Are you excited for Kangaskhan Royale, /vp/?
This shit is going to be great, especially if it lets you battle with randoms on battle spot. Imagining getting in a battle with two americans and teaming up and bullying the lone jap.
>>26736310
this. it's gonna be fun to bully weaklings that think their shit don't stink
>>26736244
With just the most cursory look at how games like MtG have in-and-out rules they could have avoided making the battle royale not a crybaby fest where it's optimal to gang up on someone.
Like at the start of each turn before you pick a move, you are informed that your pokemon is now facing off against (random target of the 3). Boom, problem solved, could actually be fun for more than 5 minutes then.
>>26736244
>Moltres Royal Battle
This is going to run shit on the original 3DS is it?
>>26736244
>4 hot Kangamilfs all over each other
All my yes
Also that one on the right is the only shiny one, why? Is she the dom of the four?
>>26736379
actually it's going to be new3DS exclusive
>battle royal
>four Wobbuffets
>tfw it's going to be removed next gen like Wonder Launcher and Sky Battles
>>26736633
>four Kakuna/Metapod
>four Wailord
>>26736244
you mean Salamence Royale
>>26736244
Battle Royal: Ruiner of Friendships
>>26736244
Wait what is this? Was this in the Treehouse? I only just saw this.
Does anyone have a link to the Treehouse showcase?
>>26736659
Is there anyone who would complain about losing Sky Battles, at all? The only thing it did was ruin half the flying animations forever until they make new models, since they aren't fixing them in Gen 7.
>>26736762
>4 way metronome
>>26736310
This is why you faggot muricans keep getting bodied at VGC.
>>26736589
What the fuck?
>>26736310
>connection was lost
>>26737845
You mean new animations.
Salamence flies like that in the anime, btw. It also makes sense for it to fly given its line's Pokedex entries.
>>26737976
>>You mean new animations.
Which they didn't make for Gen 7 despite numerous complaints. They're going to be too lazy to re-animate them until they have to animate new models, I guarantee it.
>>26737720
>tfw there will be battles where three assholes gang up on the fourth chap.
I'm not sure if we shall rejoice or worry.
>>26737940
>believing it actually would be
You're better than that anon
>>26736244
Earthquake royale.
>that stray shiny kanga on the right.
Ok i laughed.
>>26738505
[SLAPPING SOUNDS]
>>26736244
>Implying Kangaskhan means anything in the gen 7 power creep environment.
>1 trainer vs. 1 trainer, each with one pokémon
>2 trainers vs. 2 trainers, each with one pokémon
>1 trainer vs. 1 trainer, each with two pokémon
>1 trainer vs. 1 trainer, each with three pokémon
>1 trainer vs. 1 trainer, each with three pokémon, but only one can be used during a turn
>1 trainer using one pokémon vs. 5 wild pokémon
>1 trainer vs. 5 trainers, each with one pokémon
>4 trainers against each other, each one with 1 pokémon
What's next?
>>26736244
MY DARKRAI WILL DARK VOID YOU ALL AND EVEN IF U HAVE A DARKRAI MY ESPEON WILL VOID YOU BACK WITH BOUNCE ABILITY GET FUCKT !!!!
BATTLE ROYALE = WORLD TOURNEMENT CONFIRMED GET HYPE !!!!!
NINTENDO WON E3 2016 !!!
>>26738505
>trainers standing at the back
>tfw Wailord's size is dex accurate
>>26738505
>https://youtube.com/watch?v=9U_o-OR62NI
>>26738505
There's always that shiny faggot
>>26736633
>STILL liking golem
>>26736244
>2 trainers vs 2 trainers, each with one pokemon
Tag Battles were introduced in MIDDLE of G3.
>>26738831
It's a 1v1v1v1, not a 2v2.
