Ancient Aliens Debunked
- Home
- Board: /x/ - Paranormal
- Reading: Ancient Aliens Debunked
Daily reminder that Ancient Aliens is bullshit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ
daily reminder its not
hubble.jpg
3rd to last pic is giant worm parasite 10,000 galaxies wide
2nd to last pic is jabba the hut
last pic is the moth-er-ship
sub microscopic yo
---- sub planets would be millions of years old never reset in the matrix [[[its probably the year 500,000+ on earth remember?]]]
>>16101984
Watch the video and show us where it's wrong then.
I never really bought the Ancient Aliens stuff, but I enjoyed watching the show to be introduced to cool shit I could research later, and to lol at some of the commentators.
I'm really enjoying the video though, OP. Thank you!
Guess the last tread 404'd, how did it go? Was /x/ accepting of alternate viewpoints?
>>16102044
Actually this is the first thread (but not the last) I've posted on /x/ :)
>>16102081
I posted ancient aliens debunked this morning and now its gone, but posts from days ago are still on here.
>>16101976
Of COURSE Ancient Aliens is for real! Look at their HOST!
>>16101976
>AAyy lmao debunked
Congrats, OP, your Christfag shill managed to point out the exaggerations and bullshit contained in the writings of Von Daniken, Sitchin, Tsoukalos, and their shills.
Is the idea of aliens potentially influencing ancient civilization altogether thrown out? Nope.
>>16104035
daily reminder its not
maybe the film is debunked, im not saying its accurate, but that doesnt make every story ever false.
the film was just a sugar coated "hey guys wake up" film, and was definitely not on par with a good docu
>>16104035
you are just the worse.
I mean really despicable.
just loathing in self despair and delusion.
>>16104044
>waaaaaah ur despigabull bcoz u dun agzebt absoloot zerdaindy wen i dibunk stuff
You and OP confirmed for faggots.
>>16101976
Phillip Coppens debunked the film (made by a Christian fundy), and now he's dead.
so glad this documentary was made. I was really getting tired of the humane race being discredited for their accomplishments.
Nothing and I mean absolutely nothing supports Ancient Aliens theory. Yeah, Ill give you the allure of good story telling. Unfortunately all of their "Theories" fall apart when reviewed by actual archeologist. You know archeologist rite? People that dedicate their lives to studying past civilizations. Vs. the ancient alien guys that dedicate their lives to their own fantasy and know nothing of past civilizations or ancient architecture and tools.
why are you getting your history from those guys again? They can't even see what is rite in front of them.
just saying.
>>16104058
I can feel your butt hurt and hear your autism.
>>16104065
>why are you getting your history from those guys again? They can't even see what is rite in front of them.
>just saying.
I'll take "what is a strawman" for $300
Jus' saiyan'
>so glad this documentary was made. I was really getting tired of the humane race being discredited for their accomplishments.
I think this reaction itself is exaggerated, even the AA promoters themselves used cherry-picked evidence to make their claims, i.e; Easter Island heads, Pyramids of Giza, Puma Punku, etc... to make their case, so to them they weren't undermining human accomplishments intentionally; merely trying to find an 'ayy lmao' explanation for what they considered gaps.
>taking Chris White's opinion on it this seriously
>>16104067
Sure, its your own anal emissions blowing back in your face. kek
>you projecting this hard
>loses anyway
>resorts to 'hurr hurr i was only pretending'
>>16104064
>(made by a Christian fundy)
/trashed
>>16104082
nah, I'm rather confident your a misguided individual that is probably due for a shower? am I rite? or am I rite?
>>16104086
>nah, I'm going to continue to project and try this hard to make a point
Entertaining, go on.
>>16104079
I think you just want aliens to exist in the past. So bad that you are filling a fact less vacuum with outlandish theories and ideas that have nothing tangible to support them.
>>16104092
>I respond to the thread
>responding means I am an AA supporter according to this retard
>clutching at straws, the post
Who are you responding to exactly? Someone you made up?
>>16104090
I will. since I seem to have you interest in my abilities to read you like an open book.
you vastly believe anything with no real value or fact. you dedicate your self to the fringe ideas because you struggle with the demands or reality.
This is probably brought on by lack of involvement by your parents growing up. I.E. letting you find out make believe people like Santa aren't real on your own. This destroyed your since child like wonder. You long to recover this fascination with the unknown.
Your desire how ever has out casted you from the general demands of real life. Why chase a real dream that requires effort when you can sit at a computer and chase a false dream. exerting as little energy as possible.
.
>>16104099
so you don't support AA? however you will defend their research and humor their findings? I need you to clear this up.
>>16104109
You have my interest in your abilities to read at all, period.
>you vastly believe anything with no real value or fact. you dedicate your self to the fringe ideas because you struggle with the demands or reality.
You project and create strawmen arguments to legitimize your position when someone finds flaw in your thread.
>This is probably brought on by lack of involvement by your parents growing up. I.E. letting you find out make believe people like Santa aren't real on your own. This destroyed your since child like wonder. You long to recover this fascination with the unknown.
Is this something you experience yourself, and why you project your own hurt feelings and damage past on to others because you believe they're making the same atrocious fallacies you are? lel
Who's book are you reading from exactly? A cursory check on the front cover seems to be your own past, but I understand you need to claim this of others to make yourself feel more secure. :)
>Why chase a real dream that requires effort when you can sit at a computer and chase a false dream. exerting as little energy as possible.
>he says
>while posting on the Afghani weaving bulletin board he is on
Entertaining indeed.
>>16101976
http://chriswhiteministries.com/
"We have traditionally focused our efforts on ministering to those in cults, or the occult / New Age movement. And although that still remains our focus, we are finding new opportunities all the time to minister to those who are lost and in need of the love of Christ."
> Don't believe in those new age ancient alien theories. My cosmic jew space god is a much more superior explanation for the existence of humanity and civilization.
Well pick your poison. I find AA to be more level-headed than Christian "explanations" involving immaculate conception and ex nihilo creation. Broken down, it is just a bunch of mortal people in space ships who happened to stop by ancient earth. Not a huge stretch of the imagination. It is also less dogmatic. One can accept scientific theories such as big bang, evolution and all that. In fact, recognizing that the universe is immensely vast and old makes AAT all the more plausible. Why wouldn't a civilization beat us to the punch in evolution and come here to kick start things? Unless you want to believe in a idealized Star Trek universe where other civilizations don't interfere, this is the natural conclusion. It also fits in with ancient writings that were later mangled and mutated into oppressive religions. Nobody has started a religion off of AAT yet. In fact Daniken has said that he hates the idea of someone making it into a religion.
>>16104121
If it isn't obvious by now that I don't even humor their findings as scientifically valid, then you may need to learn how to read a reply properly before responding.
Yet again, I'll reiterate, just because one group does a shit job making a case for aliens influencing our past, doesn't rule out with 100% certainty that it didn't happen. That is basic logic, and apparently it flew past your head.
>>16104129
/thread
>>16104124
actually, none of that is like my life. you would orgasm over 9000 times just living one hour of my life.
Wait no, you would probably collapse under the demand of it all. I do a lot of volunteer work when I'm not working. My average internet time a week is 6 hours. That includes my smart phone, tablet, and pc.
I guess the mystery of the world and life kind of fade when you actually spend time out in it.
Its easy to believe in anything when you just take peoples word for it and never, ever, ever and I cant say ever enough go out and question what they have been told.
just keep refreshing the internet though. Eventually someone will tell you how to live your life with out independent thought or desire to question things.
>>16104130
I just need you to tell me what evidence you believe that AA is a possibility. Because all of your replies are on the fence. indecisive people are pointless to argue with.
>>16104138
>you would orgasm
Ahh I see, now you're bringing up the 'argument from (supposedly) having a better existence'
Or the pious, holier than thou 'argument from voluntary work' fallacy. Meaning the anon here cannot be incorrect because his life is grand and he does volunteer work.
Seems like you're making a fantastic argument for converting to an Abrahamic faith, so when are you going to do it? lel
>Its easy to believe in anything when you just take peoples word for it and never, ever, ever and I cant say ever enough go out and question what they have been told.
Its easy to make fallacies-per-minute terribad replies and think it should be taken seriously, because you're above those 'forum-posting cretins' who you are intermingling with right now to make your imaginary existence feel better.
Is shit so cash for you, anon? top kek
>just keep refreshing the internet though. Eventually someone will tell you how to live your life with out independent thought or desire to question things.
>I know, I'll get him with that 'refresh button' comeback, while I-I'm clearly not doing that myself
>>16104144
>evidence you believe AA is a possibility
>implying
>Because all of your replies are on the fence. indecisive people are pointless to argue with.
>more assumptions
Apparently not ruling out something absolutely = being on the fence.
Yeah I think its safe to say you know diddly squat.
>>16104161
having a better existence than you is not a argument its a fact. I'm just telling how much I love my life. The people in it and the joy of being exhausted after burning up all your energy from a 12 hour day.
The other half, realizing how most of what people consider paranormal and supernatural are just a lack of real world experience is also a fact.
I cant physically drag you out of your deep butt shaped cushion. I can however tell you nothing you believe is real and that you will never question it because you have no self control. When it comes to a thing you are obsessed with and have giving into with no real debate with your self about whether or not you are being lied to or just lying to your self.
any of this sinking in yet?
>>16104169
im just trying to figure out your point. you want to believe something is possible yet not really have any interest in it?
because the three biggest sights used by AA for their message have always been understood by archeologist and geologist years before Chariots of the Gods came out.
They say aliens had to have done it. Yet we find constant evidence that contradicts the AA findings.
The movie while it may be funded by the evil Christian powers. Still has its head in tangible evidence that fits the theory.
The AA guys are literally lying about their biggest boast of proof of past visitation.
so unless you actually want to contribute evidence to either side then your just typing to hear your self type.
>>16104180
>its a fact
My sides... and he talking about 'refutations' in this thread, you don't even understand what logical arguments are.
>I-I love my life... d-don't tell me to kill myself for being retarded
Don't worry, I wont internet friend. :^)
>talking about the supernatural or paranormal is due to a lack of real world experience
So then why are you here then? Oh wait, sorry... I need to correct myself there, your ability to reason itself is paranormal to a point its incoherent and cannot be validated by modern science. You have me there.
>hurr durr I'm the magical fellow who can't save you from your 'delusions'
Yeah you couldn't, you can't save yourself it seems.
>Any of this sinking in yet?
Well in that case, I must sincerely apologize that I don't take the ramblings of someone who needs to legitimize his 'grand existence' on 4chan of all places... something that is actually making me chuckle hard.
>>16104200
>you're trying to figure it out
What is so hard about accepting that there are no absolute certainties in reality? We don't have evidence to rule out the possibility of alien contact or influence in our past to 100%, the AA debunked documentary simply refutes the stupidity of Daniken and friends, meh.
>The AA guys are literally lying about their biggest boast of proof of past visitation.
Hold the presses... you mean... they're doing this... for money? Golly gee.
>>16104201
he is*
>>16104201
chuckle or sobbing?
im betting its sobbing.
admitting you have a problem with adjusting to the responsibility of real life is hard. You wouldn't be the first person I have helped through their down fall from the fantasy land they isolated them selves in. You will cry a lot and curse all the people in your past that made you this way. That's okay though. The road is hard but short.
After you get past this the world will come to you in all new colors. You won't need fantasy to explain things anymore. You will actually be putting the effort into finding out your self. Instead of loathing for hours over nut jobs with blogs and a you tube channel. ;)
My ability to reason is only paranormal to you because you don't have real world experience. Once you start living in the world again you will see the wretched state all this paranormal stuff puts people in. Holding on to something so far out there that it can only be make believe. Time to get off the little red trolley and walk outside.
idk what you guys heard
but everything thats not this or shrektillian or rake is pure disinfo
odin said he would get rid of ice giants
youve probably seen this as AvP2 or in XFiles when theirs a huge ufo under the arctic ice
>>16104209
doing it for money. yeah figured that was clear to both of us. Do you hear how egotistical you are?
Continue not really taking ground on things though. I guess that works for you.
Flying spaghetti monsters, giant space babies. Cant rule them out completely so I guess I shouldn't subscribe to the they don't exist idea yet.
>>16104225
>chuckle or sobbing?
im betting its sobbing.
Hahahahahahaha...
My goodness... that actually made me laugh harder... well done, anon.
>inbound e-psychiatry and psycho-analysis
I don't think you'd be able to argue your way out of a paper bag.
>You won't need fantasy to explain things anymore. You will actually be putting the effort into finding out your self. Instead of loathing for hours over nut jobs with blogs and a you tube channel. ;)
Well hey... if you can't find it by fact, why not make it up? ;)
Always surprised to see that those 'bound by facts' or 'debunkings' are literally engaging in irrational arguments. I guess you earned that fedora meme after all.
>My ability to reason is only paranormal to you because you don't have real world experience.
I think your ability to reason is paranormal because you have a severe disconnect with reality that you're desperately fighting a losing battle; to my own entertainment.
By now statistics alone should have given you something to be right about, but you're still engaged in this colossal red herring to nowhere.
>>16104238
>muh egotism
You mean, aside from your initial shitposts that missed my point completely and tried to make assumptions without any backing, and you only more recently admitting that you actually don't grasp the point made at all?
>Continue not really taking ground on things though. I guess that works for you.
Excellent way to describe yourself, I agree.
>Flying spaghetti monsters, giant space babies. Cant rule them out completely so I guess I shouldn't subscribe to the they don't exist idea yet.
>cannot differentiate between fantasy and more reasonable claims, such as pre-existent aliens who could be more advanced and may have (possibility) contacted us
Even Dawkins concedes this possibility for pan-spermia, you fedora-wearing cuckold.
>>16104244
Tried for tonight anyway. I think I put a crack in that shell of yours though. It won't hit you now and maybe not for a couple of nights. Then one day you will be stating at a home page wondering why you keep reading the same recycled crap. Wondering if this constant pursuit is actually going any where. Then when you lay down to go to bed one night you will have a huge debate about yourself in your head. Where your going? What are you doing with your life?. You will say when I'm 60 will believing in all of this have actually meant anything?
The days tick buy and you know deep down inside that one day you will only have your self to rely on, and we both know you are not reliable.
Anyway. Off to the shelter. The truck arrives in an hour and there are only 2 people to unload the food donations today.
enjoy your fap before you go to sleep and when you wake up, and the for the rest of the day when your not scrolling endlessly living to the sound track of a keyboard and mouse click.
bye anon. Im pulling for you because I believe in you.
>>16104246
now you just sound irritated and asshole like.
you never got a point and failed to state that your "never knowing a 100%" concept only encompassed what you deem as reasonable.
So you think no evidence allows for something to be possible because we can't know for 100%. However if said thing is out of your opinion it must be ridicules and ridiculed for not knowing you are the defining decision on what counts and what doesn't.
Here we go with the endless circle philosophy argument.
>>16104268
>waaaaaah stop being a meanie
Stop shitposting and learn to read.
>you never got a point and failed to state that your "never knowing a 100%" concept only encompassed what you deem as reasonable.
It was in my first and second post in this thread, you dense fuck.
You and the other idiot (if you're not a samefag) came here with the assumption that simply because Daniken does a bad job at making a case for alien influence, therefore it can be ruled out altogether and I critiqued that.
Then again this is clearly a case of 'hurr skeptics' who think that just because they rejected the brainwashing Abrahamic cults, that now they can't in any way be illogical or incapable of missing the point.
>So you think no evidence allows for something to be possible because we can't know for 100%. However if said thing is out of your opinion it must be ridicules and ridiculed for not knowing you are the defining decision on what counts and what doesn't.
No, it can still be open to a possibility for a multitude of reasons of which I'm not going to go into length and spoonfeed you over, but point out yet again that Dawkins himself did in fact entertain it when he talked about pan-spermia, maybe if you take Bertrand Russel's celestial teapot out of your posterior for a moment you'd be able to think a bit more clearly on it... but I'm not going to hold my breath.
>muh endless philosphy argument
No, your endless inability to grasp nuance and to whine when others give you the same treatment you gave them.
>>16104258
>LE CONTINUED PROJECTIONS XDDD
Since your post was off-topic: TL;DR
>>16104258
>LE CONTINUED PROJECTIONS XDDD
>Tried for tonight anyway.
Tried? Apply yourself, anon. lel
Stopped reading there.
the docu was so bad anyway
i think it was disinfo
.
"oh look we found this one stone with a drawing, but its 1000 years old", not showing you the stuff in the smithsonian and the stuff even in AT&T is 100x more advanced
if u want real info go to a musem or the lourve
check out the old knights armor - and swords
fucking carvings of dragons on the handles and pictures of fucking space marine knights slaying dragons
this shit is christian media control
>>16104322
try art
demonic art sells for millions
why?
so the fucking monsters cant destroy it
"silent scream" continues, look how bad this thread is ;/ deniers of history mang
>>16104268
like
>>16101976
I like how op does not know english. Or is only pretending to be a retard.
No matter how you look at it, the literal definition of paranormal is something completely outside of what is normal. If Ancient aliens is bullshit, and you know that to be a fact you are willingly wasting your own time here.
Is that logical or smart?
>>16104332
shitposting
to some a cause
to some a job d;
>>16104332
dislike
>>16104332
They're on a conversion drive here for Fedoranity, where Epicurus is sacrificed on the cross of irrationality to save us from ourselves.
>>16104332
Every thing and anyone one here are both of those things.
This board needs to be shut down and used for something better. It really is the worst example of a paranormal community. It's just the same threads over and over again. The rest of the posts here exist on /b/ /mu/ and /tv/
Let's start a petition with other boards to do the rite thing. disban the low life forms that have started squatting and throwing there shit at anyone with skepticism here.
Let the mods know. /x/ has got to go.
>>16104354
>It's just the same threads over and over again.
agreed 100%
>Let the mods know. /x/ has got to go.
inmature... who do you think you are to propuse what you've just said?
>>16104354
>throwing there shit at anyone with skepticism here
If you read this thread properly, the skeptics began the shit-flinging, and increased their efforts when I simply pointed out that just because AA do a bad job, doesn't necessarily mean that its proof aliens couldn't have influenced our past somehow.
They are closed-minded themselves and trying to pretend that threads like these aren't bait, or that /x/ is just full of no-lifers simply because they have paranormal or supernatural experiences.
>>16104360
Someone that's tired of /x/ and knows it's a breeding sess pool for shit tier tin foils and spiritualist.
I have always known it needs to be destroyed. It's fate.
>>16104374
the board is everyones ppl makes it ppl destroys it
without everyone this wouldnt be posible..
be constructive n bring new ideas
>critics r words only
>>16104395
No, critics are also action. That's how change happens. When Someone or a group of people disagree with something they work to change it.
/x/ belongs to the 4chan community, it is not an island among itself. You and I also know that getting other boards behind making this board not the raging autistic playground it is. Would probably gain ground and reach its goal.
/x/ is well hated across all boards. Only respected for x tan and that's it.
>>16101976
What happens after I die?
>>16104769
You fall asleep and wake up as one of your cousins with only a hazy memory of your former life
Good film. It totally exposes ancient aliens in out right lies and willful ignorance of scientific facts. Why would the ancient aliens guys need to lie? Is it honorable to lie?
>>16104365
So you admit all of your posts are a huge strawman? No one said the video disproves that aliens influenced the past. The topic of the thread is Ancient Aliens is bullshit. The video debunks the arguments in the show, not the entire concept. So nothing you've said responds to the thread.
>>16105481
See >>16104035
>admittance
>huge strawman
>implying
Read the responses further down, because it was them who conflated a large amount of straw men and red herrings all for me simply saying "it doesn't rule out aliens possibly influencing our past" which is on-topic and fine to point out. From there they shitposted everything from 'muh life b grand yo, not like you /x/ fags' to 'u mus believe nonsense because I'm assuming so'
Then again you're probably a samefag in that reply list, so no surprises there.
Ancient Aliens: "These people did not possess the tools to cut these granite stones".
Fact: "The stones are sandstone and there are literally tools everywhere". LOL
>>16102125
Not enough brevari
>>16104065
"Rite" and "right" are different word with different meanings. You do understand english, right?
>>16105481
>stating simply that this doesn't rule out completely that aliens could have influenced our past is somehow a 'huge strawman' and not a reasonable reply in the context of the thread
>exaggerating this much
It was a simple statement, the rest is projection and shifting the blame.
>no one said the video disproves that aliens influenced our past
>...not the entire concept
Confirmed for retard or samefag:
>>16104092
>I think you just want aliens to exist in the past.
>>16104109
>you vastly believe anything with no real value or fact. you dedicate your self to the fringe ideas because you struggle with the demands or reality.
>>16104121
>so you don't support AA? however you will defend their research and humor their findings? I need you to clear this up.
>>16104144
>I just need you to tell me what evidence you believe that AA is a possibility.
Yeah, there is clearly nothing above that implicated me supporting AA, does it? Herp derp.
>So nothing you've said responds to the thread.
False. What I said in my first reply was on topic, the overwhelming majority of the replies were not and laden with fallacies.
What is facepalm-worthy is the fact in that same first reply, I already agreed AA was nonsense, but that was clearly missed. Damage control by these idiots, in short.
>>16104058
So much misery captured in one post
>>16104035
I think in some cases it's more that their ideas are condensed into snippits
Tsoukalos sounds a lot more reasonable in long format
>>16104129
>discounting anything done by a christian, not on the basis of its argumentation, but on the basis of its being done by a christian
/x/
>>16105818
This.
I found 99% of the video pretty solid. His personal beliefs about the flood, and humanity then descending form 8 people...well that's where his bias shows.
Overall though, I thought it was pretty solid work.
>>16105800
>pretending not to be a samefag
Anal annihilation; the reply.
>>16101976
The real paranormal thing is that most people think that ancient people were massively retarded, but clearly that is not the case.
>>16104353
>where Epicurus is sacrificed on the cross of irrationality to save us from ourselves.
Riiiiiight.
All of you people who believe in this Ancient Aliens shit are objectively wrong. I say that with the full authority of someone who has two fancypants degrees in [related subject matter]. All of you are wrong, and if you do not realise this, then you have either magnificent cognitive biases working for you or are simply dumb. Choose your team!
Fucking dumb fucks.
No single piece of "evidence" ever presented by the Ancient Aliens proponents has ever been, you know, evidence. No, you can't build solid castles on a base of no evidence whatsoever.
But it;s pointless talking to Ancient Aliens people. You show them the proofs they demand, but they don't see; you tell them the explanations they need, and they don't understand. You try, step by step, but they'll simply refuse any widening of their horizon. It's one of the best examples for the anti-intellectualism of the USA and the dumbing down of its citizens.
Fucking stupid fucks. You are dumb on a cellularly vile level if you seriously believe in Ancient Fucking Aliens and deserve to have your final resting place be pissed on daily by an incontinent gay goat with tapeworms.
Ancient Aliens.
Fickts eichana innasKnia earana hiangwixxtn Mongonuttnkinda
>>16105840
YES. The first American archeologists concluded that the Indians did not build Indians mounds and that they must have been built by the lost tribes of Israel. They wouldn't even give the Indians a few piles of dirt that lined up with the sunset.
