https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsKLXFlhk7s
I was born and raised a Christian, but it wasn't until late 2012 that I learned more of what it meant to be Christian, after taking heavy doses of shrooms. Since around the beginning of 2015, I began to get heavily into the occult. I was able to tap into psychic powers after studying alchemy and then smoking weed in nature, and meditating on alchemy. Throughout the last 3 years, and 2015 and early 2016 especially, I tried to learn all I could about religion, entheogens/other drugs, politics, history, chemistry, mythology, witchcraft/magic/grimoires, crystals/stones, herbs, miracles, angels, demons, divination, astrology and astronomy, the human condition, aliens, illuminati, biology, numerology, the after life and spiritual realm, metaphysics, hidden technology, chakras, astrology, other forms of mysticism, etc. I have come to the conclusion that we can never understand the wonders of God, and that by deluding ourselves and thinking that we can, we try and set ourselves up as gods in our own temple, which is inherently Satanism.
One of the most important things I have learned, is that faith really can move a mountain. According to the Bible, back in the day, some people were very well versed in sorcery. Well, my own consciousness has told me that magic/psychic power is unnecessary and self-serving. I believe that there is power in Jesus' name, that it can cast out demons, and that morality is from God. I encourage all to study the bible, even if they do not (yet) believe. It offers insights into metaphysics, numerology, and some other things. Christianity is the cure for nihilism. Without belief in eternal paradise, sin, holiness, etc., you will never be satisfied. You will be living in the world, and seeking it's ways. Our world right now is in trouble and we are doing nothing about it. I've known since taking shrooms in 2012 that we need to come together as a race, and give up materialism, and hate... (cont.)
Drugs? Check
Religious zealotry? Check
Delusions of grandeur? Check
OP, you are just a nutjob
>>17538093
Then the god depicted in the bible is going to publicly shame and throw all those that don't give in to him into an eternal lake of fire.
Why do you feel like that's a good thing? It's not even a punishment reserved for really evil stuff, all you have to do is refuse to acknowledge that biblical god.
>>17538093
I have two question Black plague and Diseases
Why then people asked for help everything god etc and they didin't get help ? Because you will say will of god medical research and doctors don't do anything .. it's just will of god you deserve to live.
Cut this bull crap people of aliens, god etc
Be just moral get fact after life is nothing you stop exist and treat all humans equal [This is starter pack next option are animals not all but hey some of it]
OP knows his shit. Reactonary bigots, btfo.
Daily reminder that the Shroud of Turin is in fact Jesus Christ's burial cloth.
>b-but the 1988 tests dated it back to the 13th century!
The sample was cut from a corner of the Shroud which was part of a later repair, the dating contradicts other evidence, the sample was contaminated by bacteria, smoke or reactive carbon and the calculations were done incorrectly. You can verify all of my statements.
New tests that have been carried out in the University of Padua's laboratories by professors from various Italian universities, led by Giulio Fanti, Italian professor of mechanical and thermal measurement at the University of Padua’s engineering faculty, have dated the fibres from the cloth to a period between 300BC to 400AD.
Summary of scientific and historical evidence supporting the authenticity of the Shroud:
http://www.newgeology.us/Shroud.pdf
Shroud-like coloration of linen by nanosecond laser pulses in the vacuum ultraviolet (it explains that they replicated the shroud's qualities using laser pulsations, which so far is the only way anyone has been able the replicate the shroud's qualities):
http://www.sindone.info/DILAZZA3.pdf
Studies on the radiocarbon sample from the shroud of Turin:
http://www.shroud.it/ROGERS-3.pdf
Nuclear imaging:
http://shroud.com/pdfs/whanger.pdf
http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/accett2.pdf
3D holographic information:
http://www.khouse.org/articles/2009/847/
http://www.ohioshroudconference.com/papers/p24.pdf
Raymond N. Rogers' observations and conclusions:
http://shroudnm.com/docs/2013-01-10-Yannick-Cl%C3%A9ment-Reflections-on-Ray-Rogers-Shroud-Work.pdf
Here's some secular peer-reviewed scientific journal articles on the Shroud of Turin:
http://shroud.typepad.com/topics/2005/10/secular_peerrev.html
>>17539763
>italians
Biased.
See if they ever let arab or chinese scientists analyze it.
>>17539785
>implying all italian scientists are catholics who believe in the Shroud
>>17539763
There's is also the Sudarium of Oviedo which is a separate artifact that as a head shroud makes a set with the burial shroud of Turin through matching bloodstains. When the evidence gets too pronounced of the truth of the Christ, the only thing left for those who suffer by its truth is obfuscations of evidence.
>>17539902
It's funny that you mention this because the ''Studies'' section on the Wikipedia article of the Sudarium only states:
>The cloth has been dated to around 700 AD by radiocarbon dating.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudarium_of_Oviedo#Studies
But if you look at the source (pdf below) provided in the ''Notes'' which is supposed to support that statement, you'll read:
>The sample from the Sudarium was dated to around 700 AD. Scientist César Barta spoke about the carbon dating process, emphasising the fact that if carbon dating is always absolutely accurate, then we could just as well finish the congress there and then. However, there were several points to bear in mind – in specialist carbon dating magazines, about half the samples dated come up with the expected date, around 30% with an “acceptable” date, and the other 20% is not what one would expect from archaeology.
>The laboratory used (via the National Museum in Madrid) said they were surprised by the result and asked if the cloth was contaminated with any oil based product, as oil is not cleaned by the laboratory processes used before carbon dating and if oil is present on a sample, the date produced by carbon dating is in fact the date of contamination. Finally, the history of the Sudarium is very well established and there are definite references to its presence in Jerusalem in AD 570 and at the beginning of the fifth century.
>As has already been mentioned, there are definite references to the Sudarium’s presence in Jerusalem in the 5th and 6th centuries, two hundred years before the carbon 14 date.
http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/n65part6.pdf
Gee! I wonder why the person who wrote the wiki article didn't include that additional information!
>>17539763
I suppose we can agree that the age of the cloth checks out, but how does any of this prove it is in fact the burial cloth of Jesus, instead of some other random person? Because it looks like him? Enlighten me, anon.
>>17538091
>Believes that Jesus from the Bible is the only answer to nihilism and he will bring everyone together
>Jesus throws everyone who does not answer to him into an eternal abyss of fire
Yeah buddy, your savior sounds SUPER inclusive. Way to convince me, man.
>>17540315
Watch 25:00 - 39:00 of this nice documentary about it (focuses on a team which accurately reconstructed his face based on the shroud, including Ray Downing who also created pic related), other interesting parts are 43:25-58:34 and 1:01:20 - 1:25:12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ff0P2IIsqY8
>>17540326
41:28 - 42:38 too
