Bulbapedia Moves
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
I'm really bothered by this. I like the way Bulbapedia handles moves, it's clean and easy to access but why haven't they edited the Gen 6 levels already? It looks bad. There has to be a reason because it would only take a day.
>>26798038
....? X and Y have different level up sets
>>26798043
XY and ORAS do
>>26798038
>why haven't they edited the Gen 6 levels already
It's a wiki.
If it bothers you, you are the one that is supposed to change it.
At least, if Bulbapedo allows editing.
>>26798107
That's the problem. There has to be a reason why they haven't edited it yet.
>>26798038
This is how it should look like. (There are no official colors yet since the feature doesn't exist)
>>26798107
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Template_talk:Moveentry/Level1
It was actually asked before.
>>26798126
you're hired
>>26798038
they can't do it for some reason
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/User_talk:SnorlaxMonster#Breeding_section_in_move_page
>>26799132
well fuck, so much for that
>>26798038
Hadn't noticed, that's really going to bug me now
>>26799132
I don't see any reason they couldn't do the coding. This means that adding the Gen 7 column would also clutter the template.
>>26799291
I don't know that much about wikis, but I imagine it would mean somebody programming the template, then an admin adding it into the system, rather than just a standard edit, and people are lazy.
It would probably be better if they just added all things in the same gen beneath each other instead of side-by-side.
>>26799317
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Template:Moveentry/Level1&action=edit
I'm no wiki wiz either but I don't think it's impossible. Almost all Bulbapedia template has some next level coding by wikia standards, I don't get why this one is different.
>>26799344
Of course it's not impossible. Anyone with a tiny iota of HTML knowledge could do it
>>26798107
>If it bothers you, you are the one that is supposed to change it.
>At least, if Bulbapedo allows editing.
You do know that Bulbapedo's admins revert pretty much everything remotely bold, right?
>>26800642
I just noticed Satomew2 apparently got banned a while ago for "disrupting editing".
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/User_talk:SatoMew2
He was doing a hell of a good job cleaning up their dumbest errors and fixing garbage translations by their "official translators", often asking for opinions and help on /vp/.
Sasuga Pomf.
Looking back to my edits from last year.
>I changed the "it" on the anime Wooper to "he"
>got reverted because a female Wooper hasn't been seen yet, so it's not officially male
>adding voice actors that are confirmed on other sites
>got reverted because I didn't ask them personally on Facebook
>by 2016 all of those I added are there using the same sources
>remove Clemont's Luxio's voice actor because voice actor confirmed it's not her
>got reverted no questions asked
>turns it wasn't her
>getting rid of redirects
>nah, we use redirects, double redirects sometimes as well
>and now the move entry template
