post the most disturbing hyper realistic pokemon you can >:D
>>26848502
>>26848502
Summer sucks.
>>26848502
I don't think you know what hyper realism means.
That is clearly semi-realism.
>>26848502
I wonder if we can make a regular realistic Pokémon thread and keep Arvalisfags out by pointing them here.
>>26848549
You want more realism, eh? >:}
>>26848560
>hurr durr realistic means shitty grimderp clickbait bait, right?
>>26848549
here
>>26848588
According to Arvalis it is.
>>26848648
Arvalis?
>>26848648
No idea what you're talking about.
>>26848508
hoo is that semen demon
>>26848549
no, its pseudo-realism
>>26848675
Arvalis is an artist who makes "realistic" Pokémon art. He has good drawing skills but he has autistic definitions about what's "realistic" that causes some of his drawings to not remotely resemble the original.
He turned Chandelure into a flying jellyfish, turned Honedge into an insect, turned Trevenant into an octopus that travels on land, turned Gastly into fucking bat, etc.
Every realistic Pokémon thread (actual ones, not bait threads like this) devolves into shitflinging because one of his fans dumps his art and people get into a flame war.
>>26848720
It's not like he claims his drawings are canon. It's just some innocent fan art, nothing worth getting worked up over.
>>26848787
I didn't mean to get worked up and I apologize, I had intended that to just be a snide remark. It just sucks that we can't go a single realistic Pokémon thread without someone shitting it up with his art.
>>26848720
He's still a whole lot less cancerous than garbage like OP. And how is it a problem that he's trying to be creative?
>>26848720
its "realistic" in the sense of using real world physics
gas cannot take form and come to life, nor can inanimate objects
>>26848802
It's your own fault for giving shit taste. You should work on that.
>>26848720
>>26848802
>getting this butthurt because someone draws a pokémon "wrong"
>>26848720
If you actually think his art is bad and not just not how you'd do it, you're autistic. He doesn't just make "realistic drawings of Pokemon" he makes "speculative biological interpretations of Pokemon". It's always the biologists and ecologists in those threads who end up defending his biology and ecology. Sure, they aren't all perfect, but the ones that are good are god-tier speculative biology, given his restrictions. But you guys can't see that, because you know shit about zoology. You see an octopus wearing bark and you say "EVERYBODY KNOWS OCTOPUSSES LIVE IN THE WATER AND WHY IS IT WEARING BARK, THAT'S JUST STUPID" without ever considering that there are answers for your questions.
>>26848845
>>26848828
t. Arvalis
>>26848827
But a bat can emit exactly the same type of gas that Gastly emits?
>>26848502
>>:D
Sweet baby Jesus.
>>26848720
I honestly LOVE his gastly design, I think it's so clever the way he did it. But not all of them are as clever or good. Trevenant is based on a living organism, keep it that organism. it's won't be the first walking plant
>>26848850
It's not "bad" in the sense that it's well-drawn, but it's a shitty way to do "realistic Pokémon" and it doesn't belong in realistic Pokémon threads.
If you wanted to make a "Pokémon changed to biologically and ecologically function" thread then his art would be fine in that context.
Looking through the gallery of this Arvalis cunt, holy shit the cancer of this renditions of fictionary monsters "re-imagined" as just fucking animals with a coat of paint.
Good drawing, but a waste of talent.
>>26848874
But that's another definition of realistic, anon. If we were going by purist definitions, then we would just have life-sized replicas of the Pokemon from the game interacting with a realistic world. Avralis is just the other end of that spectrum. What makes your down-the-middle-and-a-little-to-the-side preference so definitive as to what the term "realistic" should mean? Your argument is disturbingly close to "I don't like it so it sucks", and I really implore you to reconsider.
>>26848879
Some are good, some are bad. Look at/read Giratina>>26848905
, trevenant, or gengar (off the top of my head) for the good shit.
>>26848916
Whoops, didn't mean to stick that quote in the middle.
>>26848508
Hnnnnnggg
>>26848705
I don't think you understand what you are saying.
There's other ways to make a silly design look real, without trying to force a square peg in a round hole.
>>26848827
Pokemon is science-fiction.
>>26848974
Technically true, but the goal of realistic Pokemon is to slide them up the scale of sci-fi hardness.
>>26848502
I don't get this stupid ass threads. How is that "realistic"? A Togepi would like a fucking Togepi, not a fucking nightmare.
>>26848502
> >:D
>Everything must be a ugly boring ass "realistic" animal
FUCK OFF
U
C
K
O
F
F
>>26849167
To be fair that's 2/3rds of Pokemon. Realistic pidgey will never be cool.
>>26849708
Pidgey is cool as fuck, look at those cute ruffly feathers and pink taloncoupled with its determinated and slightly menacing gaze and hint of crest. Such a bold design choice.
Not to talk about how natural the progression of its evolutionary line feels. Even M-Pidgeot is amazing.
>>26848502
>stupid idea
>"disturbing"
>bad art that is in a thumbnail
>">:D"
This bait is so artfully constructed and perfect that it is impossible to take. Too beautifully done, OP.
>>26849746
I said REALISTIC pidgey. It's just take away what made it cool.
(OP)
I didn't make the togepi and I didn't mean to seem like I did. I said to post pic of hyper-realistic pokemon, this wasn't meant to be an art critiquing board, it was just all in good fun. I didn't make the togepi and I don't think thatit was badly made because you can tell that someone worked really hard on it, I don't think that you should judge something that someone obviously worked so hard on like this. that is all
Wait... also dick and balls
I personally hate how virtually every artist who makes realistic Pokémon just ends up ditching the cute and endearing aspects of a Pokémon to make it as grotesque as possible.
Case in point, pic related.
>>26849975
I don't see what you mean...
>>26849846
>>26849914
just fuck off holy shit how can you be this retarded
>>26849975
>>26851725
how the fuck..
half of these are retarded
>>>/out/
>>>/s4s/
>>26851736
He is just a sperg who photoshopped chansey and a red think onto someone elses art to try make a point.
>>26851748
Better than being a sperg who took 2 days to draw the same thing :^)
>>26848502
>>26848560
>>26848699
>>26849975
Off model trash.
>>26850065
see this is good.
on model and fucking horrifying.
>>26848502
scaryyyy
>>26852558
MAGA
