Mathfags Needed
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
Let's assume that the 1% completed is 3 Pokemon already seen. That would obviously mean that there is a total of 300 Pokemon overall. However, three slots remain to be unlocked.
There are 4 total islands in this region. One of which is called Melemele. We know this because the first slot translates to Alola, which just sums up every Pokemon on each island.
So if there is 300 Pokemon over all, which includes old ones, we're looking at 75 Pokemon per island ( 300 / 4 islands ) But how many NEW Pokemon are we getting exactly?
We can't decide that with the tiny amount of information we have. Even if we assume the older gen mons we have seen in the trailers are in the Dex there are still about 285-290 free spots, all of which could be technically new Pokémon.
Only if we knew when 2% is.
You made an error.
If we assume that 1% is rounded, that means that the true value ranges from 0.5-1.4%, which gives us a possible range of 214-600 Pokemon.
There is also no way to predict how many of those are new. Each Island Dex is likely to be a mixture of new and old.
>>26619825
>But how many NEW Pokemon are we getting exactly?
That's impossible to tell, no matter whether you're a mathfag or not. We could have the starters, evos, and the few other pokemon we've seen and that's it. We won't know how many until we're told, or the games come out.
>>26619825
Considering that number most likely started at 1% with 1 pokemon seen due to rounding and the fact they wouldn't have it as 0% ever, and no idea when it jumps to 2% you cant really make any conclusions from that pic.
>>26619896
It may even be 1.9%, which would mean around 158 pokemons.
there will be 109 new pokemon
>>26620130
By the same token, it may round up from 0.1%, or even lower, which gives us no feasible cap for the upper bound. Because of that, I chose to use normal rounding rules.
Taking that into account, though, we can conclusively say that there are at least 158 Pokemon in the region.
>>26620209
I didn't take into account the upper bound because as other people said, we probably wouldn't ever see 0%.
>>26620130
>>26620209
>158
>>26620391
158 pokemons on the dex doesn't mean 158 new pokemons if that is what you are trying to say.
45 new pokemon
Have fun with another shit gen full of megas
>>26620130
>>26620209
3/151 is 1.99%, which could still theoretically be rounded down. Therefore, the actual lower bound is 151.
>>26620421
>158 pokemons on the dex doesn't mean 158 new pokemons if that is what you are trying to say
I-I was..
>>26619825
Bump for interest
>>26620502
Maybe half that if we are lucky.
