thanks BlackBerry, now i have a uncensored Wario Land 2 in english.
Description:
In the original Japanese version of the game, the penguin enemy held beer rather than a black orb. This was censored in the international release, which also made Wario’s reaction to the attack seem out of place. This hack un-censors the penguin enemy graphics to stay true to the developers’ original vision.
>>3105032
I never got this.
Do they think the imagery of beer is morally offensive or maybe that kids will automatically grow up as compulsive drunks only by being exposed to it? Do they honestly believe kids don't ever see beer on the television or even in real life?
>>3105032
Who gives a shit?
![CURVE-9350-9360-9370_0[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/0YCXXGG.png "CURVE-9350-9360-9370_0[1].png")
>>3105032
bravo canada, I guess
>>3105078
yeah it is a little weird seeing how everything about wario's personality is way more morally reprehensible than being a drunk. noa was probably just playing it safe or maybe just thought that kids wouldn't get it
>>3105078
Pretty much. Americans are dumb and they think that any media you consume will define your personality especially if you're an impressionable child (because of course all video games are for children). Nintendo just plays it safe because it's easier than dealing with annoying soccer moms (and nowadays it's sjws causing all the problems, so nothing really has changed).
>>3105215
its fucking wario man. he like beer
>>3105240
muh essjay boogieman is just certain people asking that certain elements in games have more neutral representation and not only pander to straight men. muh essjay boogieman is just the free market. it's really not the same as "think of the children"-type talk
>>3105251
well he clearly can't handle it
>>3105254
I'm not here to argue the legitimacy of the sjw movement, but anyone making attempts at censoring media because it offends their sensibilities is a moron imo.
>>3105259
it's not censorship. shutting them up to maintain gaming trope norms is though
>>3105251
what do people drink in mushroom land?
>>3105254
>>3105265
Seems you got lost on your way to tumblr. Please take your all-lowercase posts and triggered ass back there feminazi.
Why not just play the Japanese version
>>3105254
Kill yourself
>>3105259
>Because it offends people
Not a SJW but if depicts violence, rape, or extremely violent rape you don't think it should be censored, or at least restricted?
That said and to prevent "fuck off to tumblr" I wanna go on record saying I think it was retarded when people got upset that Hotline Miami 2 implied rape (didn't even show it and was meant to be a commentary on how the media sensationalises news).
>>3106274
Not him, but no it shouldn't be. If it isn't real and if it isn't hurting anyone then it should be allowed.
>>3105078
It's hilarious how the double standards on this are.
Beer ads on TV, Beer consumption is normal at american family restaurants
Consumption of beer absolutely forbidden in media not aimed specifically at adults. Hell, the existence of beer is forbidden.
>>3105254
If these people want these types of games, they should make them themselves and prove that they are profitable and actually bring in new gamers. That would better encourage companies to change their output as opposed to angry people (who may or may not have any intention of buying the product regardless of content changes) ranting online.
>>3106274
>>3106315
Never called the guy I commented wrong, just inquired if there should be limits.
Sorry I clearlytriggeredyou, you cumguzzling penis blackhole.
>>3106274
We have a rating system to judge the content of the game fairly. Let that give people an idea of what's in the game. It's not my fault that parents won't do their jobs if they're going to buy little Timmy GTAVI or whatever the hell. Censorship is literally one of the worst things you can do.
>>3106614
I guess, I just feel there some extremes where nobody really benefits from exposure. Such as when leddit had a "ask a rapist" thread that when I psychologist found said had more than likely given rapists a feeling of pride and satisfaction and possibly even made potential rapists more inclined to commit the act by reading others posts. I'm not saying depicting rape is inherently wrong but I do think enabling it is. But I suppose this is a pointless argument on 4chan where ugly losers that have no chance of getting laid think rape is their only chance. Yeah yeah ad hominem or whatever and yet I already know someone is going to be buttblasted I implied rape (regardless of genders) is somehow wrong.
>>3105240
>(and nowadays it's sjws causing all the problems, so nothing really has changed).
That's even worse. Fucking baby boomers getting freaked out by technology is one thing, but these idiots are literally a generation below us.
>>3105240
>Americans are dumb
Yes, America is the only country known for stupid censorship.
>>3105032
Censorship back in the 4th gen was always fucking nuts.
Nintendo of America censored all religious imagery or anything that could even remotely hint at infringing a copyright. They were even scared of the American Red Cross and took any red plus signs out of Earthbound.
Sega's Videogame Rating Council on the other hand only had five games with their maximum MA-17 rating: Mortal Kombat, Mortal Kombat II, Lethal Enforcers, Who Shot Johnny Rock?, and Rise of the Dragon.
Know what they all have in common? Every one of them involved live action recordings.
My guess is the VRC thought that the root of corrupting children relied on bad actors pretending to shoot each other, rather than the extremely phallic pixel art in Wings of Wor or the extreme violence in the Splatterhouse series.
>>3106303
people can express how they feel about games, it's the dev's prerogative to pander to those feelings. pretending it's censorship is persecution-complex, gamergate nonsense
>>3106112
he says, very obviously triggered and upset that /vr/ isn't enough like his gamergate containment chan
>>3107418
Germany lost their balls after WW2, they're among the few countries worse than you guys
>>3107353
>being a literal redditor
>durrrr if you don't want certain imagery and subject matters to be banned in media, you're a literal rapist shitlord
>depicting something (murder, rape, theft, etc.) even if it's shown to be horrible is "enabling it"
>some rapist talking about his experience and recommending it/making it seem interesting to idiots is the same as it being shown represented in fiction without being endorsed
>YEAH, well my social studies professor said THIS
2/10 made me reply. If you think about it, there are a lot of things that you don't directly "benefit" on a social level, that's not the purpose of entertainment/art. You don't benefit from people building theories about how the world will end on 12/21/2012, doesn't mean that should be banned either. You don't have to encourage people to put trashy or upsetting content in their games, but finding excuses to censor it more and more never leads to a good outcome.
>>3107418
To be fair robots made slightly more sense.
>>3107437
>>3107441
No seriously, go push your agenda somewhere else.
>>3107568
>muh /v/ hugbox
no agenda here mate, just facts.
>b-but they're not gamergate-approved facts
>>3105254
>certain elements in games have more neutral representation
AKA Warriors of Social Justice demanding Social "Justice" even in fictional games. Every demand for censorship comes down to making something more "neutral" (more neutral about religion, neutral about sex, neutral about violence, neutral about politics, neutral about depictions of alcohol, etc.).
>not only pander to straight men
Thankfully there are plenty of games that don't exclusively do that. You seem upset that developers make what they want, or things that players want though.
>essjay boogieman is just the free market
No it's not. It's people mad that the free market doesn't work in their favor, so they use whining, nagging, smear campaigns, propaganda, favoritism, and sometimes threats and legislation to change that.
>not the same as "think of the children"-type talk
Yeah actually it's worse. At least the "think of the children" people are legitimately worried that games will corrupt their children since kids are easily malleable and influencable, and they shouldn't be exposed to adult material. Meanwhile if we're supposed to believe what you say, SJWs only want more "neutral" content so less people are offended by them and will therefore spend more money on commercial products.
But the truth as they're most alike, they just think things make people sexist/racist instead of "corrupting children". At least the "think of the children" people don't force their shit everywhere and try to change entire cultures with their bullshit.
>it's not censorship
If content gets censored, it is censorship. The OP is a good example of it, the reason behind it doesn't change what it is.
>shutting them up to maintain gaming trope norms is though
>asking content to be removed isn't wanting censorship, but asking people to stop demanding content to be removed is
Great mental gymnastics.
>>3107764
>containment chan
>/v/
>gamergate
Do you have any other scapegoat? You seem more familiar with those things than anyone.
>>3105078
>>3105240
>>3106291
this thread reeks of autism. you realize kids don't behave the same way as adults, right? they're extremely impressionable and prone to imitating things they see. even if just one kid drinks his parents beer and gets sick and says he got the idea from wario, nintendo has a lawsuit and a PR nightmare on their hands. it's about covering their own ass.
it's the same reason they would take all religious imagery out of their games in the US. no sane person would give two shits about seeing a cross or a church in a nintendo game, but religious groups have always had a lot of money and power in america so it's a smarter business move to just completely disengage from them
>>3107806
A lot of companies don't do that though. Nintendo takes it another level.
>>3107770
>somehow whining about ~Censorship~ (tr: perspectives i don't like) in muh vidya isn't a first world problem but suggesting greater inclusion in that media somehow is
>more neutral about religion, neutral about sex, neutral about violence, neutral about politics, neutral about depictions of alcohol
what? by neutral representation i mean content that doesn't demean or objectify other perspectives and people. the indifferent or straight malicious attitude some devs have in game creation and players in gamer attitude only furthers the alienation that minorities feel and enforces white/male dominator culture
>Thankfully there are plenty of games that don't exclusively do that.
i'm not seeing much of it. typical that you don't understand these alternative perspectives to begin with. things might seem fine to you, but they're not
>>3107779
even if you're somehow unfamiliar with gamergate (i really doubt it.) you're giving me practically the same spiel anyway. i'm just saying where else you can go if you want your circlejerk
>>3107829
that's right. i'm saying it's a business decision and not some sort of moral judgement.
>>3107836
>content that doesn't demean or objectify other perspectives and people.
Where did this god-awful safe space bullshit even come from? Free speech doesn't somehow entitle you to not have your feelings hurt by things you don't like.
Personally, I'm not really into gay porn. I'm not campaigning to have it banned, or to put more women into gay porn to make it appeal more to me, I just fucking ignore it. If I was going to make some porn, it probably wouldn't be of the gay variety. And so the world keeps on fucking turning.
Perspectives and even people sometimes deserve ridicule. You're entitled to have an opinion, you're not entitled to force me to respect it.
>>3107836
>even if you're somehow unfamiliar with gamergate
All I know is that it pisses off SJWs like you because every time I read posts like yours they always mention it.
>i'm just saying where else you can go if you want your circlejerk
I did the same thing by redirecting you to tumblr, it's an honest suggestion. You faggots weren't here 2 years ago. If you're gonna get mad and start a discussion every time someone says something about censorship or PC cops, you probably shouldn't be here.
>>3107551
Wow this argument is more pointless than usual, because you are well as truly mentally handicapped. Do you actually think just because I mentioned reddit means I'm an active user? Hey let me trigger you some more: 9gag, funnyjunk, ebaumsworld, bodybuilding forums, knowyourmeme, newgrounds, Facebook, Google. Have you had a stroke yet? Or Did you realiaae people can be aware of stuff that happens on other websites?
He thinks we should censor all rape! Reeeeeeeeee! Ignoring my exact quote "There's nothing wrong with depicting it as long as you're not enabling it" confirmed for so stupid reading big words must be too challenging. Also I never draw the connection from talking to rapists and meaning censorship is necessary for fictional media. I was just trying to see if there are any extremes where it is best material is not
readily available to everyone. Oh no did a psychology professor, someone much, much, MUCH smarter than you, say something you disagree with? I guess that just means he's stupid, you know so much more from browsing one garbage website for 20 years.
Are you paranoid or something? Are you worried you'll lose you rape porn because then you won't have to wank to, because your so pathetic in real life just the thought of you having power over someone makes you cream your MLP underwear? If you'd do against censorship, then get off the ANONYMOUS image board and post it will your real name on Facebook. Or go out in public and start crying that you should be allowed to publicly read rapists' success stories. Let's see how long you last. Oh wait, your too far too leave the basement you dwell in? Gee what a fucking surprise.
>>3107863
>If you're gonna get mad and start a discussion every time someone says something about censorship or PC cops, you probably shouldn't be here.
This thread:
>Hey look Beer is back in Wario
>WHY DID THEY CHANGE IT THIS IS THE WORK OF SJWs
Personally I couldn't give a shit. If it doesn't change GAMEplay they how doesn't matter.
>Oh they changed some lines in FE? Eh.
>They took bond forming which implores stats and stategic elements? Not cool
![3MdC2vA[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9h1I8lB.jpg "3MdC2vA[1].jpg")
>>3107937
>YOU SHITLORD
im not that anon but you just showed the thread you are undoubtedly insane
tumblr is a better place for you
you wont get triggered there :^)i can see why /vr/ doesnt allow after 2000 now
more underage unstable people like you would show up
>>3107945
theres an sjw sympathizer in every thread about censoring
since this is an unpopular 4chan board im inclined to believe its you every time
just know
you never convince anyone
and no one here agrees with you
>>3105032
> graphics to stay true to the developers’ original vision.
> Uses filters
kek
>>3107950
He's outright saying "Endorsement is a bad thing, but depiction is not to be taken as endorsement".
>>3105032
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH2FfGFcp-I
>>3107937
Your first post was this:
>if depicts violence, rape, or extremely violent rape you don't think it should be censored
So it was about depiction in media, not strictly endorsement or actual rapists discussing things publicly.
But yeah sure, people shouldn't be free to talk about crimes anywhere they want where it's unwanted, and there's a reason why rating boards, rules set by publishers, etc. exist.
>>3107945
>>WHY DID THEY CHANGE IT THIS IS THE WORK OF SJWs
No one said that though. One guy here >>3105240 explained the reason why things usually get changed, because companies want o play it safe with some demographics in other countries (including SJWs nowadays as he said). Wario Land 2 wasn't released recently though.
Then this nut went on a rant defending them just because they were briefly mentioned: >>3105254
>>3107976
>because you are well as truly mentally handicapped
>confirmed for so stupid reading big words must be too challenging
>MUCH smarter than you
>he's stupid, you know so much more from browsing one garbage website for 20 years.
>Are you paranoid or something?
>your too far too leave the basement you dwell in? Gee what a fucking surprise.
um im not the anon you were arguing with
im not arguing with you either
im talking about this ad hominem sperg out
i couldnt be arsed to sift through the spergery to find your point
remember this isnt /v/
a simple discussion doesnt need a wall of sperg
my second post implies no butthurt
simply saying its pointless to post stuff like this in every thread
no one will agree so its better to move along
>>3107995
Yeah I should have been more specific. What I meant was extreme violence and rape. Someone getting shot fine, someone getting raped fine, but when it's like watching a fictional character being slowly torn apart (with weapons or a dick) there's a point where it stops being "to represent something" and more "psychopathy wish fulfilment" and there's never anything healthy about pure wish fulfilment because it leads to unrealistic expectations that are incompatible with modern society (i.e. Muslims getting upset the rest of the world isn't like their shithole).
>>3108015
That's exactly my point though isn't it? OP posted something innocuous and someone just had to start crying about SJWs. Maybe it wasn't immediately, maybe it was directly at OP but they just had to perceive the discussion as an attack against themself.
>>3108020
Hey man it's my freedom of expression, don't censor me. If you can't handle some insults you shouldn't be a part of the whole discussions. It's the problem of Gamergate - some guy made claims that what's her face was manipulating people and when a bunch of people started insulting her and the media decided to focus on that rather than address the claims made against her. That's why we'll never be able to ever move past it, the issues were never actually addressed.
>>3108082
thank you autismo
sage
>>3108082
Aw man, since when did enjoying Genesis music make someone austistic? Damn son.
Thank you austimo
