ATLANTIS GENERAL
- Home
- Board: /x/ - Paranormal
- Reading: ATLANTIS GENERAL
Does it exist?
>>17439349
Yes, but it's greatly exaggerated.
>>17439349
no, it's just a myth
>>17439349
i think u auto-corrected Atlanta Georgia. And yes, its fucking horrifying
>>17439391
>>17439398
/thread
>>17439349
Yes. It was probably a technological-occult empire. It's probably the reason god flooded the earth.
Do you guys seriously not understand that Atlantis was an allegory?
As for a hidden / lost civilization? Yeah, something like that likely existed.
>>17439401
Upon reentry, my sides seem to have burned up.
>>17439349
Yes the Atlantic ocean exists.
>>17439430
nah, if you actually read the greek texts, they existed, they definitely existed, and it wouldn't surprise me if it was pompeii or something similar.
It's an allegory of hubris: the city that fancy itself modern and with it but is filled with vice and treachery doesn't last. Pompeii got taken out by a volcano for its plethora of brothels and sexually deviant behavior.
The first real Atlantis is going to be Charleston, SC as it's slowly being submerged. Payment for being the capital of the American slave trade and profiting grossly through the misery of slavery.
>>17439349
thats the apocalypse you fucking idiot and yees it exist. its in egypt
>>17439349
Plato is the only source for the history of Atlantis. I believe nobody before the Modern Era ever interpreted Plato as literally on this one, not even his disciples. Plato had other interesting myths besides Atlantis, why do people obsess about this one?
>>17439349
It most likely did. As did multiple other ancient civilizations tens of thousands of years ago. How advanced they were is definitely up for discussion, though I doubt they were in even close to where we are now. However they probably had knowledge of a multitude of things that remain undiscovered still in our times.
Yeah, its off the north eastern coast of the Azores.
There even a pyramid 30m underwater
It was a grouping of islands not a huge continent
>>17440074
It was placed west of "the pillars of Hercules" and that's where Spain and morocco are the closest to touching
Go googly earth and you'll see it with its mountain peaks poking out of the water. It has an almost triangular looking shape to it
If Global warming keeps up like this they might find some settlements in Antarctica
I know about the exact location of Atlantis,ask me anything.
>>17440834
where is it?
>>17440834
was it in the chicxulub crater site
>>17440848
its in the ocean floor
noahs ark and the flood? deluge?
what really blew my mind is indians are asian people, from the pacific ocean. pacifists...
>>17440903
Durr durr 12 year old detected
>>17440916
xD le reddit!!
You have the Lymaria portal around Mt Shasta and you have the Atlantis Portal in Florida.
You see Catpeople (and other Lemeurian types) in Mt. Shasta (this is mysticism by the way) and you see Seehorses shaped people in Florida (and other Atlantian forms)
It's like Spirit Animals. You see their faces morph into whatever "higher soulset" they are channeling" (and acting like) My Rainbow (travelling name) was Koala. Because that's the Animal I was channeling and acting like in human form.
>>17439349
In sweden we have promethean remnants
>>17440958
What is that? Fire?
>>17439349
I heard you can still see where it was on Google maps
>>17439409
> not reading Genesis or The Book of Enoch
>not knowing God flooded the Earth because Angels lusted after, and created offspring with mortal women
>God chose Noah because his bloodline remained "pure"
>>17439848
>Pompeii
>utopian civilization
>town most known for its hundreds of brothels and street wine vendors
>favored by Roman soldiers as a vacation spot to rail out women and get trashed
OK.
>>17441171
That's exactly an Utopia bruh.
>>17441306
I find Utopia to be socially independent and also educated in general both politically, spiritually.
>>17440809
Alanteans turned their Island into a flying fortress to leave behind the barbaric people of the Middle East . While exploring the South Polar regions the extreme cold caused a mechanical break down and they were forced to land there. Every thing froze up and was inescapable . The people are many hundreds of feet below the surface frozen in time.
>>17441341
Great job, you almost managed to do a language there, buddy!
>>17439349
Atlantis had technologically advanced pretty far. They were a civilization like any other.. It was lost to time, as many other great civilizations. They are not mer-folk, nor did they have spaceships.. But for their time they did good. All empires fade, it is the way of life.
The myths about them were just because people .. well, are people. Look at our whole 'reptilian' thing going on.
>>17442398
kek'd heartily.
>>17439349
I'm pretty sure it's written somewhere it was a concept used by Platos or Aristotle as a comparison to their empire at the time
I thought Atlantis was supposedly on the western coast of Spain in what is present day swampland.
>>17439867
If profiting from the slave trade is what causes a land to sink beneath the waves then why hasn't West Africa and the middle East long since vanished?
>>17444276
The myth of Atlantis begins with the Greek Dark Ages and the fall of the Minoan empire. 5000 years ago the Cretan islands that made up their empire were flooded after a volcanic eruption leaving the Minoans easy prey for the Peloponnesian Greeks.
>>17442900
wtf man, that's sorta creepy
what's with the names of those underwater ?pryamids?
>>17441341
you talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded
who knows, but the Indiana Jones game about it was pretty cool
>>17441162
This. But it could still be that it was some occult place in that time. Maybe contained some far out of their time technology created by fallen angels. But it wasn't important for us to know.
>>17440074
>>17440101
this right here
>>17445771
I'm sorry but that is Hy Brasil.
>>17441162
You don't understand the genesis and the book of enoch as well as I understand it. He also destroyed everything because they were doing genetic experiments. Making new, horrible animals like pure carnivores and animal-human hybrids like the Moabites who were body of men and heads of lions.
>>17445796
No it's Antillia
Nonetheless no word on the book of Enoch in the Bible. Don't know if it's legit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seewarte_Seamounts
>>17445771
This is correct, some google earth analysis back in the day revealed underwater ruins as well.
>are there sunken cities?
Yes
>are there magical, futuristic sunken cities?
Probably not
>>17447739
"futuristic"
Look at when the oldest anatomically modern human skeleton was found
Look at what happen when a giant comet hit the ice cape at the end of the last ice age
There could be advanced civilizations that god wiped that, why is that so hard to believe?
>>17448327
Because there would still be artifacts from said civilizations.
If you took New York City right now, as an example, and ground it up into a fine sand, the trace elements of the city would still be there. The tempered steel, the plastics, the ceramics that make up the whole of the infrastructure. And this is before we even get into the chemical wastes. It would linger hundreds of thousands of years. We'd be finding more space junk, since it's extremely unlikely that a prior advanced civilization would ignore the benefits of satellites. There'd probably be leftover radioactive hot spots. That sort of thing.
>>17448362
And there ARE artifacts from old as fuck civilizations, look up Gobekli Tepe, tell me how they build that, and included animals that dont even exist in that area.
What about old maps, that according to the mapper is made from following even OLDER maps, that include Antarctica and the sizes of the continents are relatively accurate??
Also, civilizations mostly centre around coastlines, thats how we humans do shit. When that comet hit the Icecap and caused a sudden insane melting of the miles thick ice, everything on the path of the wave would get raped.
>>17448368
I think you misunderstand what I mean by artifacts, but no, your "how did people move big stones" complaint holds no water. I must have posted a thousand times here all the many, many examples of pre-industrial humans doing that over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over that it's just gotten ridiculous to hear anyone try and argue, "they couldn't do that." They could and they did.
So for artifacts you have some stones that are at best about 15k years old, and that's a stretch, that show no advanced sciences, no metallurgy, no advanced architecture, nothing that isn't properly stone age and a dubious map.
NOT CONVINCING. To the sane and educated, at least, to eager to believe 14 year olds it's probably sufficient evidence.
>>17448376
Thats the fucking point, they could and they did.
How is that not a sign of massive civilization? According to most scientists, people were just hunter gathered, and yet they could organize a fuck ton of people to move block as huge as 1000 tons? really?
Most stones are older than 15k years old by the way
The pyramids ARE advanced as fuck, and the sphinx by the way shows signs of water erosion.
Look at this : https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/3b/a7/a2/3ba7a2115e5979c52de385ec06934d79.jpg How did they do that, how do you suppose? Can we do that now? Yes we can, ake massive blocks, and slice/shape them to fit like that, takes a lot of time and advanced technique.
The sphinx water erosion : http://www.davidpbillington.net/southwallwestlarge.jpg
GO google for yourself how far back you have to go before theres a long ass period of rain in Egypt.
Also, go for yourself and see how devastating that comet was 12000 years ago. That situation could easily remove any evidence of our civilization and send our grand kids back to being gatherers
>>17448394
Perhaps we have two distinct meanings of advanced civilization at work here. If you mean something with, say, a Ptolemaic level of advancement then I'd acquiesce to that possibility, although I'd still consider it slim.
I thought by advanced it was meant to be, "at least as technologically capable as mankind today," to which I would contend is implausible to the point of being impossible.
>>17445771
That's on the mid-atlantic ridge - a chain of volcanic vents where new Earth is bubbling up from the mantle. In other words, that bump of mountain is newer than Spain, not the remnants of some older land mass that sunk. And actually, the Azores archipelago is right on the triple junction of three plates, so there's lots of volcanic activity to make those bumps and islands.
>>17445962
>>17447681
A mass of land that large - even if it "sunk" - would be easily seen by satellite mapping of the sea bed.
>>17448398
Why the fuck is the chance f that slim to you? Do you have any idea how old the oldest anatomically human skeleton is? People just like US, same sized brain etc
You like many others have this weird idea where we are the best of us theres ever been, a very ego driven standpoint.
The idea that they could be at least at technologically advanced as us doesnt seem far to me either, not at all. How long did it take for us to develop this modern world? Shit changed real fast all of the sudden. WE human beings have been here since ca 200k years ago, we got all this shit in a few hundred years.
Your main problem in grasping this is, you underestimate how severe that huge comet fucked the planet. A massive comet hit the miles thick icecap, causing an extreme melting and ALL that water flushed outwards to the sea, taking all civilizations on the coast, causing hundreds of feet of sea level rise in the matter of minutes, and a massive earthquake as well
>>17448414
It's slim because age does not equal technological advancement, something you appear to believe does correlate.
>>17448414
>You like many others have this weird idea where we are the best of us theres ever been, a very ego driven standpoint.
No it isn't. The current evidence supports the conclusion that mankind currently sits at its technological peak. That's not "ego" that's reason and evidence.
>>17448414
>The idea that they could be at least at technologically advanced as us doesnt seem far to me either, not at all
I already explained why it was, but you didn't read that part. Sift through the soil across the world. If there were a prior point where mankind reached this stage, you'd almost certainly find plastics. You'd definitely find evidence of advanced metallurgy. We don't. That's effectively proof positive.
>>17448414
>Your main problem in grasping this is, you underestimate how severe that huge comet fucked the planet
No, I don't have any problem grasping your idea. I'm explaining why it's wrong. A comet wouldn't erase all traces of plastics and smelted metal alloys. Ever. It'd have to destroy the Earth to do that.
>>17448437
age does not equal technological advancement. What would keep them from advancing?
you then assume that other civilizations will use the same shit as we do and run it the same way. You assume they also would have used plastics, make metal alloys etc.
>>17439874
>the apocalypse is in Egypt
Chhhhhoooooooccccccchhhhh
>>17444302
False. The Minoans were culturally subsumed by the mainland Mycenaean Greeks.
>>17441162
the book of enoch wasnt included in the bible because all of the real books of the bible were known by the church by around 100-150 ad
the bible is the most accurate history book in the world and its also the most documented manuscript of antiquity by far
>>17441171
google the grafitti of pompeii, it was literally a horde of faggots
>>17448451
No, I don't ASSUME any of that. I know it for a fact. We're talking about technological levels here and no one, I mean no one, putters about in the stone or iron age if technological alternatives are available. No society, given the opportunity to make steel, says, "naw, that's not for us!" And what alternatives? To quote the old line, you can't get there from here. There's a technological step up. You don't get to plastics without metallurgy, etc. There's no alternative to these things available that you can reach without first indulging in those steps.
So, corralled within the realm of plausibility, there'd be metal alloys. Your technological civilization that didn't advance its technology makes for a remarkably poor argument.
>>17448656
how the fuck can you know that for a fact?
>>17448672
Being informed about chemistry, physics and engineering. Just think about it. Where the fuck do these magical alternatives to these things come from and how would it be that in this iteration of technological development humanity entirely overlooks them. In our history we've been pretty brazen about trying just about every stupid idea and technique that comes to mind. But somehow there's this whole alternative industrial method equal to but entirely removed from ANY of the chemical sciences we've ever discovered that the species latched onto last go around?
At this point we might as well be talking about aliens and fairies and how the Loch Ness monster built the pyramids. The conjecture completely jumps the rails.
>>17448677
you again assume that we would have come across everything m8.
you still cant know it for a fact by the way
Good old Danu Talis.
The peaks are very visible, and people live there.
>>17448690
And again, no, I don't assume and insomuch as we can know anything for a fact, I know that for a fact. You're clutching at impossibilities.
The material world has rules and limitations and if you study it for a little bit you can find some pretty prominent barriers. Just because you don't want them to exist doesn't mean they're not there and not observable.
Once you know a few of these, it becomes quite apparent that your society of technologically advanced humans on Earth who somehow managed to entirely eschew the whole fields of materials and chemical engineering as we understand them while using equally good alternatives that look, upon reduction, just like naturally occurring chemicals? That's less likely than "Bigfoot did it." And yes, educated people can and do know this for a fact. If you're claiming you don't know this for a fact, that's just telling people you're not well versed in this shit.
>>17447681
thats what im saying. theres a pyramid under the water about 30m completely lined with a smooth stone and a crystal looking capstone
>>17449013
Source?
>>17449275
nigga, they have a website
www azores - pyramid org /
niga what
>>17450716
Just in general, or...?
>>17441162
Was that Enoch guy the first human to commit the sin of auto-genital manipulation for self pleasure?
>>17441171
Pompeii and Herculaneum was a replay of Sodom and Gonorea.
so does it exist?
>>17439867
No. I cast my vote to first real American Atlantis for New Orleans, LA.
>>17452623
yes. but only the remnants remain under water
check out >>17449676
>>17439401
Can confirm
>>17440950
What the fuck?
>>17452948
Furry shit I reckon.
>>17439867
Fuck off sjw faggot, the whole world would need to sink then because slavery's been everywhere
>>17440950
full blown schiz
>>17441341
HAHAHA FAGGOT. YOU SOUND LIKE A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL TRYING TO SOUND LIKE AN INTELLECTUAL LOL
"According to the archaeologists studying the pyramids on the island of Pico, Azores, they seem to be oriented to the stars. Some of the pyramids do have inside chambers not yet explored"
>>17454434
"One of the 140 pyramids observed by the archeologists in the Madalena area of Pico Island, Azores. Some of these structures reach about 13 meters (43 feet) high"
sorry, wrong picture
>>17454451
"Recent additional archaeological findings in the Azores support the evidence of earlier human occupation of the islands. Last year, archaeologist Nuno Ribeiro revealed having found rock art on the island of Terceira, which he also believes predates the arrival of the Portuguese by many thousands of years."
Knock it off, Egypt, deserts can't swim.
>>17439881
What else anon?
Yes. The land used to be prosperous until another meteor hit earth and magnetic fields changed and the city was frozen and submerged under massive floods.
Now below antarctica
>>17444559
*Cue in xfiles theme song*
>>17454458
Then why so much sand at the bottom of the ocean?
>>17455202
What better place for a desert to hide than under loads of water? Almost got away with it, too.
>>17455253
If it hadn't been for you meddling archaeologists!
>>17455606
And here we come to the inevitable tit-squeeze of defeat. "You there, titty! To what conclusions may we come in regards to Atlantis??" The boob sits as still as anything can. "The thread needs real information, not just giant stone titties from stupid, boring Egypt!" Boobs, gentlemen. Boobs.
>>17455202
it drowned
>>17456688
Thanks now I have to change my pants
>>17439349
Yes it is real and so is Lemuria and anything you say will not convince me otherwise.
>>17457425
Do you need a nap and some tendies?
>>17439881
I've read from a book that the ancient Gaulois and British druids of back then believed Atlantis to have been located at the north of Britain
Also, Plato got his story from his grandfather
>>17457437
>tendies
>>17448578
Shut the fuck up fucking biblethumping faggot
>>17440074
>There even a pyramid 30m underwater
no there isn't
>>17441341
*tips fedora*
>>17439349
If you looked at how it all started and try to track it down, it's just a dead end leading to some guy claiming that Egyptians told him.
But be my guest, and start on the search, it's silly but a fun one.
THE IDEA OF ATLANTIS
Long ago before we knew civilization existed there was a city that had such advanced technology that we today could not even comprehend its existence. This city was at the Apex of Human civilization and boasted the collective knowledge of mankind. After its fall pieces of this knowledge were kept to rebuild once the flood waters receded and thus arose a new culture Babylon. Babylon came after Atlantis but its essence it was the same. Although much of the knowledge was kept it was made hidden for the first time in humanities history as to prevent the disastrous outcomes of the former. The Bible recalls that Babylon was scattered and its Mystery schools were forever broken in the four winds of the earth. There arose new languages and cultures from the original. The fragmented pieces are as of yet untethered but eventually would come together again under a common language. The esoteric made manifest once again under the language of symbols.
I would speculate as to what technology they possessed. Perhaps they found ways to mess with the human genome and create hybrids that were not fully human and yet moreso. There are various legends of gods, heros and Nephilim giants in virtually every culture suggest that this may be the case as higher dimensional beings are said to have interbred with women.
>>17448765
please look at this and it will maybe open your mind a little bit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkTj-NwLG0Y
>110 replies
>no mention of Antediluvian babes
Y'all motherfuckers need Donovan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcUlQAfJuXE
>>17439349
Doggerland = Atlantis
Not disputable.
>>17439349
Of course, Anon; it exists in our hearts.
>>17442386
>Flying fortress
>>17439349
yes and it sank 11000 years ago.
survivors moved aroun to tibet peru and turkey.
they created lifeforms with their advanced technology.it seems some of them are agarthans
>>17448754
The great Crystal pyramid is between Sao Miguel and Terceira.
>>17460164
pangea maybe?
i personally think its the atlantic ocean floor
but wouldnt it make sense if it was pangea also? pangea would have been a single island on a world filled with water
>>17439349
Yes it exist.
>>17457514
one is for sure. gravity manipulation.
to lift and then move 100 or even 1000 ton single piece stones is just not possible
>>17460555
Kill yourself. Kill yourself because you are a retard and worse, you're committed to remaining a retard.
>>17457449
I've had a similar idea in my mind for years, would you care to share which book, anon? I'm truly curious.
>giant patch of land below sea level
>natural earth dam breaks because melting of ice
>everybody gets fucked by water
>so became the black sea
>story passes on
>gets more crazy everytime
>thousands of years later plato tells a story about a high tech civ that got swalowed by the sea.
its not that hard guys.
>>17460563
except, you know, its doable.
we just dont have the tech to get it powerful enough
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7ZabuaPm6E
>>17439349
Yes, we know it as Doggerland.
>>17445899
>Pure carnivores
Lions? Alligators? Piranha? Crocodiles? Sharks? Birds of prey? Other reptiles? Spiders?
Those bastards.
