alt history

Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
alt history 2016-01-31 03:14:50 Post No. 17294984
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: clock.jpg (116 KB, 708x475) Image search: [Google]

alt history Anonymous 2016-01-31 03:14:50 Post No. 17294984 [Report]

Apparently a large chunk of history didn't even happen, or was entirely made up?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_time_hypothesis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_(Fomenko)

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-31 03:16:13 Post No.17294989
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-31 03:16:13 Post No.17294989 [Report]

>>17294984
So HP Lovecraft?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-31 03:16:44 Post No.17294995
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-31 03:16:44 Post No.17294995 [Report]

listen to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cIJEbJ9BrM

or watch these:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJk0yT4erxuSEyHu-0wfUQ0WulbjtWJOu

>>

Timeline (ID: !5EJ71eKlNQ) 2016-01-31 03:21:35 Post No.17295012
[Report]

Timeline (ID: !5EJ71eKlNQ) 2016-01-31 03:21:35 Post No.17295012 [Report]

>>17294984
Yes, most histories that outlaw time travel witness the null power effect.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-31 03:55:32 Post No.17295182
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-31 03:55:32 Post No.17295182 [Report]

>>17294984
Radioactive dating cares not for calendars. It gives a number of years with a ± margin of error.

So people can fuck with calendars and dates all they want, but if the dating says x is 2000 years old, its a fair assumption that x is about 2000 years old.