Consider the following.
>>16927660
can you even triforce?
▲
▲ ▲
>>16927745
hmm g r
▲
▲ ▲
>>16928473
You got any more tinfoil?
>>16928312
This is so arbitrary, you could use any sized objects to fill the image to get any kind of answer you wanted.
>>16928494
No.
>>16928495
Yes.
>>16928557
Feel free to prove star and hexagonal properties in aribtrary numbers then.
>>16928561
No.
>>16928569
That's all I needed to hear, thanks.
>>16928572
Yes.
it's right there
>>16928312
The number of hexagons that fit inside isn't set at 37 and only 37. Learn to math. SEE PIC
>>16929422
You have to use circles as the basic shape, so no.