Should there be more sexual dimorphism in Pokemon?
>>26863574
Should we be free to mate with humanoid Pokemon?
>>26863574
Yes
It's as easy as giving the female Pokémon a skinnier waist and/or more pronounced chest, how is this hard
>>26863590
Why is Machoke so damn sexy?
>fighting and psychic for marriage only
Bullshit
>>26863600Forget about the other one. I was confused.
I was thinking more like the Meowstic.
>>26863574
Would be neat, but as long as it's nothing too overboard
>>26863670
True, those are interesting, but it wouldn't be difficult to add subtle figure differences to Pokémon such as Tyranitar
>>26863670
Can't get over how weird male Meowstic looks.
Female looks great though.
>>26864594
Looks much better shiny
>>26863600
It gets kinda hard when you're supposed to do that over 700 times while making sure the concept gets greenlighted.
>>26864633
Despite X and Y's obscenely large models, they barely used any of the 3DS's cartridge capacity. They could easily make more if they really wanted.
>>26864660
GF is l a z y
There's a reason they stopped bothering with minor gender differences after gen IV.
>>26864674
That's the idea, could if they r e a l l y w a n t e d.
>>26863574
Machamp needs feminization.
I dont know why are you so obsessed in oversexualizing everything, they are pokemon not human beings. Its like dogs, theres no our sexual dimorphism in dogs.
>>26864739
It's fine with Pokémon clearly based on animals but it's kinda weird with humanoid stuff like Machamp or Gothitelle.
>>26863600
Sexual dimorphism similar to that in animals would be way more interesting that " fuck it just give this dragon tits and ass"
>>26863574
What a nigger faggot OP is
>>26863574
No.
>>26865611
but we all agree that nobody would be against giving female pokemon tits and ass right?
N I D O R A N
I
D
O
R
A
N
>>26863574
Yes.
>>26863590
No.desu I am ok with this, but furries put me off
>>26863574
I think there should be and have more pokemon like Spinda as well with unique markings.
Giving the Machop line hair would make them sexier too.
>>26865990
That's terrible and I thought the Machop line is lizard based?
>>26866263
Don't bother trying logic with ChinaKitty
>>26865903
More!
>>26863574
Sexual dimorphism only happens in less than 10 percent of all species. If the aim is realism, only 7 pokemon species would exhibit it between its sexes.
>>26865842
No, that's a terrible idea. Yiff in hell.
>>26868956
Your math's a little off there, buddy.
>>26868956
>721*0.1=7
uuh..
I'd fuck afemaleMachamp
>>26863574
I want female Machoke and Machamp to look even more manly than the male ones. They are pokemon so why the hell not.
>>26868970
>>26868988
Oh shit nigger, what am I doing? 72 species would exhibit the traits
>>26865611
Agreed, just like they did with Pyroar.
Female Wobuffet is pretty funny, though.