What went wrong?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
What went wrong?
Nothing.
>>26784699
Design-wise, absolutely fucking nothing. Gharials are cool as hell, even if they're critically endangered.
The transition to model made it a crappy faded maroon instead of an awesome bright red.
Nothing, a diamond in the rough of the shit-ass designs of gen 5
Slightly phallic head withstanding?
Not a thing. Solid as fuck Pokémon.
>>26785832
The faded maroon is more true to concept art, isn't it? Pic related. Though, it seems that the colour tends to vary from the maroon to the red to something in between (eg. from the concept art to the Dream World to the anime; TCG has a bit from all three categories)I think both the red and maroon look just fine, but the red is definitely superior.
>>26786246
80% of Gen 5 designs are fine. More like a representation that the majority isn't as shit as you say.
My favorite Gen V mon. Nothing wrong with it. Game Freak hit it out of the park with design, stats, and moveset.
>>26784699
This isn't the shiny.
The penis nose and baby arms.
In battling, its speed and attack means it misses too many crucial 2hkos to be decent.
>>26784699
Penis nose
>>26784699
Gen 5.
yo dawg we herd you like sunglasses
>>26784699
Its nose isn't a standalone Pokemon.
>>26786410
you heard right dawg
>>26786246
this
>>26786549
ebin
The design is pretty much perfect.
>>26786549
It should be against the rules to agree with retards.
LE GEN 5 IS BAD MEME XD
>>26787878
it is, that's why no one agrees with you.
>>26784699
>wrong
This is one of the few gen V designs I'd not be surprised to see in gen I. And I'm not even a genwunner.
Absolutely nothing, I love this thing. Only Pokemon I intentionally used in BW2 after having already used it in BW.
>When you get that Moxie sweep just right
Krook's on the loose, baby
