The Japanese youtube channel of Pokemon posted a series of short videos covering the trailer we got. That's where it comes from.

>>26613209
So the Pokeballs move. What's the big deal?

>>26613463
some anon thought the placement of the pokeballs might have something to do with the size of those still-unknown pokemon

>>26613491
Makes sense, but how do we know they are supposed to represent the evolutions?

>>26613611
it was shown in the pokedex video on the pokemon website showing off the rotom stuff

the circles represent the evolutions because they come after them in the pokedex

>>26613611
They are in line with the starters. That is kinda how the pokedex works.

>>26613633
>>26613636
Solid proof would be if they were scrolling through the pokedex entries in the video and the Pokeball positions changed when they got to the next registered Pokemon.

>>26613660
This. People have been taking this shit for granted. I need to track down the video to see what it actually looks like in motion.

Something even more solid would be if other dex entries are shown to have one or no Pokeballs next to them. Right, it like of just looks like people are trying to decipher wallpaper.

>>26613209
>>26613686
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc03tXikfJs
Here's the video. Given how they're static behind each seen/registered Pokemon, I'm willing to give a bit more credence to the theory. We still really have no idea how their position really relates to size or spacing at all, though.

>>26613686
>>26613660
To think otherwise is just reaching at this point
it should be obvious considering the pokeballs aren't in the same positions on each starter they move for a reason stop being in denial