Hey anons, I want to have a "floating preview on hover"

Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
2016-03-25 04:12:02 Post No. 86793
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1375918842301.jpg (17 KB, 284x284) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-03-25 04:12:02 Post No. 86793 [Report]

Hey anons, I want to have a "floating preview on hover" like the site has, but on Windows.

I saw an anon that had this but I didn't get to ask him what program he used to do it.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-25 06:30:33 Post No.86838
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-03-25 06:30:33 Post No.86838 [Report]

File: settings.gif (117 KB, 461x723) Image search: [Google]

117 KB, 461x723

like this?

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-25 14:10:02 Post No.87002
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-25 14:10:02 Post No.87002 [Report]

>>86838
I'm talking about having a program or something that works the same way Image Hover does, but on Windows Explorer.

The anon I'm talking about uploaded a webm where he hovered over image files he had, and a little floating preview box popped up showing the image.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:06:13 Post No.87079
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:06:13 Post No.87079 [Report]

http://qttabbar.wikidot.com/

I googled "Windows Explorer Image Hover Preview" and found this.

Enjoy.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:07:41 Post No.87081
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:07:41 Post No.87081 [Report]

File: Selection_243.png (223 KB, 506x425) Image search: [Google]

223 KB, 506x425

>>87079
I'm assuming this is it.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:13:34 Post No.87086
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:13:34 Post No.87086 [Report]

>>87079
Thanks. Tried searching that in google but most results were forum questions.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:20:42 Post No.87092
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:20:42 Post No.87092 [Report]

>>87086
I actually found it inside of somebody answering a forum question.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:27:20 Post No.87098
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-25 17:27:20 Post No.87098 [Report]

>>87092
I see, thanks anon, and sorry, I'll look more thoroughly next time.