Am I the only person who still thinks of everything after gen 1 as the new pokemon despite gen 2 being more than 15 years ago?
>Am I the only person...
No, you're not.
Still retarded though.
>>26843472
yes
>>26843472
Yes OP, you're the only one you special snowflake. Nobody else thinks that. How cool of you!
>>26843472
please leave and stop shitting up my franchise like you already did with XY, you genwunners will never be pleased
>>26843618
>only 71 new pokemon
>9 of those are starters
>6 are legendaries
Why do Johtofags get shit on so much harder?
>>26843618
No, I like it here. I think I'll keep stay.
>>26843618
I'm not a gen wunner.
I like lots of new pokemon like garchomp and sceptile...
I am just saying I think of everything after gen 1 a new pokemon after all these years..
Maybe it's because we had 151 for so many years.
>>26843738
There was 151 for only 3 years, 2 if you're in America. WTF are you talking about.
>>26843815
Don't new pokemon come out like every year now?
>>26843885
Stop baiting please
Gen 2 doesn't seem new to me anymore, but more novelty since gen 2 pokemon are used less than probably any other gen, since most are shitmon or got evos. I see someone using a Jumpluff or a Lanturn, then it's like "Oh hey, haven't fought one of these in a while."
I still kinda think of gen V pokemon being new, even though they came out six years ago. There's just such a huge number of them that I've never used, it's tough to consider them "old".
>>26843932
Gens IV and below are pretty old to those who started with gen 1 but aren't genwunners
old pokemon
1 - 3
golden age
4, 5
neo pokemon
6+
>>26843932
Age?
>>26843738
>Maybe it's because we had 151 for so many years
gold silver were released 3 years after red green. Youre just exposed more to the first 151 pokemon (justified since gen 1 was the commercial peak and a lot of people kinda left by gen 2)
