How is it that /x/ manages to pull off BETTER discussions than a website, say for, Only magick or for Only astral projection?
>>17132299
It does...? mmmmmhmhmhmhmhmhm
>>17132299
dubs!
It's cause the bar for discussion is so god damn low. /x/ may herp derp all over its self, but at least it rarely drools down its chin as it does so. Which sadly, is better than most.
Magick only is clearly about practical uses.
When you go up to a person and ask "what can you do for me" how do they respond?
You'll only get good answers from hookers that way.
>>17132335
>at least it rarely drools down its chin as it does so
You are joking, right?
>>17132395
There are sites that sell rocks that supposedly infused with the spirit of a suckybus. And there are people who pay real money for those rocks.
>where you are now you can't even imagine what the bottom will be like.
>>17132606
And the people who believe in that shit make up the core user base of /x/.
/x/ is the bottom of the barrel. Where the idiots congregate.
>>17132299
>/x/
>manages to pull off BETTER discussions than anything
Are we talking about same /x/?
>>17132696
>/x/ is the bottom of the barrel. Where the idiots congregate.
You're posting here so I guess it's true.
Thanks to anonymity. Most forums/websites let you pick an avatar and establish an identity. In that kind of environment, hierarchies usually end up forming and attention whoring fags/cuckold mods end up ruining any chance of having a good discussion because the entire forum has to revolve around them.
>>17133061
As someone who's been visiting this site on and off for 8 years. Anon is a relentless shitposter who shouldn't be trusted on any topic you couldn't look up on wikipedia anyway.
There are many many disciplines represented here as well as a healthy number of skeptics
>>17133098
/pol/, /v/ and /fit/ seem too high
