Do virtuous agnostics go to Hell or Limbo when they die?
>>17367679
hell, just like the buddhist and every other heretic
only christ can save you
>>17367679
Hell. But just the sort of first part, where there are gardens and music and it's pretty chill.
Neither since it's impossible to go somewhere that doesn't exist.
>>17367679
Believing in an after life is autistic. Just die in peace you silly goose. Also naruto sucks
>>17367679
Virtuous life cannot lead you lower. But your point of view may be shitty confusing virtue with nonvirtue.
>>17367679
>Bg 9.20 — Those who study the Vedas and drink the soma juice, seeking the heavenly planets, worship Me indirectly. Purified of sinful reactions, they take birth on the pious, heavenly planet of Indra, where they enjoy godly delights.
>Bg 9.21 — When they have thus enjoyed vast heavenly sense pleasure and the results of their pious activities are exhausted, they return to this mortal planet again. Thus those who seek sense enjoyment by adhering to the principles of the three Vedas achieve only repeated birth and death.
Living morally is a symptom of spirituality, but having the morals without the spirit is as pointless and materially trapping as being immoral. You'll get a better material life, better senses to enjoy materially, perhaps even reaching Heavenly planets, but you will stay in the cycle of samsara, and always be at risk of falling into more suffering.
According to Dante, all virtuous agnostics and virtuous nonchristians go to limbo.
>>17368201
Yeah, but he was a poet, politician andpundit, not a theologian...
>>17367679
Everything goes to god; there is only god.
>>17367679
Limbo was never an official doctrine of the Catholic Church, and it was killed for sure by Benedict XVI in Apr 2007.
So, nope.
>>17368201
Dante was a pretentious fuck
>>17367679
>implying eternal hell is real
>>17367733
'Beelieve it!'
Limbo was cancelled by a Pope few years ago
>>17367705
This
>>17368800
>>17369514
>"Well I've got a dinosaur that EATS forcefield dogs!"
>>17367679
Hell. Virtuous agnosticism is an oxymoron. If they were smart enough to be righteous they wouldn't be too dumb to know for certain that god exist and what he's like.
>>17367679
neither neither
>>17367679
Hell, just like the rest of the infidels.
>>17367679
Neither. When you die your soul is 'recycled' and you reincarnate. However reincarnation is not random and it depends on your karma. For example, think of karma as points in a video game. If you have a lot of points then you will be able to have a lot of benefits. Good people will be born as healthy humans. Appearance, wealth, personality also is a factor to this. Bad people obviously don't have a lot of these points and thus will reincarnate as a human in a completely different situation. If you are a very very horrible person then you will not reincarnate as a human at all and you will be born in the 'lesser' chain; animals, insects, etc.
>>17369501
Interesting afaik 'believe it' was a mistranslation of a japanese nonsense saying naruto said in the original version into english. So basically a phrase like golly horribly disfigured in the translating process
>>17367679
Nobody knows, because no person can prove that hell of limbo does exist and nobody but a deity can know where they'll go.
>>17367733
I think autists are more likely to question the existence of God and the afterlife.
>>17370259
This is what indoctrination looks like.
>>17370259
>>17370259
it's actually the opposite, you can look it up yourself. this is coming from an agnostic/ignostic
