Am I autistic to keep my Pokémon at the exact same level?
no, being autistic is having a level 85 charizard and the rest are all level 30's
>>27131350
I do it, are we both autistic? I do that when I grind before battling gym leaders
>>27131378
I actually played like that for a very long time.
>>27131378
That's not autism. That's just clear-cut laziness.
>>27131350
I do this too. The only difference is my ace must always be 1 or 2 levels higher.
>>27131350
I do the same thing and im autistic as fuck.
are you a NEET also?
>>27131421
practically, but I don't get NEETbux because I live with both of my parents but I can't get a job and very dependent of my parents. I'm 25 and I don't know how to cook.
>>27131419
This. If I have a full 6 party, my most useful is always 3-10 ahead n my just favorite pokemon gets a few ahead as well just from leading the party
I only have 5 party member but I feel like it will trigger me if I add a 6th member that isn't at the same level as the others. I was thinking of getting a Vaporeon since I have no water and it's the nearest water Pokémon I could get by getting the Eevee at Celadon.
>>27131350
Trying to keep your team at roughly the same level isn't autistic, but keeping them at the exact same level is a little autistic.
However, the sensible thing to do if a pokemon is having trouble keeping up is to switch it out for something stronger, unless you're planning on evolving it.
When I was younger I made sure no mons are my team were ever more than 3-4 levels apart from each other
No. It makes good sense from a gameplay perspective. Two pokemon of similar levels should perform similarly, within reason.
>>27131378
How I played when I was 5.
>>27131350
How I play now.
Maybe that answers OP's question.