I think he most certainly would have the funds and ability to find someone to do it, but I don't think he would, personally. Coming from a lifelong Beatles fan.

babbys first conspiracy?
look up project walrus , son

>>17536693
paul is dead

>>17537938
Now we have Faul McCartney

>>17536693
If he did, why wouldn't he have had M. Jackson killed for buying the Beatles catalog after he showed how to do it?

>>17538054
Because jackson was a smooth criminal.

>>17536693
> lennon
> visits US
> gets shot

There is no mystery.

>>17536693
I think John let Paul live, because he was misguided.

>>17538054
because that was Sony's job. don't you know anything about Michael Jackson conspiracies?

>>17538236
Smooth af

>>17538262
No.
>>17538236
So I'm gonna have to go with this.

>>17538249
Most plausible explanation, unfortunately

>>17536693
Not that it matters, but there's a movie called Chapter 27 about Chapman and the murder. Dude was insane and obsessive.

>>17536745
not op, but started looking into project walrus, soon found a connection to sal mineo and sirhan sirhan, crazy shit

I think Paul would have had him shot just for bringing in that retarded Jap bitch Yoko Ono.

>>17536693
No, I dont OP.