So, we've all been trying to find out what the new type triangle is going to be, mostly unsuccessful. But since Rowlet, Litten, Popplio and Iwanko all "hide a secret" they have to be connected in some way. So what if we iclude Iwanko and make it a type square instead of a triangle? Now it actually works. The only unfortunate thing is that Litten has to be fighting for it to work, but there is a very high chance it's going to be fighting anyway, so we'll be disappointed either way.
I gave each of them a type that makes sense to me. Rowlet keeps Flying, Litten gets Fighing, Popplio gets Ice and Iwanko doesn't get a second type.though if it would get one I'm guessing Ground
Now everyone has a type that is strong against one of the others.
Thoughts?
Fire Fighting AND Water Ice? This is the worst square I've seen, and I think you messed up the arrows around Flying and Rock
>>26720809
No we won't. This is incredibly stupid.
It's legit going to be just a mega evolution or synchro evo
>>26720809
But anon, Rock is neutral against a fire/fighting thus breaking the perfect square.
>>26720873
fuck
Anon tries it: Theory crafting
>>26720873
Rock is also SE against Grass/Flying
Actually, Fire/Fighting is super effective on all three of them.
>ice
haha no
Rowlet: Grass/Flying
Litten: Fire/Ground
Popplio: Water/Fighting
Iwanko: Rock
>>26720969
iwanko is weak against all of them then...kek
Are we all just going to ignore the first trailer we saw were the professor only presented the 3 starters?
This is retarded. No way will it be Fire/Fighting again. Fire/Dark is shit but at least it has never been a starter type before.
Why is Iwanko part of this? Hes not a starter
>>26721284
>>26721483
>not reading the op to figure out why it's there
>>26721491
>some random pokemon has something in common with the starters
>lol guys 4 starters xDD
>>26721510
>where did I ever mention that it is a starter
>>26721562
>Why did I decide to force my fan theory down everyone's throat?
>>26721599
dude just hide the thread
