We are nothing more than a computer simulation. This is the only logical belief
In that case, please delete yourself and let the rest of us enjoy our simulated little lives.
>>16957846
Behold, the lord of the edge.
>>16957850
>>16957968
I seriously can't get over this belief.
>>16957975
Then don't just don't be an edgelord about it. Give examples or something. The post as it is now reeks of highschool, fedoras and mt dew
So? You're sentient regardless of whether you're made of code or atoms, that's what really matters.
Besides, if this is a simulation maybe we can learn to hack into reality and become gods.
>>16957846
Fractals are the answer. Read 'The fractal geometry of nature' from Maldenbrot.
>>16957846
ayyy
>computer simulation
>aliens are tech support
>have you tried lmao'ing it off and on
>>16959400
good joke, nice doubles
we think of a computer simulation because we cannot understand what could be more far than that, its probably much more complicated than this, anon.
>>16957846
You gotta stop listening to late night radio anon.
Also this >>16959400
>>16959436
>>16958070
>>16957968
you people, need to think more
>>16959400
fuckin killed me
Yet if I parrot the same shit thats been said a million times its a problem.
People, THINK.
>>16957846
ah look who's back to get laughed out of /x/ again. The tween who claims to be a physics PhD
Think if irrational numbers like pi. The moment they repeat or stop then we know were in a simulation
>>16958155
The characters in the game/simulation can't even begin to comprehend the computer that is running them -- never mind the parts of the computer; the store the computer was bought in; or the factory who made the CPU; the circuitboards, the electricity, the tin that makes up the solder. Is the computer that runs this simulation anything similar to what we know in here? What is "out" there? We will never know. Characters in games cannot interact with the outside world.
With that in mind, we probably can't "hack" the universe as we know it, but experiencing glitches could be probable, providing we are actually living in a computed simulation.
>>16959606
Animatrix is the shit.
I've actually enjoyed some of the Animatrix shorts more than I enjoyed the movies.
yeah I listened to art bell last night too
>>16959526
>i'm a retard
Yup, we know.
>>16957846
>We are nothing more than a computer simulation. This is the only logical belief
And?
>>16957846
>This is the only logical belief
Why? Care to explain?
>>16957846
What is to say that the plug hasn't been pulled on the universe already multiple times?
>Oh hey Ted I see you turned your server back on
>"Yeah it's been 11,000 years but to these guys it feels like one second"
Hold me.
>>16959445
>DA MATRIX
>ok, but why?
>LOL TRY USIGN YOUR BRAINS
>>16957846
See the thing is you take it from a "logical" standpoint.
Everyone who believes in something, always get that feelings that they are right.
The Christian who grew up religious most certainly will deny the atheist,
While the atheist theist growing up non religious will deny the Christian.
You just have to stop, and just accept that anything could be possible.
Only then do you leave.
>>16959916
It actually becomes the only logical belief once we ourselves create a simulation that can be experienced by the AI as "life".
Once that happens its like a 95% chance that we are in a simulation with a 95% chance that the simulation is also inside another simulation. And so on, and so forth.
Have you ever seen the micrpverse episode of Rick and Morty?
>>16960123
>It actually becomes the only logical belief once we ourselves create a simulation that can be experienced by the AI as "life".
How is that? Just because we can copy something doesn't mean that we ourselves are a copy. Logically, that becomes A possibility, not a the ONLY possibility.
>Once that happens its like a 95% chance
Where do you get that number from?
>>16960119
See!!
This is why we need communism back. Keep these fucking nutters in place.
>>16957846
Who is behind the computer, who's this silent, invisible being that witnesses and operating us?
I've feel it could be a possibility that we crazy, glowy, inter dimensional beings that created another world inside of a program that we live in for a while and wake up with the knowledge and experience from the life we lived.
>>16959400
>>16960133
Not him, but I think the high figure is based on these assumptions
>At some point humanity will create perfectly simulated universes
>That most if not all advanced species in the universe will do the same at some point
>So now you have billions of simulated universes inside one universe
>If our universe is like this, than others are too
>Even the simulated universes we create
So for every 1 "real" universe, there exists an infinite chain of simulated universes being created, and inside those simulations are chains of other simulations...
Which means the probability that you are inside a "real" universe is very slim.
Right now that whole theory is just a fun brain exercise. But if the day comes when we actually create a simulated universe, then our entire outlook on that idea will change. That it IS possible, and probably likely that we ourselves are in one as well.
>>16960139
Some bored asshole browsing 4chan in another window.
>>16957846
>tfw not programmed good enough to get the women
fuck
>>16959976
so...
everything in the nature is based on a mathematical formula, the fractals are everywhre, and based also on this formula.
fractals where discovered, yes discovered, because a computer failed doing a calculus back in the 70s, why we discover a thing that is everywhere, from the shells of the snails to the composition of almost every single galaxy?
now there are some glitches or failures, because the fractals are the thing that roots the nature, fractals are the proof that we are based on some mathematical simulation, if we discover the end of the number pi (3.14) that would be a sign that our universe is a digital simulation.
>so there you go, anon
>sorry for my bad english, im spanish and just waked up from bed
>>16961241
You guys are just proving intelligent design not a simulated universes
>>16961264
Behing every design there must be a ordenator being.
