So, did America really land on the moon, or not?
https://youtu.be/U8TDsywfa-U
>>17068185
Aerospace fag here, yes we landed on the god damn moon, the fucking laser ranging mirrors are still fucking there.
>>17068185
Of course you did not, and jet fuel do not melt steel beams.
>>17068194
>laser ranging mirrors
Um, Lasermaker fag here, don't need mirrors to range objects with lasers. This is a myth.
>>17068212
Umm, no shit? I'm not saying that to range it, I'm saying that cuz they're on the moon.
As in, we've been there, which is relevant to the question, unlike you. Where did you go to school, buttfucking institute of fucking morons youfucking shithead?
>>17068185
With the convincing moonlander
>>17068246
>>17068194
Theres naturally occurring reflecting material on the moon tho.
>>17068257
But you don't understand, the fucking mirrors are there.
>>17068185
The issue hasn't ever been if, but when (unless you really, really like this conspiracy).
>>17068265
Have you seen the mirrors on the moon?
>>17068246
You know there's metal underneath right, I mean it isn't that hard to understand...
>>17068265
Proove it you cock mongling window licker
>>17068272
>hurr durr prove there are mirrors on the moon, but I'm not going to believe and if your proof
>>17068271
But why is there one piece of tape holding the horizontal to the vertical
>>17068241
Calm down
>>17068275
Ill believe your proof but no one elses
Even if Apollo 11 was faked America still went there later, when no other country ever did.
You'd think some other country, the Russians, would make their own fake moon landing, but no one since ever has.
>>17068280
90% just fucking around mate.
>>17068272
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
>>17068270
My anecdote wouldn't matter anyway, you can reflect lasers off them.
>>17068276
That's kapton tape, very important because its low outgassing rate. A ton of the insulation was kapton actually, and believe it or not, it sucked dick. It was just the most thermal stable for the time, and again, doesn't outgas. Niel Armstrong even commented on the amount of material that was shed from the lander upon ascent.
It looks shitty, because it IS shitty honestly. The lander made touchdown based on elevation markers directly imprinted to the window, no fancy HuD or guidance systems. It was a space race, the tech is old and shoddy, but they made due to beat the filthy commies.
>>17068185
That guy looks nothing like Stanley Kubrick, and he doesn't have his voice.
>>17068185
Why is it so unbelievable? Landing on the moon isn't as hard as you think, I've done it like a dozen times in Kerbal Space Program.
>>17068212
Um, mirror fag here.
How can mirrors be real if your eyes aren't?
>>17068185
That's not Stanley Kubrick, you cum guzzler.
Nope. Crazy I know but this is a part of a broader agenda that's been in place to put space into your consciousness so they can pull off the ayyy lmao deception and make you worship the beast thinking it's an alien here to solve all of the problems they created.
/thread
>>17068364
>>17068398
You don't actually know that it's crazy if you still believe it. You know that it's impossible and absurd. Your not sane because you know it sounds crazy, you're insane because you still believe it.
>>17068434
I follow Satan anyways, I am an artist that enjoys cartoons and there is nothing more demonic than cartoons, no joke.
>>17068434
That must be why Wernherer von Braun said on his death bed that the ayy-lmaos are going to be used in a one-world-order power-play hoax.
>>17068364
>>17068426
And somebody recently made an OP saying /x/ didn't have memes...
>>17068185
Yes we did.
>>17068185
late to the party, what was on the video?
I think we did.
>>17068632
>babby's first try at editing video
>some old guy named Tom saying NASA paid him to fake the moon landing
>>17068632
Blurry shaky video with a old bearded guy (who does not, in fact, look at all like Stanley Kubrick) talking to another guy off camera and saying he filmed the faked moon landing. The title was something along the lines of "Stanley Kubrick admits to filming fake moon landing"
>>17068185
Short answer yes.
Long answer yyyyyyyeeeeeeeeesssss
The editing was so fucking bad. Holy shit. Hoooly shit. I wonder what the guy's motive was? Was he actually trying to fool people? He had raw footage from the fake interviews on his weird youtube channel where he's giving instructions to the faux-Kubrick.
>>17068194
Russians placed a retrospective as well
But used robots
So I guess L.P. means did we send a manned mission
>>17068185
That may be a discusion but lets talk about the transmition. Electronics some times have no word, even right know in the Earth a satalite comunication is hard. Neil Armstrong was going to land on the moon live. Come on. Thats just plain bs, the transmition could have fall and tat would make us look like fools before the SU. So they played the save way and tape a landing, i do not that if in the moon or in the Arizona desert but that was not a live transmision. It was too risky.
Bruh how there be footprints on da moon when there be no atmosphere on da moon think about it for a minute.. Also the Russians and Americans are friends they just put on a show to make the public think they don't like each other when in fact they share underground bunkers together throughout the US
>>17070400
>transmition.
Get out.
>>17068185
What you should had asked is; why isn't the moon moving in its original order?
There was no super moon in 1900s, in fact it haven't been one in the past 3000 years
>>17068185(You)
Yeah no way in hell we went there, and if we did these are the astronauts who did it below, yeah right..
https://youtu.be/LAbpWaDL4Zc
Retroreflectors... not ordinary mirrors.
What benefit does pretending the moon-landing was fake brings about?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA
>>17070508
> shows a dodgy little line graph with a spike that a 10yo could draw in MS Paint
Wow, I'm blown away. >_>
>>17068185
the moon landed on america
>>17068246
>>17068248
Where are the stars
>>17070687
>what is photographic exposure
