It's based on a true story.

Didn't ghost busters make that up?

>>16933274
No, I think it originated in spirit photography from the early 20th century.

bump for interest

>>16933262
>>16933267
It's all you can eat

>>16933835
Why is it that whenever a thread gets posted that's something besides "why is the earth flat" or "how do I get my typos to have sex with me", it gets flooded with shit posts? Do you guys enjoy this board being only roleplaying garbage with no variety whatsoever?

>>16933849
Typos was meant to be tulpas. That's kind of ironic.

>>16933262

Considered a parlor trick which is no longer attempted now that seances are no longer all the rage and technology and critical thinking (thanks to scientific advancement) has stopped people from "playing along". Nowadays if someone saw an ectoplasm stunt going on during a seance they would probably reach out and grab the cheesecloth like snatching a fake beard off Santa. It's one thing for that to happen during the era of original flash photography, it's another in an era where everyone has cell phones recording video.

There was a great paranormal movie about 5-10 years back that featured ectoplasm in a few scenes, I'm trying to remember the name. I'm sure it will come to me.

Ghost hunters have caught something similar to ectoplasm (supposedly) once or twice but it really looks more like small forms of light rather than white cloth or thick white smoke.

>>16934067
I believe you're thinking of a haunting in Connecticut