Iwanko thread!
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
Don't fuck its evolution(s) GF!
>>26779456
Help! I'm stuck in a magazine!
>>26779479
Don't worry your time will come
I still don't understand how this thing is pure rock type
>>26779600
It would've been a believable Rock/Normal type. I'm assuming the fact it's not means we're not going to get that combination this gen. I don't know what would fit it better in comparison.
I'll fuck it's evolutions
I think they forgot about it. Think we should complain? They obviously don't know how to handle global reveals for this if that is what they were going for. While even the JP official site has not updated for them, the Japanese have still seen them and we haven't.
>>26779640
>Rock/Normal
>daul fighting weakness
Pure Rock is a fine typing anyways.
>>26780061
That typing's viability wasn't even remotely the point of my statement. The point was that we've never had a Rock/Normal type and this would've been a contender for that combination.
>>26779456don't fuck his evolutions(), furries!
i want to wanko to the iwanko
Where are the puppers?
>>26779456
>Don't fuck its evolutions
Don't tell me what I can and can't do
I tried to draw a picture of litten and iwanko.
>>26782565
Nice work.
>>26779456
I love the idea that we are getting a Rock type that is not a rock monster
>>26782584
Thx
>>26782565
Kinda excited to use these two during my first playthrough and have them be bros.
The fleshiest of Rock types.
It should be a Normal type.
harumph
>>26782678
And ruin it? Please no
>>26782630
Diancie is not monster. Diancie is cute.
>>26780163
>>26780163
>>26779456
maybe its gonna be that physical eevee people wanted
its evolutions are different gems and minerals
>inb4 SU
Isn't it confirmed Iwanko is basically Gen 7 Lucario? I'm okay with that, Lucario's line is ugly and Zoroark's only had Zorua to save it.
I am really hoping we won't have another Glameow/Purugly situation here.
>>26785245
I don't think a pokemon whose theme is beauty would affect a pokemon whose theme isn't beauty
>>26784862
nooo don't make it bipedal
SEYMOUR
E
Y
M
O
U
R
>>26782969
What I mean is a creature that is made mostly or rock. We've never had a furry rock type.
So let me ask.
Would you take the rock knot?
>>26788188
how smooth is it?
>>26779456
The more I look at this design the more I love it
>>26779640
I was really hoping for Normal/Rock. I'm not fussed about muh competitive, so I'd rather a unique typing.
Besides, imagine if Tyranitar was a gen 7 mon and we found out its typing before the game out. None of us could predict how good it'd end up.
>>26779640
Normal/X types were a mistake
