I can't find anything really high quality. Just found this (pic related) which looks like some upsampled crap with a watermark on it.

Thank you for trying mate:)

>>82424

No problem, still looking because I'm curious. It's a cool picture.

https://www.google.com/search?q=post+apocalyptic&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSjgEaiwELEKjU2AQaBAgACAMMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEiiKDOwW6xbCFZYE9xfDFbcMxBWUGbYtyCTkKLUtpjrCLfM5uS2sN8AtGjC2EzuehFCawfpCuHGZWSyVkIS7c2OkB_1m7rrsEbgDxuUDk1vRQhQh96sgWeCIldFkgAwwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBDjbMPcM&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio--Gn2MzLAhUFdD4KHXUXDKkQ2A4IGygB&biw=1920&bih=955#imgrc=_

If you can get that link to come up it's the image search results I got from google so far. I'm gettin closer to more results, the quality of these results might satisfy your definition of "better quality"

In my opinion it would be either this one (pic related)

if wallpapers of apocalyptic art with guys in gasmasks is your thing, check out Romantically Apocalyptic.

http://romanticallyapocalyptic.com/

>>82866
Here's a list of reasons why you should avoid this webcomic like the plague:

http://www.badwebcomicswiki.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Romantically_Apocalyptic

>>82878
>http://www.badwebcomicswiki.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Romantically_Apocalyptic


i see a bunch of opinions. i don't see any reasons. and OP was after apocalyptic artwork, not autistically-detail-accurate story lines.

could it be you're jealous because he's got Ariane St Amour as a model?

>>83345
>>82878
Yeah, I'm not buying that.

The whole thing would be a lot more compelling if the first 50% of it wasn't a whinge about how he doesn't make the art the way the author would prefer.

>>83345
> could it be you're jealous because he's got Ariane St Amour as a model?

I actually had no idea who this was so I googled it.

Jesus christ I wish I hadn't

>>83382
Oh fuck me and my curiosity.