there are people out there that haven't webm-ified all their gifs for general

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 4

Anonymous
2016-05-30 21:57:59Post No. 1107312
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: haters.webm (918KB, 300x226px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-05-30 21:57:59 Post No. 1107312 [Report]

>there are people out there that haven't webm-ified all their gifs for general use
why must they keep us in the Stone Age?

Also, general reaction webm thread.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-30 21:59:34 Post No.1107316
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-05-30 21:59:34 Post No.1107316 [Report]

File: shock.webm (110KB, 498x350px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

110KB, 498x350px

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-30 22:00:47 Post No.1107319
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-05-30 22:00:47 Post No.1107319 [Report]

File: gif.webm (688KB, 332x592px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

688KB, 332x592px

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-02 20:46:54 Post No.1112439
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-02 20:46:54 Post No.1112439 [Report]

>>1107319
when engine was build for consoles too

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-02 20:56:18 Post No.1112453
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-02 20:56:18 Post No.1112453 [Report]

>>1107312
because some gifs have better utility in loop than a 3-5 second webm that doesn't always loop perfectly

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-03 01:10:47 Post No.1112770
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-06-03 01:10:47 Post No.1112770 [Report]

File: n.webm (663KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

663KB, 1280x720px