>>17538797
Aw, that was such a weak attempt at views for your shitty short film.

>>17538797
I think the idea is actually pretty good.

>>17538797
Okay idea, poorly executed. Camera switch was jarring, the dumb half-screamer at the end was snoozefest. Could've just been the first ten seconds or so and been fine.

>>17540473
pretty good imo

okay, that was pretty funny. though like >>17540473 said, it should have ended ten seconds in. it would actually work better as a gif than a video. also, consider changing the youtube thumbnail to something that doesn't immediately spoil the gag.

>>17538797
Idea is clever, execution is... not.
>>17540473
Maybe he should do a 5 minute video of someone playing around with their face swap and when they aren't looking at the camera have it get the face detection in the background.

Don't forget to use a shitty webcam and an ugly chick to make it authentic

>>17538797
I appreciate the concept more then the actual video