Missed Opportunity
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
I missed the newsletter for these faggots last month. Can any of my /vp/eeps help a man out?
>>26698448
ask reddit
>>26698448
Sent!
I never used mine. What are you going to do for them?
>>26698613
I'll post my feminine cock and soles.
>>26698593
I've never been to reddit and I'm sure as shit not about to start today.
>>26698628
ew dude that's gross
>>26698613
Do for them? Not a thing.
>>26698637
just trying to help poor shitstains like OP to some legendaries.
But I'll do anything for nudes so I can give you what you want
>>26698646
Anon pls ;_;
>>26698656
Why the insults? Only asking a favour.
>>26698683
I'm not insulting you. I'm making an objectively correct observation.
I'll settle for selfies in just underwear though. Since you probably don't have the guts to show us your feminine penis
>>26698655
Then why should I give them to you?
>>26698448
I haven't used mine. Do you happen to have an extra Darkraifor them?
>>26698750
can I steal them from OP? I'm really willing to see OPs feminine penis.
>>26698729
Not the entitled anon that won't do anything for a cool event, but I have a careful Immunity Gligar a Jolly Pawniard, a Jolly Kangaskhan, among other viable competitive mons and several trade evos and stone evos (if you need them for your dex).
>>26698704
shitstain =/= insult?
Your parents must have really done a number on you.
>>26698782
Entitled? How so? I'm not making demands of anyone. I'm not claiming these ARE mine and I SHOULD have them. Only asking.
>>26698783
it's only an insult if you make it one. It's not since it's an evidently correct observation made.
I'm giving you the opportunity to keep your undies on, that's really as far as I'm willing to go. I'm not sure why you're so against this.
>>26698768
as long as you share the pics, i'm fine with it
>>26698832
Well... You're expect people to give you a really valuable pokemon and you're not willing to do anything for it... That seems like the dictionary definition of entitlement.
>>26698832
You're not making any offers, you're literally just asking for them
>>26698782
I already I have a living dex and i already have all my competitive mons trained
>>26698851
"Valuable Pokemon" There is your mistake. These have no value.
>>26698782
I don't see why you couldn't have just taken a pic of what they asked for already, it's like 3 minute work at most, seems like a fairly good deal imo
>Just inject it :^)
>>26698851
He didn't even say he expects it. He is just asking.
God this board is retarded. If I had some extra ones I'd give them to you, OP.
But you're dumb to make a thread on this board for anything. This place is full of retards, just get them yourself and save yourself the trouble.
>>26698875
>Legendary Pokemon not available in ORAS through conventional means
>With Hidden Ability
How is this not valuable?
>>26698911
more than that, it's a limited run since it's through unique codes
>>26698896
I appreciate there is a civilized individual amongst you. I knew I was rolling the dice here.
>>26698887
>>26698782
this, just take the selfy, this board is anonymous for Arceus sake
>>26698911
Ones and zeroes, dude. They are free. I have them already just missed the HA distribution. Shall I continue?
>>26698931
have an articuno OP:
E632CLEYS6JMZND5
>>26698448
>Windows 10
>768p
>Google Chrome
>VLC
>explorer pinned
No, fuck you, you deserve it.
>>26699003
If you say so
>>26699003
How else am I going to listen to my music?
>>26699056
Don't try to bait me again. If that is true, stream on SC or use downloaded shit on foobar2000 like a good memer.
>>26699070
>soundcloud
way to invalidate yourself
>streaming
yeah because paying for music is about as retarded as using VLC
You seem kind of nice though with the spoonfeeding, even if it's mostly wrong advice.
I'd use Foobar if I could get it to look like Winamp, the only thing I dislike about Winamp is that I can't sort on date (only year) so that if an artist releases multiple albums a year they don't line up chronologically. I use foobar for my musepack files though
>>26699003
Autism.
So OP, did you get the articuno and do you still want the other two?
>>26699178
>yeah because paying for music is about as retarded as using VLC
SoundCloud is free and is a stream site. Now it just went pure jew with preview, but until that it was GOAT.
Foobar is a simple as fuck program to listen your shit, but if you care about asthetics then yeah, foobar isn't for you. One friend uses another program to listen his weeb shit, maybe its winamp or something similar, but I don't care about the image, just funtionality.
Hope you liked my blog, hit the upvote button and suscribe for more.
>>26699378
>SoundCloud is free and is a stream site.
Yes I am well aware of that. So suggesting it is utterly retarded. Notice how I didn't put them in the same category. SC in itself is utter garbage. And only the paid streaming services are even worth mentioning for obvious reasons. But even using those would be a stupid waste of money.
>it was goat
not sure how something with that bitrate can ever be goat. Convince me. Hell the bitrate is even worse than YTs audio bitrate. And YT is a video sharing site.
>functionality
I'm not sure how aesthetics aren't part of functionality. Everything you see in my blog-post pic related has a function.
>>26699437
SC was goat for that, if you don't have a good pair of headphones, you won't mostly notice the shitty bitrate, and I used to complement foobar with SC, because most songs can be downloaded just from there at orginal bitrate. But I turned a lazy cunt last year and stopped downloading.
>>26699494
>SC was goat for that
for what?
>good headphones
Even through dollar-store ear-pieces you can hear SC's shitty bitrate.
>I'm lazy so I'll ruin my ears with shitty music
Streamers retort in general. In this sense blaming OP for using VLC/W10 etc is hypocritical.
>>26699534
because of that*
>just because I do only one (1) wrong thing I must be hypocrite
>>26699573
>because of that
Because of what?
>>just because I do only one (1) wrong thing I must be hypocrite
I quite literally never said this. But you're implying there's a degree to hypocrisy; as if the number being an arbitrary high would classify you as a hypocrite. That's a non-sequitur. You're a hypocrite. That's all there's to it. Also, there's quite literally nothing wrong with weeb-music.
>>26699640
>Also, there's quite literally nothing wrong with weeb-music.
I've never said that there's nothing wrong with weeb shit.
>>26699673
Ah, I drew my conclusion from the adjective 'shit', wari wari
>>26699723
I'm trying Clementine and Wenamp. I'll go back to listen downloaded shit again. Your posts will fix my shit taste.
