Haha I told you Duckers
>>26620703
Post yfw they never release AZ's floette and they give light of ruin to Magearna instead
>>26620703
Clearest evidence its gen 7
>New Region
>New Pokemon
>New Mechanics
Lets see how youll move the goal post this time
>>26620703
>Duckers
quack quack, shitposter.
>>26620750
Stop. Feeding. Trolls.
Sage, hide, move along.
>>26620750
>>New Mechanics
nope
>>26620799
>trainers and onlookers during battle
>synchro
(you)
>>26620828
>>trainers and onlookers during battle
that's an aesthetic choice. It has nothing to do with mechanics.
>synchro
Oh, so primals were a """new mechanic""" too?
>>26620703
We already won.
New Pokémon = new Generation of Pokémon.
>>26620836
>that's an aesthetic choice. It has nothing to do with mechanics.
Oh, you've already played SM then. Tell us more about it, faggot.
>""""""lots of quotes""""""
synchro obviously works for all stages of an evolutionary line. Unlike mega/primal, faggot.
For further proof:
>>26620853
See that, faggot.
![2016-06-04-3[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/TtaJu5V.png "2016-06-04-3[1].png")
You can call it gen 7 all you want, but it's pretty obvious that this is a gen 6 game they're marketing as gen 7 to make more money. XY only had 72 pokemon because they were saving the other half of the dex for SM.
>>26620853
>We already won.
Are seriusly thinking about it as of a "win"? It was obvious since the announcement
>>26620864
This was literally the dumbest comment I've read, you are an idiot.
>>26620853
how many people would call emerald a new gen if it had munchlax but nothing else?
>Oh, you've already played SM then. Tell us more about it, faggot.
This argument goes both ways retard.
>synchro obviously works for all stages of an evolutionary line
No. Ash Greninja. Not Ash Frogadier or Ash Froakie.
>>26620864
(you) are a fucking moron
>>26620868
so are (you), faggot
>>26620864
They are tricking the casuals. Glad I'm not the only one who understands
>>26620889
>He hasn't seem how synchro works a la Pokken
Wow, keep sucking dick, fag.
>>26620863
>synchro obviously works for all stages of an evolutionary line.
No it doesn't. There isn't even anything to suggest this being a possibility
>>26620864
Well they certainly were planning Sun and Moon since XY days (hence the souvenir) and its likely Z never was in plans and Zygarde stuff will find some ending in Sun and Moon
But that still is gen 7, not 6.5
>>26620908
Play pokken, (you) moron.
Seriously how are 6.5fags still around?
kill yourself with the rest of your pathetic group
>>26620836
>>26620799
we get a bracelet that gives certain pokes a third typw
no synchro shit
that seems like a new mechanic to me
>magearna's arm opens up into a laser cannon
whaaaaat
cool
>>26620936
it was never revealed, keep telling yourself that
>>26620927
That isn't Synchro Evolution you faggot. That's Synergy, and I never even said anything about 6.5 calm your tits.
>>26620908 read >>26620904
>>26621002 read >>26620994
>>26620911
still 6.5
>>26621018
half rounds up.
it's still 7
looks like a dog dick lol
>>26620936
>He still belives that guy, even though he was debunked when the trailer came out
>>26621059
how does that even remotely look like a dog dick?
>>26620703
>>26621018
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>6.5
FUCK
YOU
GODDAMN IT WOULD STILL BE GEN 6 STOP TRYING TO THINK THAT THERE'S MUCH MORE THAN JUST HOPE TO THE S/M IS GEN 6 ARGUMENT
>>26620703
The weapon was based off of Floette's Eternal Flower. Magearna's arm cannon is based off of a lily. (Also, Lillie probably will end up doing something with Magearna due to that.)
>>26621092
because that's what it looks like lol
>>26620747
Don't say that anon :'{ Accepting the potential truth is going to hurt my soul.
>>26621117
>The weapon was based off of Floette's Eternal Flower.
Yeah, Lysandre's name basically means lily as well.
>Magearna's arm cannon is based off of a lily.
As well as Lillie's name obviously meaning lily.
Just saying these things.
I haven't seen a single person say what this obviously means... Magearna IS AZ Floette or at least a shell/pokeball that it lives inside of.
We will most likely get AZ Floette as an event for XY and ORAS just before SM's release and transferring it to SM will somehow allow you to obtain Magearna in SM
>>26621159
No, that wouldn't make sense.
Wasn't Magearna made by AZ? It was made 500 years ago, while AZ's Floette left him 3000 years ago.
>>26621174
Where did u get that AZ made Magearna?
>>26621181
I've not paid attention to the anime or movies in like forever.
>>26621190
Has anyone? Does that matter?
>>26621147
Zinnia is also a type of flower
>>26621181
to be fair it seems pretty likely AZ made Magearna.
>>26621222
To be fair, you seem like a fag
>there are people who are legit convinced of this gen 6.5 shit
Fucking kill yourselves.
>>26621242
There are NO GENS ANYMORE!
Why does no one get this? From now on ALL games will connect to one another and new Pokemon will come out every year
Didn't someone on staff say the future of Pokemon/the 20th anniversary involved flowers? All these lily connections... AZ's Floette, the Ultimate Weapon, Magearna's cannon, Lysandre, Lillie...
>>26621265
You're fucking retarded and you shouldn't be posting.
>>26621277
Yes, they did.
>it all comes together
This finale's gonna be fucking amazing
>>26621297
Are you serious!? People STILL believe generations are a thing non-ironically? Am I the only rational minded person on here (I mean I kind of figured I was but really!?)
>>26621310
>it all comes together
on "things that will never happen"
>>26620799
We're getting double type moves. That's something.
>>26621332
clearly you do not understand the definition that is used when people say "Generation" in Pokemon.
its not about when the games come out you fucking retard
>>26621350
so gen6? Thx for denying Gen7
>>26620703
No, the clearest evidence of S/M being GENERATION SIX (VI) (6) (NO POINT FIVE) is that it runs on the same engine as XY/ORAS and the pentagon indexes/P. Zygarde's chest colors telling us that S/M were planned from the very start.
That is ONLY it, you meme.
Mostly everything else is subjective, like story/plot/lore and connections like that.
Stay the fuck skeptic, ALL of you memes.
>>26620703
Clearest evidence of Gen 3.5
>>26621350
>Dual type moves
Referring to Solgaleo's move, right? No, that is most likely Steel type.
Anyway, Hawlucha wants a word with you.
>>26621415
>if it uses the same engine its the same generation
you're just as retarded as the people saying 6.5
>>26621350
Flying press. Exists already
>>26621351
Did I say that?
All I'm saying is that there will no longer be hard lines to define a "generation" everything will flow together.. Each game will have loose ends to be tied together in the next
New Pokemon will be released continuously and added as either DLC or events
Story lines will not end but continue over several games over several years
We live in a world where hard lines between generations don't need to exist due to the ever growing technology we have and Pokemon can be discovered in real time like species are in the real world rather than in structured chunks of 100 or so at a time
>>26621446
Evidence, you goddamn dense fuck.
We haven't seen enough to debunk it, either.
>>26621415
Fuck off with this gen garbage!
>>26621469
>my made up bullshit in my head is evidence
Ok.
>>26621467
you literally mentioned that there were no more generations and that games would come out every year and be connected. That was your point.
again, you're fucking retarded and should stop posting.
>>26621498
Really? Should I stop posting? Cause I love taking advice from fags that want to fuck cartoon animals on a chink board you fucking cunt
>>26621222
It was not Da Vinci that made Magearna through "Mystery Science"."Mystery Science" is just another word for alchemy.
>>26621524
moved on to baseless ad hominem I see.
You fags only encourage 6/6.5fags by replying. Sage and hide the threads. Without attention, they die. Simple stuff.
>>26620889
Munchlax wasn't in Emerald
>>26621498
>made up
I didn't make Sun and Moon? What are you even saying? Look at the trailers, it is obviously the same engine, you even said so yourself just a moment ago.
It's evidence no matter what. It can be discarded if we see battle mechanic changes, such as 4 to 5's transition changing Wish and Sturdy's mechanics.
Also, regular evolutions to older mons instantly verify gen 7, as it will screw with Eviolite and make it totally incompatible with XY/ORAS.
>>26621546
You lost me with your dumb fucking 4chan lingo
I don't understand your retarded internet langue and I don't plan to learn it... Have fun sucking cartoon dick
>>26621600
wow....
kill yourself.
>>26621588
yes the fantasy that you have in your head that if it uses the same engine its the same gen is completely made up...by you...in your head...
>>26621630
Nice fucking argument, I bet you didn't even read what I wrote. That's some dedication.
Read through what I said and maybe you'll just be able to try comprehend what's being said and you could possibly understand that I didn't say "x means IT IS A THING".
Evidence is evidence, proof is proof.
LISTEN AND BELIEVE, I guess. I'm leaving. Goodnight.
>>26621630
Oh shit you got me! I guess I have to kill myself now
That's a bummer I was hoping I wouldn't have to kill myself but the anon that's arguing about a children's game knows better
>>26621686
good job storming off like a 5 year old when you don't get your way because you were told that you're wrong.
I read what you wrote and just because you think thats how generations work, doesn't mean that it is. Sorry kid, but you're fucking retarded.
>>26621697
irony.
>>26621723
>just because you think thats how generations work, doesn't mean that it is
I never said that. Now you can fuck off with your shitty bait. I've always gone full egas on these threads anyway, so don't accuse me of "but you're baiting", you goddamn moron.
>>26621723
>>26621774
"It's evidence" =/= "It's a thing"
>>26620703
>the houses topple over like dominoes rather than being smashed into pieces
fucking why
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGTSGiZfIhU
Never ever.
>>26620703
>>26621132
L-lewd!
You guys cant be this retarded. Its clear as water that SM will be the "GSC" to XY. They will complete each other despite SM being a new gen.
>>26622462
but SM will be battle and trade with XY and ORAS so it's more like BW2 than GSC.
>>26620889
>how many people would call emerald a new gen if it had munchlax but nothing else?
There are at least 14 confirmed new Pokémon counting the starter evos and the official site's description of Alola says "many" never-before-seen Pokémon live there. Even if we humored your stupid "it's not a new gen if there are less than X new Pokémon" maymay for a second I'm pretty sure whatever arbitrary number you had in mind doesn't qualify as "many".
>>26620936
I like how you ignore all ops other, more solid points and instead latch onto the only questionable one.
>>26620936
Oops meant to reply to >>26620836
>>26622814
you didn't answer the question.
>>26622914
OK, what do you consider a new gen. Considering you're dismissing new starters, new legendaries, new normal pokemon, new region and new characters as a new gen I guess we're still in gen 1.
>>26622480
No they cant
>>26622462
Slowpoke, meowth, genger and Salamance. Keep thinking GF will pander to that trash gen
Who the fuck set up the criteria for generations in the first place? Imho, if it's a place we've never explored before, it's a new gen. Engines don't mean shit, especially considering the obviously future-proofed models GF invested in. We will be on some variant of the engine for a long time, imho.
>>26620864
You can call it gen 2 all you want, but it's pretty obvious that this is a gen 1 game they're marketing as gen 2 to make more money. RB only had 150 pokemon because they were saving the other half of the dex for GS.
>>26623457
>different sprites
>gen 1 had second highest number of pokemon of any gen introduced
Try harder, bud.
>>26623450
Honestly, until recently the gen borders were relatively defined. Retards just keep moving the flagpost.
>>26623494
>implying different sprites makes it a new generation
So Red/Green and Red/Blue(US) were different generations then?
>most of the pokemon introduced into gen 2 were scrapped pokemon from gen 1
How is that any different from
>most of the pokemon introduced into gen 7 were scrapped pokemon from gen 6
??
>>26620703
Who cares if it is gen 6.5 or 7? It doesn't matter
>>26620703
It's clearly styled as a flower. Not the death weapon stage of box legendaries.
>>26623542
New pokemon starters defines a new gen. There you go, problem solved.
Also, don't give me that bullshit that yellow is a new gen because pikachu. I mean original, new Pokemon starters. Pikachu was introduced in RBG so it doesn't count.
>>26623565
Yes it does. New gens always sells better, Nintendo will market it as gen 7, but in reality it is gen 6.5!
Nintendo=capitalists pigs
>>26623457
>only had 150 pokemon
>only
>150
>>26620750
I think it's something like Gens I and II, but in reverse. Gen VII is going to be the groundbreaker, whilst Gen VI was more of a technical advancement/add-on to the series instead of a substantial milestone, if that makes sense.
>>26623542
>So Red/Green and Red/Blue(US) were different generations then?
no because they're compatible.
>How is that any different from
because gen 6 only had 72 pokemon.
