Definitely bumping this
This is apparently Frida Gustavvson but I don't see anything alike
>>6576401
I have one of her nudes
>>6576390
Sorry for the shitty quality
>>6576383
Op's girl is the only regular-looking, the rest are just gorgeous.
I hope my boner can recover from this thread but it's not looking good
desu senpai
>>6576528
>boner from a qt grill thread
how can you ever venture outside your cave without wearing triple pants to hide you raging boner?
>>6576722
By wearing triple pants to hide his boner.
>>6576402
Sharing is caring
Jesus i think regular but cute girls are my 10/10s. I could never put it into words but this whole girl next door shit really does it for me.
>>6577113
fuck, no wg srry my mistake
>>6576383
>Regular-looking
have you been outside?
the fuck is going on
>>6576391
>Reading Mein Kampf
>>6576404
>NLDE and HLDE Differential equations on the board
>not bad, but i bet its staged.
>>6577058
Here you go
dub dubs
>>6576383
>Regular-looking women
>all being at least 8/10
>>6577501
You think this is 8/10, anon?
>>6577501
>>Regular-looking women
>>all being at least 8/10
maybe in America, in Yourope all of these would be considered average.
regular looking ? WHAT THE SHIT
i wanna know where y'all come from if these are just "regularly looking"
I am now depressed.
Also, contributing.
phone
>>6577928
not cute srry
>>6578149
fucking mother of kek, what a shutdown
>>6577889
we all are, anon, just enjoy and pull through
>>6577799
that's a sick trip & dub combo
>>6577420
tnq anon
hope you recived more than just a pic ;)
cheers
Mine
>>6576399
she is beautiful.
also check'd
>>6581695
OP said regular not average.
>>6581695
I don't know where you're living, but in most places the average woman is a 6/10, unless you have super high standards or something.
>>6581695
I interpreted the request as, "Attractive in a casual rather than done-up way"
b-b-b-bump
>>6577420
that nasty ass areola
>regular looking
lmao these are like all models
>>6584242
this one ain't
>>6584340
still meh
ty for trying though
>>6584347
all good anon
>regular looking girls
>thread is literally almost nothing but professional models
lmao
>>6584521
Because models can't be regular looking...?
>>6587034
right, so dont post models
Gonna post some non-WP size cute grills to keep thread alive.
>>6587196
>>6587197
>>6587202
>>6587211
Only got 3 of them since im not a creep faggots like all of you little shits
>>6587211
That's not a girl, anon...
>>6581815
best picture so far
intense
>>6577420
ugly nips
>>6587841
i know, but nude
>>6587811
holy shit obama needs to take this down
>>6581695
The same reason women on dating sites "can't find a good guy."
>>6584521
>>6584347
>>6584242
I smell Reddit
Kek, there's like 6 regular looking girls in the entire thread at best
regular grill
Posting some cuties. They're as regular as most ITT
>>6590511
>>6590512
>>6590513
>>6581972
>the average woman is a 6/10
fucking what? the average must by definition be 5/10, because how else would you define the numbers?
You can't tie each score to an objective level of attractiveness, that'd be stupid. You aren't measuring the presence of something that can be quantified on a scale, you're rating something along a relative scale. For the average to be 6/10, everyone below average would need to be divided into five categories, while everyone above average are only in 4. This makes no sense because they should be about the same size, i.e there is the same number of above and below average people.
>regular
>but cute
what did he mean by this
what is an "irregular woman"?
are "regular women" typically ugly?
is this similar to elevating "real women" over who are apparently "fake women"?
I'm confused
>>6581972
>the average woman is a 6/10
fucking what? the average must by definition be 5/10, because how else would you define the numbers?
You can't tie each score to an objective level of attractiveness, that'd be stupid. You aren't measuring the presence of something that can be quantified on a scale, you're rating something along a relative scale. For the average to be 6/10, everyone below average would need to be divided into five categories, while everyone above average are only in 4. This makes no sense because they should be about the same size, i.e there is the same number of above and below average people.
>>6591390
At first I thought it would be a thread for "average" looking girls
But in the end the thread is full of incredibly good looking girls, some of them are even pro models. I guess OP wants "not ultra hot but still 7+/10 girls"
>>6591390
I think by "regular", OP means genuine. Not slaughtered by excessive makeup or surgery or other artificial things.
>>6576395
>Regular
>Most beautiful qt I´ve ever laid eyes on
Ok anon
>>6581815
She's cute. Looks a little like my wife.
On a lark (to keep my skills sharp) I smoothed out the skin on her face a touch. Left the nice features. Also tweaked the color.
>>6591387
>>6591390
>>6591697
>>the average woman is a 6/10
>>fucking what? the average must by definition be 5/10, because how else would you define the numbers?
Besides being a pompous douche bag, you're also about 7th grade in your math, social, and life skills.
* You're thinking of "median", not "average" (mean).
* The average can be literally *any* value between the low and high, inclusive. For example, If 5% of women are 1s, 5% are 2s, ... 5% are 9s, and the remaining 55% are 10s, then the average is 7.75/10. Or if all women are 1 out of a hypothetical 10, then the average is 1/10.
* The statement 6/10 is *clearly* an "intuitive assessment" and indicates that OP believes there is not a "normal" distribution of beauty among women and tends to find most women somewhat above *median* attractiveness.
>> what did he mean by this
>> what is an "irregular woman"?
>> are "regular women" typically ugly?
* Regular is clearly not in contrast to "irregular". Besides the narrow definition of "even" or "symmetrical", another reasonable definition is "normal", as opposed to "exceptional."
* The 10/10 sort that you see oversampled among models and such would be considered "exceptionally" beautiful, rather than "regularly" (or "normally") beautiful.
>> is this similar to elevating "real women" over who are apparently "fake women"?
No, this is appreciating a particular kind of beauty. It has a common name, "the girl next door" with a clear, commonly understood meaning in culture.
>> I'm confused
Maybe, but not about this. Your idiotic affectation matches the banality of your wit in the post.
I only even bothered responding because you're being cancer here and it's distasteful.
>>6590419
Ye lad. I'll tell her you said hi.
ITT: 8/10's and up who are dressed down/no makeup. Also lol at the fags here who try to contribute it to European "average girl" standards being higher than American standards. "Regular girl" yet probably still out of their league.
You faggots are a bunch of crybabies. Enjoy the content and shut the fuck up.
>>6592007
fucking thank you, anon
>all this discussion
Why is it even allowed to post image-less posts on a non-discussion board anyway? Just fucking stop it, newfags.
>>6591437
>"Not slaughtered by excessive makeup or surgery or other artificial things"
>90% of this whole thread is about girls slaughtered by excessive makeup and shit like this
As someone said earlier there are like 7 "natural looking" cute girls in this entire thread. The other ones either are pro models or 9/10.
>>6591738
it's worse
most of the woman in this thread aren't regular enough
>>6592019
E L I Z A
who would have thought I'd find you here
>>6592866
do you know any story behind her? apparently shes got nudes too?
>>6592951
yeah I was in a little skype group with her and some others
I haven't been back to it in a while so I don't really know what happened
I think there likely are nudes around but not very widespread, I don't have any sorry.
>>6593014
Thanks for the info, apparently she gave them to some fat black dude.
>>6577586
LIAR, ive been, most girls everywhere are gross.
7/10 is a standard to live by
>>6592064
That's just some personal rule of yours, not a board rule. Only board rule #5 applies:
>>5) Share anything WP related!
>>~ ~ (NO low res/quality, illegal content;
>>~ ~ ~ anime goes in /W/, this is not /r/)
The discussions are related to the papes.
>>6591754
Not him but
>* You're thinking of "median", not "average" (mean).
He's not. Besides mediane is not 5/10, look into your own example.
And it's more intuitive to say that woman rating system (kek) is gaussian distribution (in real life, not considering your particular artificial example), so the average is 5.
Not only are these girls not "regular", a lot of these pics aren't even wallpapers.
gf
>>6594754
Not a wallpaper
>>6577094
i feel you bro, i think the same about just next door girl.
>>6577586
i call this BS, i been in europe, indeed there are lots of nice girls but saying this are average is too much.
>>6594754
post n00dz or not real
>>6576391
I really dig this kind of outfit. Anyone know how to describe this style?
Slut
>>6597840
Yeah
European before degeneracy
>>6587196
Mr Beans daughter?
>>6598089
>mfw Swiss gf dresses like this
>>6599976
jealous of you, anon. take care of her.
>>6599999
>>6600000
>>6577420
no thank you, you can take those tits back to hell
>>6588121
When it's only half a face, only one boob with an ugly-ass areola, and an alright stomach, you end up with not much of a 'nude' and more of a fucked up picture.
>>6601291
>>6601293
>implying we give a shit
>>6581695
Roastie detected
>>6576383
this is my fetish
>>6577252
she's not reading, she's posing with books
>>6581695
>there is only one way to interpret the OP's request and you are ALL idiots for not seeing it
>>6603620
holy hell what a gorgeous woman
unreal
>>6605409
that is exactly the joke
>>6605409
N-no go greaso
>>6593055
jfc who is this
reminds me of someone
>>6605409
is this the girl who got another picture with her cat and painted whiskers on her cheeks?
>>6605987
Eliza, R9K, the one addicted to heroin or some shit
>>6605995
here's something better
>>6605988
ffffffuck
>>6605995
>>6605988
>>6605987
>>6605933
>>6605409
>>6606061
Don't worry :-)
>>6581695
>Stop saying average people are not as ugly as me!
That's how we know you're a degenerate and bitter feminist that will never get laid, Ms. Supreme Gentlewoman.
>>6606064
Very much doubt this. She loved the attention, that's what she wanted. No doubt this was a ruse from her or one of her orbiters.
They were often brainstorming ideas for threads and shit.
>>6606084
Just search up Soul Evans on YouTube as a channel. Badabing badaboom
>>6578262
goals
