Has anyone on /vr/ had any luck before installing/running Win95 on Dosbox to play early Windows games?
>>3346083
that sounds terrifying
>>3346083
Yes. It's awful.
Install virtualbox and install a 32bit version of XP.
>>3346098
Alright, thanks. Guess I won't waste my time on it.
>>3346083
Try pcem - http://pcem-emulator.co.uk/ - I'm currently playing nfs 2 using 3dfx, performance is pretty low in 10.1 ver (11 is latest), but still playable. Compatibility is outstanding, just select proper mobo and graphics card. You can find all drivers on vogons.
>>3346083
I did, using this guide: http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=24936
>>3346083
I did. Before I realized it was retarded and started playing on a free machine that just works.
Early windows games = Win 3.1
That's actually easy to install in dosbox.
Wasn't able to run games.
You basically have to create a separate disk image that spoofs a FAT32 file system.
>>3346534
This here. PCem was the only emulator I've found that will run Ultimate Domain(Genesia). Dosbox never ran it without crashing, but PCem runs it fine. Of course, you need to install DOS and drivers and everything else manually. You probably will be able to install 95, but I have no idea how well it would work.
it's crazy how dosbox was so promising for so long then just fuckin' dropped the fuck off
What's the matter? it is pretty straightforward.
>>3346083
Isn't that why DOSBox-X exists?
>>3347165
Windows 95 or 98 are fully supported, but only early games will work at full speed on high details. Later titles need some tweaking, you can't just put high and play. Apart form that, all my games work, I've recently lost my real machine and I'm not planning to rebuild new one, so I hope pcem will move forward.
