>30 new Pokemon known so far
>Including evolution lines with the starters, Yungoose, and Pikipek
>Plus the 3 other island guardians
Jesus Christ, they're not planning on revealing this whole fucking Pokedex, r-right?
>"M-Muh 70 new pokes only" meme
Leave
>>26924461
>being a kalosperm
Leave
>>26924461
Nigger, that wasn't what I was implying. I know these games will have a substantial amount of new designs. I was just dreading the possibility of them not leaving us any surprises for the Alola Pokedex
>>26924452
Inb4 200 new Pokémon
>>26924461
>>26924487
This is actually good advice, if your worried that they will end up spoiling the whole dex it might be a good idea to avoid news altogether.
>>26924452
We know there is at least 30 pokemon but we've only seen 18 of them so far. But yeah GF, have a little restraint, unless we are getting 120-150 new mon, in which case, let the torrent continue
>>26924452
I hope they do, sorry
I think we'll get 90-120, remember that GF had to make animations and fix up models for the 649 and all the Formes for Gen 6, especially in Amie.
I wouldn't be surprised if some Gen 6 Mons were scrapped for 7 due to time constraints as a result.
Let's do a comparison according to the months of the year the game came out
January
XY - 5 Pokemon
SM - 0 Pokemon, 4 formes
February
XY - 6 Pokemon
SM - 1 Pokemon, 4 formes
March
XY - 6 Pokemon
SM - 1 Pokemon, 4 formes
April
XY - 6 Pokemon, 1 forme
SM - 1 Pokemon, 4 formes
May
XY - 10 Pokemon, 1 forme
SM - 6 Pokemon, 4 formes
June
XY - 19, 1 forme
SM - 18, 4 formes
>>26924574
I am convinced Cutiefly is one because how can you introduce Fairy-type and not have a Sprite pokemon?
>>26924578
Well when you put it that way, I guess it isn't that bad; especially if only 18 new Pokemon have 'officially' been revealed so far for SM, and not taking in consideration for the obvious evolution lines. You give me hope, anon. Thank you.
