Umji edition
>>814638
not even cute
>>814369
>>814913
>>815009
>>814638
i thought kpop was supposed to be cute, who is this goblin?
Did someone say Minah?
Amazing how people manage to have such shit taste, posting this ugly gook bitch. At least she is not as ugly as Hyeri but still
Amazing how people still come to /wsg/ to post shitty fucking youtube webms with no sound and below 3mb.
>>815262
nice webm with sound you posted ;^)
>>814638
>Umji edition
>Only one Umji webm
>Not following rule 2
>Not linking back to previous thread
>>815262
To be honest I've tried to look for sauces of for many of these webms, and those with no sound are okay because if there was sound it would be just audience chattering and camera sounds because they're taken so far away
>>815266
Has anyone found the sauce to this yet?
>>815883
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3pS-ov-ofo
>>815892
I meant the video but thanks anyway
>>815883
>>Has anyone found the sauce to this yet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZST7bvXjyIw
>>815266
was playing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2LSSgQMc2E
when opened this webm
>>815266
who the fuck edited this shit?
Reminder to ignore the le outsider talking bad about kpop/Korea, anon is probably from /mu/, like this one
>>815941
>>815959
Thanks man. Appreciate it.
>>816122
Shut the hell up. Why don't you remind yourself and stop putting shut on top of shit?
Nice dubs though.
>>815892
lol
Bini's split personality~
>>816238
wow such acting
>>816238
holy cringe
and wayyy too much minah in this thread
>>816238
That slut knew what she was wearing and didn't bring her own blanket.
>>816267
Don't be silly. There's never enough Minah.
post jiyeon
>>816306
don't call her a slut idiot
>>816342
Only a slut doesn't cover her legs while sitting.
>>816351
fuck off retard
>>815706
What webms do you need the source for? I might be able to help.
>>816117
a god.
Why are East Asian girls so perfect, bros?
>>815861
That's actually catchy.
>>816931
These creatures have 0 ass and 0 sensuality. I'm sorry, I have just turned into a racist. I am sorry.
>>816945
Don't worry, it's not racist, it's the truth
post some tahiti ari
please
stop spamming
>>815861
I'm starting to get pretty obsessed with Lim Kim, lads
and I don't even like k-pop
>>817287
based Josh
>>817045
> 2015 not posting the better dance version
>>817368
When will they stop doing meme shit?
>>817377
brainfuckt shit seems to pay better... sadly
:stopspam:
>>815065
Love how her eyes are slightly asymmetrical.
>>817603
needs sound for its full effect.
>>817603
I planned to make a webm of this, but never got around to it.
>>816930
I can't believe someone liked this enough to remake it with sound.
>>817933
That one girl have pink eye or something.
>>817966
she had some sort of eye infection, yeah.
![151107 dailytaeng9cam [ONLY 디지털 선공개] 일상의 탱구캠 16화 _ 최초공개! 태연의 방 그리고 개판 EP.3 (2).webm](https://i.imgur.com/Q0DHs4E.jpg "151107 dailytaeng9cam [ONLY 디지털 선공개] 일상의 탱구캠 16화 _ 최초공개! 태연의 방 그리고 개판 EP.3 (2).webm")
>>817900
More like annoyed enough when people post dancing webms with no sound on /wsg/
>>816924
super pooper trooper?
>>817037
Who do Koreans like hip hop culture so much?
>>818665
sourcE?
>>818685
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yCe2KRbz0k
>>818687
>>818678
>>818665
not kpop
there's a thread of sexy asians, why don't you go there?
>>818704
Ok, I will.
>>818281
hnggggggggggg
>>818704
>>818745
Are you gay, sons?
And technically they are either korean stars dacing to music or koreans dancing to kpop music
>>818824
They're neither. Again, there's a thread that I actually lurk dedicated to this, no need to put it here.
>>818829
Yes they are, even if it isn't your most popular SNSD or BigBang it doesn't mean it's not kpop.
>>818824
Holy shit so fucking fake.
>>818832
lol they aren't, not because she's Korean it automatically makes her kpop
>>818838
Another is a famous Korean DJ, does she have to be an idol before you can post it here without people starting to complain?
Another is dancing to a Korean pop song, how is that not kpop?
>>818844
>korean dj
>random afreeca girl dancing to music
>kpop related at all
>>818865
>kpop related at all
It is?
If not, tell me the strict definitions of allowed webms and what is kpop. Is some kpop idol taking a shit allowed but some "random" Korean playing and dancing to kpop not?
>>818872
idols doing things, performing, singing or in varieties, not really hard to comprehend
some Korean streaming on afreeca is not kpop
>>818886
Are you retarded, Koreans dancing to kpop is kpop related. By that logic this isn't kpop at all
Relax man, you post the kpop webms of idols shitting if you really want too see only those. For me anything with Korean celebrities or Korean music is fine
>>818903
Lmao no.
>>818903
you really wanna know what's kpop related? look at every single webm in here, except the afreeca ones, which are from random Koreans
Bambino is a dance kpop group, so it's related, do I have to explain everything for you? is this your first week here?
>>818907
>"koreans dancing to kpop is not ok!!"
>"except if it's Bambino, and dancing to western music, then it's ok"
Okay
>>818911
koreans dancing to kpop is not kpop related, those are some hoes wanting attention
Bambino doing a cover is kpop related since they're a kpop group, not hard to understand
Feels like you have no way out and you just keep replying, I'm not making the rules, that's just the way it is.
>>818914
>those are some hoes wanting attention
>>implying Bambino aren't just bunch of hoes wanting attention
Where is the line between non-kpop group and a kpop group? Is Waveya accepted or not mister rule-maker?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_QqLmINPlE
>I'm not making the rules
Then who is? Tell me where are the written rules of what should be in a kpop webm thread or not? I'd much rather enjoy watching "non-kpop groups" dancing to kpop than some arbitrary idols doing nothing.
>Feels like you have no way
It's not me that has a problem. I'm just posting kpop-related webms and you here started burgering about non-existent rules.
LIM KIM BEST GIRL
>>818922
Waveya is a cover dance group and dances to kpop, they're related. From the webms posted, only one has a kpop song, how are the rest related?
Feel free to ask if you have any more doubts.
>arbitrary idols doing nothing
then go to the sexy idols thread? why are you still here?
>>818937
Oh, so first it was only kpop dance groups, but now it can be only dance groups? What about 1-person dance groups? What is a difference between one person dancing to kpop and one person dancing to kpop? Or what about non-Korean dance groups dancing to kpop songs?
Seems like you have no good arguments against why Koreans dancing to music (Kpop or not) is kpop related. Except that "they aren't idols!", which would leave out things like Waveya or other cover groups.
>>818948
You can post Waveya, but why would you? you better look at idols.
Again, Koreans dancing to not kpop is not kpop related.
>>818954
>Koreans dancing to not kpop is not kpop related.
Except if it's Bambino?
>>818957
Bambino is a kpop group, they can do pole dancing and it's kpop related.
>>818962
Then why one person groups can't do pole dancing and be kpop related?
Based Seunghee hating that aegyo.
>>819044
she will never say this to me irl
;_;
>>819048
iktf bro
>>818963
>one person groups
>one person
>group
>>818922
>Tell me where are the written rules of what should be in a kpop webm thread or not
These rules are usually implicit when you look at a thread. It's like mixing "yfyl" posts into a "ylyl" thread. It wouldn't be on topic.
So, I made a short list:
Is the focus of the webm (and emphasis on focus) about
1) choreography from a kpop song
2) a member of a kpop group
Waveya fits under (1)
>>818832 falls in line with (2)
>>818903 is in category (2)
Meanwhile, the persons in the Afreeca DJ pots are neither assigned to an entertainment label nor is their dancing modeled after any choreography from a kpop song.
>>818922
>I'd much rather enjoy watching "non-kpop groups" dancing to kpop than some arbitrary idols doing nothing.
And that's why you'd do better going to a thread based off that.
>>819129
I lab you~
>>819130
Is Orange Caramel dead?
I can't live in a world with no Raina.
>>819514
last i heard pledis was going broke so no comebacks in the near future, goes for after school as well
>>819060
>It's like mixing "yfyl" posts into a "ylyl" thread.
No. You think it's ok to post idols doing arbitrary stuff but not Koreans dancing to kpop. It's like if you went in /lit/ to a "book discussion thread" but no one talks about the book but posts videos of what the author does in real life.
If you define "kpop thread" to only contain "kpop", which is the group of different Korean pop music, then all the webms should only be clips of music videos, live events, dance practices and covers or anything with the actual music in it. By that logic >>818824 is way more "kpop" than for example >>817984
So you made those rules just to fit your own idea of what is kpop related and what's not? Here's mine:
1) If the person/group is not in a Kpop group, he/she must dance/sing/play/do something related to kpop music/culture
2) If the person/group is in a Kpop group she can do whatever she likes (even though like I said I'd watch less these and more about the actual music)
I know, some of the AfreecaTV posts are borderline cases, but I still don't see the big difference between her and something like Waveya dancing to western music.
And those still leave open questions, like can there be webms of Waveya (not being a "assigned kpop group") doing random shit?
How closely has a foreign dance or sing to Kpop to be allowed?
Is Korean Variety shows or non-idol webms allowed?
Also why is single person without entertainment label dancing so different from single person with the label dancing?
>And that's why you'd do better going to a thread based off that.
Please, guide me to the "non-kpop groups and people dancing to kpop" thread. I don't care about qt asians or music threads. All the webms (even the couple afreekatv ones) I have are more or less related to kpop and that's why I'm here.
If you're really that strict and want everything to be separated into 10 different /wsg/ threads you can be the OP of the next thread and write the rules in the first post.
>>819609
>>815861
Taiwanese are such biters man.
>>818286
What... what is the context for this?
>>818287
Solji is so cute and there isn't enough love for her.
>>817053
they are from reddit
fuck them
>>817603
Please someone put JJBA's Star Platinum ORA sound
>>819609
There's a basket of reasons you can't compare books and kpop, the top ones being how they're presented and "celebrated"/"enjoyed" differently.
>Waveya dancing to western music
I only now realize that the post about Waveya had them dancing to a non-kpop song. In that case, it's in that grey area you described. I suppose its been glossed over because Waveya has done kpop dance covers in the past and it falls in line with kpop choreography enough that few mind. And for the record, Bambino actually is assigned to an entertainment label and has outputted at least one single.
The main issue that I take (not sure about the guy that responded to you earlier) is your first rule
>1) If the person/group is not in a Kpop group, he/she must dance/sing/play/do something related to kpop music/culture
which sounds glaringly ambiguous and casts too wide of a net over what's considered on-topic. A video of a guy singing along to a kpop song while driving to work fits under that definition but I doubt anyone would want to see it unless there's something notable about it. In your specific example of the video from afreeca, aside from the background music, there's nothing else pointing in the realm of kpop. The focus of the video is then just to watch a woman dance. You could swap out the background music with any other song and it'll still likely not look out of place. That's why it should be under a "qt asian" thread.
>I don't care about qt asians if it's not about qt asians or music. All the webms (even the couple afreekatv ones) I have are more or less related to kpop and that's why I'm here.
Well if all the ones you have are like the afreeca ones in this thread, then the qt threads really are what you're looking for.
>Please, guide me
What prevents you from using the catalog?
>>762512
>>809634
>>818718
>>820356
cuuuuuuuuteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
>>820356
>There's a basket of reasons you can't compare books and kpop
Of course the comparison isn't entirely accurate, but stands the same point. Is "kpop" only the music genre or the whole Korean culture around music and idols, and where is the line between them.
>I suppose its been glossed over because Waveya has done kpop dance covers in the past
Oh, so if the group has done kpop covers before it's okay?
>A video of a guy singing along to a kpop song while driving to work fits under that definition but I doubt anyone would want to see it
Of course no one would want the threads be full of useless webms like that, but I don't mind those kind of webms every now and then. I still think they're k-pop related, and that's what this thread is for.
For example webm related. A non-idol, non-korean just singing to a kpop song, but it's interesting because he's in Korea, he sings and plays well and the Koreans sing along and participate in the performance(which they usually don't do).
>Well if all the ones you have are like the afreeca ones in this thread, then the qt threads really are what you're looking for.
80% of the webms this thread are mine. I don't even have webms to post in qt threads if I ever went to one
>What prevents you from using the catalog?
I already saw those, but they're not "non-kpop groups and people dancing to kpop" threads like I asked. I would happily post into two different threads if there was one for "Kpop idols doing random shit" and "kpop music and korean culture" webms
>>814638
who is this ogre?
>>821794
you momma
>>821859
mom died 10 years ago but if we brought her body back up right now it would still look better than that thing
>>817592
I really like the one that the longer black haired guy does at 11 or smth.
What are their names? (although blondie is horrible, but he plays it off fine)
>>822037
Found them, "Noel" apparently (the group).
>>815036
WHO is this, she isnt cute but just downright fucking gorgeous
>>822353
bread minah
>>822353
Based Nari getting slower and slower
>>819446
there is no way that asians are part of the human race
>>821704
> Is "kpop" only the music genre or the whole Korean culture around music and idols
There's kpop as a genre and then there's kpop culture which isn't limited to Koreans because of its global popularity. This thread is meant to include both.
>Oh, so if the group has done kpop covers before it's okay?
Apparently so, considering how you're the sole person I've seen so far contesting it.
>I still think they're k-pop related
Related? Not measurably.
>and that's what this thread is for
I strongly disagree.
Which brings me to
>I would happily post into two different threads
So why not make one yourself?
>80% of the webms this thread are mine. I don't even have webms to post in qt threads if I ever went to one
If the afreeca webms are included in that 80% you spoke of, then you surely do.
>For example webm related
The focus is either on the guy's abilities to draw a crowd and/or how peculiar it is seeing a foreigner in a country containing a population of predominantly different ethnicity than his own.
Like the webcam dancing, there's nothing remarkably kpop about it. The impact would be the same if it were a different country and he's singing a song originating there. Merely having Korean people, music, or even culture in the webm doesn't make it kpop-oriented.
The bottom line that I'm trying to convey is that stuff you have in mind is simply off topic for a thread meant for kpop things and that you'd find better prospects in threads that more properly align with the themes in the webms.
>>816931
Source on this?
>>822779
>considering how you're the sole person I've seen so far contesting it.
I'm not contesting it, I think it should be fine to post all kinds of dance and music webms related to kpop. It's just some of you who have the problem and I wanted to understand the "rules" of when posting kpop dancing or music is allowed and when not. There is a gray area but I would allow couple of webms from there to be posted here rather than starting to bitch about them and making a new thread for them.
>Related? Not measurably.
But related still
>So why not make one yourself?
Because I'd much rather like /wsg/ to have couple big threads with lots of posters and content than 100 smaller threads with strict rules and only one poster.
>The focus is either on the guy's abilities to draw a crowd and/or how peculiar it is seeing a foreigner in a country containing a population of predominantly different ethnicity than his own.
The main focus is, but it also has kpop in it. You can't start to limit webms by their focuses. For example if someone sings and dances perfectly to a kpop song but has a ridiculous clothing, and someone makes a webm where the main focus is the outfit, should it be allowed?
>Like the webcam dancing, there's nothing remarkably kpop about it.
The ones with kpop music in them are kpop related. Even though random Koreans dancing to western songs might be little too off-topic, I still wouldn't mind seeing Waveya and other groups being posted here. Besides how famous or how close to being an idol a Korean has to be before she dancing to a western song is ok here?
>Merely having Korean people, music, or even culture in the webm doesn't make it kpop-oriented.
Not oriented, but often related. Just some random people or non-kpop music (is Trot counted as kpop or not?) or random Korean culture shouldn't be posted, but as long as they have something related to kpop I don't have problems with them.
>>822779
Also what you think I have in mind is wrong. I don't have tons of off-topic webms I want to post here just to make you angry. I have many "kpop" kpop webms, and couple more or less kpop-related ones here and there.
So rather than starting to think and check on every webm whether or not you should post it everyone could post kpop-related webms unless it goes completely off-topic. It's not like these threads are too fast or anything
>>822353
Nari from wa$$up
>>817080
I NEED the song. IT'S SO FUCKING CATCHY!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>823213
Love Battery.
I don't like random afreeca bj's, desu
Also they're usually really plastic and gross
but what do I know i'm just some dude on the internet
>>823264
I'm with you. I'd rather not see BJs and dance groups.
minahs got the cutest voice in the world, i wish i could wake up to it every morning.
>>823462
lucky she didnt poke her eye out
>>823465
i would rip my eye out and donate it to her
>>816945
Thought you were being an ass, but you're right.
youngji kiss kiss kiss
>>819516
Damn.
That's.......sad.
I remade this, I hope you don't mind.
>>824031
you will never hug and pick up a goddess gyul posing as a boy
>>824031
God she looks weird with that hair, almost didn't recognize but the voice gave it away
>>824031
Does he know she's a girl in this scene?
>>824345
Gyuri from KARA, I hate that hair though
Webm looks kinda bad, but I preserved the audio which is more important (dowmixed from 5.1 to Dolby ProLogic II)
Anyone know who this band is?
>>824592
that's jpop
>>824600
racist
Seriously what the fuck is this thread?
Why do people obsessed to other country/culture that is different from their own,
why don't they explore more about their country and be proud?
This is utterly shit
>>824665
>obsessed
nice projection m8
>>824665
Fat white woman detected.
>>824674
not with that grammar
>>824665
just stop posting your webms without audio and your non kpop webms and fuck off
>>824345
no
>>824592
It's Scandal. But I'm not sure if you are genuine or just wanted to be an epik prankster...
>>824513
Where do you get 5.1 footage?
>>823227
yeah https://youtu.be/LjiCFbb_LP0
Thanks anon
>>825091
Depends of the show, that one is almost always in 5.1 (AC3)
>>825410
In where? Youtube?
>>825491
No, in Korean public trackers. Or jpopsuki, if you have an account there.
>>825403
still cant get over that stgae fail
>>822803
>>822804
Walk down a street and accost the first person you see. Ask if you two are related to one another.
You can claim that you two probably are because it's likely through one match numerous criss-crossing of family lineages down the ages - but that isn't what people have in mind when they talk about relatives.
>You can't start to limit webms by their focuses.
Of course you can, why else are boards split into different threads?
>I'd much rather like /wsg/ to have couple big threads with lots of posters and content
And others much rather not. A whole mess of posts could very well be put to better view in other threads without forcing those uninterested to sift through them in the original one.
>than 100 smaller threads with strict rules
If themes vary widely enough that they may be divided into 100 different threads, then it must be a clusterfuck to confine them all to a few threads to begin with.
Rather, the more likely scenario is that you're overthinking the whole rules thing and purporting the idea that board culture is several times harsher than it really is. The primary point is for posts to be oriented towards a central topic.
It isn't very demanding to exercise proper judgment to determine where what belongs. If you happen to be wrong, then you'll be tipped off when you see people objecting, as they have earlier. You can answer for yourself the example you put forth; at least two persons have already put in effort in trying to explain the concept of being on topic to you.
And even if there are 100 contrasting threads in the catalog, there's a thread watcher feature that helps with tracking.
>and only one poster.
If no one else is posting to a thread, wouldn't the likely explanation be that no one else is interested in what that OP is offering? The alternative you suggest is for the poster to then push their undesirable posts onto a more frequented thread where the focus actually lies elsewhere - and that sounds quite selfish.
Sana...
>>825624
Tzuyu...
>>825518
what happened
![[EXID]Hani speaking english.webm](https://i.imgur.com/3RL0HHl.jpg "[EXID]Hani speaking english.webm")
sohyun.......
>>825721
>>825518
Heh.
Hey, mistakes happen.
They probably were in a hurry to get the show out and nobody noticed it (as with us, not everyone knows Korean grammar/spelling all that well, so it makes sense somebody missed a wrong English spelling).
But it's cute - just like Ham.
<3
>>825653
See 825924... ;3
>>825565
>Of course you can, why else are boards split into different threads?
Because they're split according to the themes they're related to, not the main focuses. Like I said there would be tons of disallowed webms even in this thread if they were divided by their main focuses. It's ok if it's kpop related.
>And others much rather not.
Really? There are already many small threads that die just because they have too strictly specified rules. But even if they have broad rules people are still retarded and make many almost identical threads (5 cute X threads, 10 you laugh threads and so on). For good example this thread, even if it's not dying I'd like to see more than 1 post a day, even if it wasn't 100% on-topic.
>A whole mess of posts
>forcing those uninterested to sift through them
We're not talking about a whole mess of posts. We're talking about couple webms that are on the gray area of what is kpop related and what not. And I don't think not clicking the webm open according to the thumbnail isn't that hard. No one forces you to open every single gif and webm in this thread.
>If themes vary widely enough that they may be divided into 100 different threads, then it must be a clusterfuck to confine them all to a few threads to begin with.
That's the point, they don't vary so widely, but you make it seem like they do. Something related to kpop doesn't belong in this thread because it has no idol in it? One person dancing to kpop is not allowed but two persons are? Rather than making a new thread just to fit those absurd and vague rules they could be posted to the place they relate mostly to: this thread.
>>825565
>>826183
>It isn't very demanding to exercise proper judgment to determine where what belongs. If you happen to be wrong, then you'll be tipped off when you see people objecting, as they have earlier.
I know, I'm not wrong but I'm not saying you're wrong either. There are no written rules and we have a different opinions of them. I'm just arguing about defending my point of view.
>If no one else is posting to a thread, wouldn't the likely explanation be that no one else is interested in what that OP is offering?
No. Not everyone on /wsg/ posts webms. I bet majority just lurks or post "moar" or "source" in threads.
Also for example people may not find "men groups playing animal sounds backwards on weird instruments" threads with maybe 2 different webms fitting into that caregory that interesting, but those same webms would fit well into "music thread" even though they were not 100% music.
>The alternative you suggest is for the poster to then push their undesirable posts onto a more frequented thread where the focus actually lies elsewhere - and that sounds quite selfish.
I think exactly the opposite. If I made a thread with no clear rules and someone posted a webm with the main focus in something else than the thread's theme, I wouldn't start to bitch him about it but rather have the webm in that thread than force him to make a new a one just for it.
posting this for benefit glorious thread of /kpg/
>>826183
>There are already many small threads that die just because they have too strictly specified rules.
That's supposed to happen. The OPs know what they're getting into. You don't set out to make a thread just to bask in its popularity, you do so to see if others share the same interests.
>people are still retarded
Feel free to chastise them on their threads.
>I'd like to see more than 1 post a day
This board averages well over a single post a day. You can thank reposters for that.
>I don't think not clicking the webm open according to the thumbnail isn't that hard
I'm envious of your ability to magically ascertain the entirety of a file's contents from just the thumbnail.
>No one forces you to open every single gif and webm in this thread.
"Oh, hey, thread I regularly follow got a bunch of new posts since my last visit. Hm. Nah, I'll just skip them."
Does this sound realistic to you?
This has digressed quite a bit from where things began, so let me bring it back.
>We're not talking about a whole mess of posts.
Let's consider this thread.
>>816962
>>818517
>>818522
>>818523
>>818525
>>818665
>>818687
>>818678
>>818824
Do you consider a count of nine to be a mess of posts?
>>818824
>And technically they are either korean stars dacing to music or koreans dancing to kpop music
>>826183
>Something related to kpop doesn't belong in this thread because it has no idol in it? One person dancing to kpop is not allowed but two persons are?
See >>819060 and >>825565 (and even the related webm in >>820356)
>I wouldn't start to bitch him about it but rather have the webm in that thread than force him to make a new a one just for it.
>gray area of what is kpop related and what not
If you still can't understand the concept of "using proper judgment" and consequently why the collection of posts I linked above belong to the "hot asian women" threads instead of a kpop thread by now, then I have no more words to say.
That's it for me.
>>826664
>That's supposed to happen
I don't think so. I understand that OPs want to post and find other specifically themed webms, but 4chan isn't any kind of archive where the posts stay forever, but now if a thread dies everything gets deleted. If that wasn't the case then inactive threads with strict rules would be ok.
That's why I think it's more important to have alive threads with loose rules. If you want some specific webms or posts go to Reddit, there you can find years old webms and videos on subreddits.
>I'm envious of your ability to magically ascertain the entirety of a file's contents from just the thumbnail.
It's not that hard.
1. The AfreecaTV ones have been around for ages and you should recognize them
2. You can in 99% of the cases recognize some idol or filename or variety show hud.
3. Again no one forces you to open those. I might say I don't like watching Idols I don't know doing something pointless. What would I do? I'd close the webm and move to the next.
4. If those not-100%-kpop-focused webms really make you that angry, just don't open any webm without recognizable thumbnail and filename. Problem solved, everyone's happy.
>>Let's consider this thread.
>nine webms of which two are deleted and one is clearly kpop related
Yes, I consider 7 not to be whole mess in a thread with 115 webms. Besides the AfreecaTV ones are right after each other, I find it really hard to believe you'd get stuck opening each one if you want to avoid them.
>See >>819060 and >>825565 (and even the related webm in >>820356)
I already saw and replied those. What's the problem you have again?
>why the collection of posts I linked above belong to the "hot asian women" threads
I understand why they'd belong there, but tell me again why wouldn't they be posted here too. How many times I have to ask this, I know they are on the grey area, but what is a difference between the AfreecaTV webms and something like Waveya or an idol dancing to western music?
I feel there's one anon posting crappy webms with no audio just to bump the thread, even when it's not needed. Please don't, and no afreecatv webms.
>>828009
ace of engels?
>>828028
ja
>>816924
song?
>>818611
Cause they don't know how black people really are
>>817092
her english sounds good
>>828171
Google the lyrics
>>828138
Dude what.
