloisia
Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 10/2007, Volume 17, Issue 3
>>17563299
This one is really great!
LEPSIUS TOMBS IN THE GIZA NECROPOLIS REDISCOVERED: PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE RUSSIAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MISSION AT GIZA EXCAVATIONS 2006—2008
by KORMYSHEVA, ELEONORA; MALYKH, SVETLANA
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 01/2010, Volume 96
>>17563298
But you sure troll hard, Akhenaten.
You sure troll hard.
>5 minutes of coitus > pursuit of knowledge
>>17563276
you can think whatever you want to about me slick, i was born and raised before the internet, so my sense of value is not determined by some random idiot who means absolutely nothing to me.
sorry, no prize for you pipsqueak!
>>17563303
another CRUCIAL peer-reviewed article- love this one, read it a few times!
Slab Stelae of the GizaNecropolis. By Peter Der Manuelian. Publications of the Pennsylvania‐Yale Expedition to Egypt, no. 7. New Haven and Philadelphia: The Peabody Museum of Natural History of Yale University and The University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and...
by Papazian, Hratch
Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 01/2009, Volume 68, Issue 1
>>17563309
ooohhh nearly forgot this gem; check this one out, make sure you study it CLOSELY
ON THE EARLY HISTORY OF GIZA: THE 'LOST' WADI CEMETERY (GIZA ARCHIVES GLEANINGS, III)
by MANUELIAN, PETER DER
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 01/2009, Volume 95
>>17563293
>replying to himself
get the fuck out of here, newfag
It is really obvious that aliens built it you morons
>>17563321
its rabble-rousers like you who devolve an honest conversation into a laughing stock.
get the fuck out
>>17563283
see I wasn't under that impression, that it was ALL being dismissed by those in the field. maybe because of this thing I watched... I posted this >>17562224
and for Pete's sake, I'm this anon >>17563218
>>17563293 anon, too.
You're 39, I'm 37. We hated each other upon first sight, meeting anonymously on a Mongolion Potato Paintings image board. We should fall in love and get married. Our story will be made into a movie in 2047, when we will be come the latest famous example of the slap-slap-kiss trope
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SlapSlapKiss
>>17563315
honest mistake. I'm so not a newfag. I'm 37, remember?
WHY are you SO angry?? I hope your temper doesn't fly off the handle as quickly in your real life. You seem quite an intelligent person. Don't let your rage make you say stupid things.
And I'll be more careful in crafting my replies (and who I'm replying to) in the future, so that I don't sound stupid either.
>>17563293
ORIGINALLY meant to reply to >>17563237
Mr. Akhenaten
obviously. there's your (you) !
thank you for correcting me, yet again.
Love you, sweetie!
xoxo,
A
>>17563331
the show you were wondering about in >>17562224 is a series called 'the pyramid code'
as for the rest, sometimes one anon seems like another anon.
when im blocking and parrying the naysayers and shills, sometimes i get tunnel vision and there is collateral damage
>>17563308
>pipsqueak
Ah, here it is. I'm a "youngin'" so I should scram. But I'm your future, so I hope you know what you're doing with that bitter attitude. Me being a decade younger than you doesn't make anything I say irrelevant, surely.
The prize is watching you reply. Thinking whatever we want about people isn't mutually exclusive.
>>17563326
You should take that advice, if you're willing to let an entire wealth of human knowledge stagnate within one generation (which in of itself is even more fragmented with unique individuals, and probably doesn't even have the right to call itself a generation). Also...
>>17563337
>WHY are you SO angry??
Protip: being 37 doesn't prevent you from being new at all. Ask, and you will find some 30-something year olds who have never heard of "the hacker known as 4chan".
>>17563350
im sorry my psychic abilities are non-existent and i cannot immediately tell who it is im replying to.
perhaps if you are seeking special treatment, you should identify yourself in some way when posting, upping the probability of said preferential treatment
>>17563347
Can you produce anything other than YouTube videos to support your oh do original argument?
>>17563362
Well... I'm not seeking special treatment.
You're giving me special treatment. I just came here to play devil's advocate, and it went so very wrong. I didn't get anything out of it.
>>17563350
and you are confusing 'anger' with a matter-of-fact, no-punches-pulled style of communication.
some people get it, some people dont, generally speaking, those who take issue with it are the type who are easily butthurt
im a grown man, and ill do and say as i please, which is not pc as you mentioned earlier.
in fact, being politically correct is not the same as trying to be factually correct
>>17563347
well, Akhe-baby, are you going to reply to >>17563293 beyond calling me a newfag for accidently replying to my earlier post instead of your hostile one that followed it?
I want to hold on to the fantasy of you and I meeting IRL and falling madly in love, but I'm concerned about this
>blocking and parrying the naysayers and shills, sometimes i get tunnel vision
I'm honestly concerned about that anger so obvious in your posts ITT. I asked here >>17563350 but you just gave me a protip that 37 doesn't prevent me from being a newfag.
Are you just really passionate about Ancient Egypt? Are you high on speed?
>>17563373
>im a grown man
I'm a grown woman. Talk to me.
>>17563373
Still waiting for your evidence any evidence. I've just provided you with ten peer reviewed scholary articles in hugely respected academic journals that provide multiple overlapping proof of my case.
>>17563365
well, considering i haven't actually linked to any youtube videos, im not sure where you are coming from with that comment.
me being aware of these videos is not the same as me endorsing those videos, and if you had actually read the thread, you would have seen me make mention of my IRL experience on the subject of megalithic sites.
but that of course would have required you to put some effort in before posting.
>>17563394
I created this thread
>>17563383
tits with timestamp or gtfo
>>17563400
Stay classy dumbass
>>17563373
That's the problem. There's no tone here. There's register in what one might type, some might argue... but there aren't any sounds. I can't find what you might intend to enunciate from the symbols you're giving me.
What you want to do is what is done through talking aloud. What you're doing is more or less the opposite.
I swear on it, I'm anything but butthurt right now. I don't want anyone to turn their ears off when they hear something they don't like- which is what you started doing to a lot of anons the moment they were the least bit contradictory. That's how people avoid growing and developing as a person.
I'm a growing young man. I'll also say and do as I please, which involves discussion, deliberation, analysis, and not being afraid of criticism or being incorrect. You'll seldom find shit-flinging on my part. And I don't like hugboxes, I think they stratify people greatly. I really did want a constructive conversation that would probably have let you (and others) build up some organized points against the mainstream narrative. That didn't happen, apparently. Just a lot of shit-flinging and confusing the nameless.
>>17563383
Uh, that was me, that anon who suggested that anyone can be a newfag. It's fairly true. Let's clear the air here. Not trying to be edgy or mean or aggressive... but it's a really bad way to prove that you're not new. Possible, but very weak.
>>17563386
you've obviously not read the thread then, as i have repeatedly said that the 'scholars' in this subject ARE the problem.
>>17563383
>>17563386
Please don't bite so hard. Namefags are never worth your time.
>>17563395
wow, excuse me for not knowing that
let me just roll the red carpet out for you! you want a glass of champagne, a cigar, a three thousand dollar hooker?
>>17563408
Yah they are definitely not the problem since I take the time to quote you hard evidence in multiple scholary sources but you literally nothing to say in response. You are just another talentless blowhard
>>17563403
you know the rules
>>17563413
I really want to see our boy here produce ANY evidence to support his case
>>17563406
tl;dr
if you want a response from me, don't write a fucking novel
>>17563413
>so says the namefag>>17563422
>>17563422
are you fucking retarded?
ive spent this entire thread (when not talking shit) going on about how the scholarly view is incorrect. ive mentioned several things that can easily be verified, and i am not going to repeat myself.
either read the thread and do with what ive offered as you will, or dont, i could care less.
>>17563426
Well, that's a problem, because it sounds like the reason you won't read that one anon's cited works, is because you don't want to read.
That's not a good thing to be proud of, at least, I don't think. Not if you're about checking the facts, and being able to discern who's peddling what, and why it might be wholly incorrect or incomplete. Or, trying to find explanations to unexplained issues or glaring inconsistencies. What would happen if you met like-minded people, and you wrote a 30-page analysis on the Giza Necropolis using all of your findings?
Also... you're still responding. You don't really care that I wrote a novel, and I think you finally see that I'm actually trying to have a discussion with you. I'm sorry... but what I want to discuss with you is probably, in it's totality, larger than any novel that has ever been physically printed.
>>17563440
You have stated your opinion. But you have provided nothing to support it
>>17563443
>>17563346
>>17563299
samefag, try again
nobody said i wasn't willing to read anything, you just assumed that.
lemme just go ahead and pull out my harry potter wand and conjure these texts out of nowhere and get to reading them all now.
or maybe what you RPing asshats are used to is maybe i should try to bullshit my way through convincing everyone i have read them and stealing snippets from google books.
im legit, other than the name, and sincere. i don't need to lie or RP to kick it, and i sure aint here to impress any of you jerkoffs.
>>17563444
you need to reread the thread then, sonny boy, your reading comprehension is shit.
i offered specifics, you are either too stupid or too lazy to realize that.
unless you are suggesting that i suddenly produce a scholarly text to refute another scholarly text... which would be absolutely ludicrous considering the type of argument im positing
>>17558779
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbyzgeee2mg
I think this song can help you
>>17563422
It's bait, anon. He's posting to see who stops taking him seriously. Purely and for that reason alone, and no other.
>>17563462
No... not the samefag at all. You'll find my legitimacy in the left. Also... I'm not RPing. I don't have a trip, never will have one either. I didn't come here to impress. I came here, verbatim, to be contrarian and instigate some serious discussion.
> you just assumed that
Because you never made it crystal clear. All you typed was
>if you want a response from me, don't write a fucking novel
>don't write a fucking novel
>if you want a response from me
>don't write
>lemme just go ahead and pull out my harry potter wand and conjure these texts out of nowhere and get to reading them all now
That's... kind of on you, though. You asked for sources, but, not the materials. If you're as sincere as you say, you'd be willing to go through the trouble of squiring the sources. Unless the issue is trivial to you, and you can't be bothered to put that much effort into checking some allegedly legitimate sources of information pertinent to the thread/pertinent to your hypotheses/posts.
No one's asking for bullshit. If they are, then I'm not asking for bullshit... unless, you're asking to bullshit, which would be reasonable to conclude if the argument you're positing isn't worth scholarly texts or any further effort on your part.
>>17563413
hahaaha, thanks girlfriend. I never in a million years thought I'd ever flirt with a guy on 4chan. I've been here since around 2008, maybe earlier, I honestly can't even remember.
I'd post tits or GTFO if this was /b/ or some other board were the "no girls on the internet" rule is important.
Funny, the importance of that rule is since we are all anonymous, and no one is special - unless we make it aware we're a girl; suddenly, then, the female anon gets special attention.
KIND OF HOW AKHENATEN GETS HIMSELF SPECIAL ATTENTION for being a tripfag and yelling at everyone.
I think he should post the first pic with timestamp.
If he does, I will. (though I'll need some advice on how to do it without anyone figuring out who I am.) I wish I could just upload a pic of myself without worrying. Turns out, I'm pretty beautiful!
I'm LoL'ing at his post >>17563400
>tits with timestamp or gtfo
being his reply to me quoting lyrics of famous songs where "America" clearly means "The United States of "America", as in some cases, they CAN be interchangeable terms, which he didn't find acceptable.
(his first attempt at a comeback to that one was to call me a newfag because I accidentally replied to MY earlier post instead of HIS.)
>>17563491
tl;dr
>>17563492
tl;dr
>>17563084
So intelligent and yet you can't explain such a seemingly simple concept. How droll.
>>17563502
Are we done, then?
>>17563462
>>>17563346 (You)
Um, this post is me, the 37 year old girl you were yelling at about America, and discussing current knowledge of pyramids, and you told me the name of that show I was looking for...
I don't know what hell you're fighting about with who-knows-who now, because I've stopped paying attention to this thread, except for >>17563492
>>17563469
Any value that reading the thread could've had is undone entirely by your shitposting. You could well have shared the secrets of the cosmos, but all your work is undone by the fact that you favored shitposting over content.
Leave.
>>17563084
Not even the center, assclown. That calculation relies on the Mercator projection, which is inaccurate as fuark and not used by the Egyptians.
Some other anon was right. The true center is in Turkey
>>17563492
Don't shoot the messenger, but it seems that what Akkybby has posted is enough to make me at least want to look into the subject of legitimate observations of the pyramids being poo-poo'd by the establishment.
Sure he could be a bit more magnanimous about it, but does that make what he has posted any less valuable?
And even though I'd probably want to shit in his gym socks, he has a point about most of you not being able to gather your own conclusions.
>>17563527
a cute!
>>17563507
it isnt a can't, it is a won't.
i will not subsidize your laziness, or ineptitude
>>17563509
is there a 'we'?
there IS a 'me', and this 'me' is done when i decide to be done.
>>17563519
i do as i please, and it pleases me that my doings do not please you.
>>17563531
thank you! :D
holy shit I started having a panic attack that somehow someone was going to hack me
that my picture would get saved somewhere and...
I know that the chances of that happening are unlikely, but I feel better with having deleted it.
Just isn't my style.
>>17563541
Well... there is a "we". Us, as in, the two of us that have been continuing, more or less, a dialogue by replying to one another enough times that you know to reply to >>17563509 and not >>17563519 (when referring to your post >>17563541).
No one said there wasn't a you, explicitly. Definitely not in the sense that you as a person do not exist, either. But, it does feel to me that the 'you' were done when everything was "tl;dr"... which I took to mean that you were "asking to bullshit".
I can't tell with 'you'.
>>17563526
>but does that make what he has posted any less valuable?
Absolutely. One of the most effective disinfo tactics that shills use is posing as an advocate while being a irreparable cunt. In this case I have no reason to believe he was anything other than an irreparable cunt at any point, and I honestly think he's baiting people to read his shitposting because that's what he truly wants people to see.
>>17563541
If you're going to be a cunt about your presence, we can always erase it.
>>17558779
It's believed they were used to source out energy.
It's been said that if you get close all electronics will cease to work. I'm not to educated on the subject though.
just your run of the mill faggot.
>hurr durr please respond
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUFv4rbBkhg&nohtml5=False
>>17563575
you should change your name to "the fag fag"... i mean, it's literally the same, amirite?
>>17563580
drop the hammer then motherfucker!
ill call that bluff
Most logical theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1y8N0ePuF8
TL:DR they used water cosways and the Nile's natural flood seasons to float limestone blocks up to the pyramid sight, where they then built a mud casing which would be filled with water and the limestone blocks would float to the top, fitted in nice cool water.
>>17563614
>cosways
>pyramid sight
>causeways
>pyramid site
people will take you more seriously if you expend the effort to proofread your post before posting.
>>17563614
i'm big fan of the Dassault khufu reborn simulation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NCK99mQUxw
>>17563614
Huh... you know what, this theory, and the discussion/mention of mercury might be what I'd subscribe to.
>>17563575
So, your superiority decides that because you don't like his delivery, that ad hominem is your best course of action?
I like him much better than you, at least he isn't a hypocritical piece of shit.
>>17563633
Uh... he kind of is. I might have proved that earlier, and he might have said that in his own words without having known.
>>17563580
still waiting for the banhammer to drop, internet badass
>>17563638
Care to point that out specifically?
>>17563620
It is telling that you disregard the content because of a few spelling mistakes.
>>17563649
I am not disregarding anything, and if you had bothered to read the thread, someone else already posted your favored theory and i agreed that it was quite plausible.
you people are all knee-jerk reactionaries.
let me say it again more clearly.
PROOFREAD YOUR SHIT BEFORE POSTING SO THAT PEOPLE MAY TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY
>>17563660
oh well, then, I don't give enough of a shit. Especially from someone who uses line breaks after every sentence like some Neogaf whore.
>>17563682
you
need
some
salve
for
that
butthurt
bro?
and sorry, i have to keep it simple to read for shitbirds like you who cant be bothered with the drudgery of proper parlance
>>17563621
i guess you guys are too busy mudslinging to pickup that this video predicts that there are additional undiscovered chambers in the great pyramid.
>>17563734
im not too busy, anon. but i was already aware of that without the dassault vid. but thank you for participating anyways, im sure there are others who are not aware of that.
ps i posted this all ran together to quell the ass-inferno of the other anon who doesn't lke spacing.
>>17563644
Yeah.
>>17559066
>you really should do some actual reading on the subject instead of a cursory google search and then spouting whatever little snippet you read first
("Check your facts!")
>>17559217
> i realize i have been wasting my time with a fucking buffoon who can't think for himself
("You're not going to actually provide anything useful here")
>did you not read the parts about WHY mainstream scholars have this shit wrong?
("Did you not read, at all?")
>>17559273
(This is off-topic, instead of on-topic and meaningful to the discussion in the thread)
>>17559239
>>17559287
(Ad Hominem, more Ad Hominems combined with some food for thought, but served with a desert of Ad Hominem)
>>17559246
>>17559353
>>17559379
(More Ad Hominems, claims of critical thinking and extrapolation possibly found in >>17559389)
>>17559465
>>17559474
>>17559534
>>17559641
>>17559716
>>17559772
>>17559778
>>17559792
(Ad Hominems, Ad Nauseum...)
Here I am, >>17560530. Trying to get a counter-argument out of him, maybe. Maybe slight the slew of Ad Hominems about and get back on topic.
But here we are with
>>17563018
(Ad Hominems)
>>17563117
(Me again,a tiny bit cheeky but nevertheless trying to address the issue)
>>17563178
(Ad Hominem)
>>17563193
(Me again, let's try to defuse this one more time)
>>17563212
(I still don't understand this one, but it's definitely not going to actually provide anything useful here)
>>17563255
(Burdern of Proof (?), lots of changing the subject, I'm not learning much here, I don't know if anyone else is either because I can't speak for them)
>>17563276
(Me, getting cheeky for a change. A little bit of fallacies in there, for sure.)
>>17563308
(Ad Hominem, still not contributing to the topic of discussion that he claimed people weren't contributing to)
>>17563350
("Think about what you're doing")
>>17563373
(This is a little better, but it's still laden with some Ad Hominems)
>>17563758
wow you knew that! Why don't you tell me more! Surely you must have some incredible insights you can share with me
>>17563762 (continued)
>>17563406
(One of the few problems, in no particular order. Let's talk)
>>17563426
(I guess we're not talking)
>>17563430
>>17563440
(Ad Hominems. Also telling someone to read the thread, when not minutes earlier telling another anon to not "write a fucking novel" if they wanted a response)
>>17563469
>reread the thread then, sonny boy
>if you want a response
>don't write a fucking novel
All that nonsense lead to
>>17563491
>are you just bullshitting us in the end here
>>17563502
>>17563504
>tl;dr
>>17563534
>i will not subsidize your laziness, or ineptitude
>reread the thread then, sonny boy
>if you want a response
>don't write a fucking novel
>>17563547
(Spiteful, still shit-posting instead of staying focused and on topic... which he seems no longer interested in because he alludes to having typed all of it back at >>17563440)
>>17563606
(Good old Ad Hominem)
That's... what's here in the thread. This is de-railing it enough as it is.
>>17563804
>>17563762
this was an impressive deconstruction. I think you've proven that Akhenaten is a run of the mill faggot, fraud and assclown with nothing useful to say whatsoever.
>>17563762
i like how youve attributed other anons postijgs to me, that is so very honest of you.
and sweet fucking jesus you have a lot of time on your hands to be putting that kind of effort into trying to make me the bad guy.
Its just too bad you couldnt do it without being an underacheiving tryhard
>>17563842
new thread
>>17563820
>>17563804
samefag
>>17563820
Well, they/he might have something to say, like >>17563526 suggests. If he's not the one heading the conversation, then maybe he can at least be the one that provokes the rest of us to continue talking about the topic of the thread we're posting in instead of flinging dookie. Maybe it's just not coming out of Akhenaten at this point.
Maybe we really do have to take most of what he types with a grain of salt.
I mean, I can get behind >>17563621, and Akhenaten seems to get behind it too. He more or less offered some sort of explanation for his conclusions... I could go back and find the sources for this specific clam as well if anyone doesn't want to scroll back up and read through a lot of hypocrisy.
But, >>17563836.
Well, see, you're not the bad guy by default, or even at all, really. You're just a guy in the thread who happens to be behaving in such a way that a lot of anons would be giving you some pretty awful looks, were you situated in a room with them all. I also kind of separated you from the anons, and even myself. >>17563762 and >>17563804 are beholden to context that, I hope, satisfies the task given to me by >>17563644. Maybe you could say I put in the effort to defend what I might be positing.
Also... >>17563845
Still not the samefag.
Before the the Rosetta Stone and the work Jean-Francois Champollion, archeologists were highly concerned that the repeated patterns of Heiroglyphics could be the mark of an ancient tripfaggot.
yall are a bunch of teary-eyed little pussies who can dish it out but cant take it.
oh my delicate sensibilities are all afluster because someone disagreed with me!
i bet each of you were participation/consolation prize winners in grade school
>>17563921
(Snow Job, Ad Hominem, Strawman, Hasty Conclusion...)
I'm still here, friend.
>>17563921
and you are a grown man, and you spend your time like this, attacking people and reveling in the feeling of superiority it gives you; convinced you are always right and better than everyone, when neither is true.
This will be the last thread where I have to deal with his bullshit.
You're all wrong. It houses the stargate you fucks. Shit, don't y'all know the movie was a documentary. Kurt Russell actually killed some ayy lmaos and saved earth. Fucking /x/ I swear.
>>17558779
If anyone's interested, I found this fascinating. It's a tour of the giza plateau. There are apparently 4 levels of shafts and tunnels and no-one knows wtf they were for. Water? Sonic resonance?
Ignore the adverts, or not.
Part 1/4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba6G9vyhVFU&nohtml5=False
Part 2/4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vihLxTVGJ3Y&nohtml5=False
Part 3/4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKjGbCJfb9w&nohtml5=False
Part 4/4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HwvsOmmh3Q&nohtml5=False
>>17561107
The massive slabs of pink granite inside the king's chamber came from 500 miles away.
>>17562492
>Nothing mysterious
Sure thing. Then wtf is pic related, and where the fuck did all the pink granite on the inside come from? And why is there not one hyroglyph carved into anything inside? Where do all the machining marks come from? How were the tollerances on that stone box achieved without machining?
....Hmmm, that's kind of.... mysterious.
>>17558779
OP should also look into the Serapeum of Saqqara. That's a real head-scratcher.
Again, ignore the adverts at the beginning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8j9uHyDSH0s&nohtml5=False
>>17564777
The most interessant point is the lack of hyeroglyphs.
All else is just skilled work.
Also there is a new thread you midgets.
>>17560530
all these skills and you scrawl KHUFU haphazardly
once
kek
>>17564954
Huh?
I don't understand the purpose of this response... what was it supposed to achieve? Be a little more
>clear
