Fossil Thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
I want more Dinosaurs, a Triceratop or a Raptor would be ideal but whatever is fine.
>>26548223
I mean we got Bastiodon...
>>26548248
yeah but he doesn't have the distinct Tricera facial silhouette
>>26548157
>>26548223
I would be pleased with a stegosaurus ankylosaurus or dimetrodon. But any dino done right is welcomed.
>>26548353
>stegosaurus
>dimetrodon
these would be great, I think Torterra is quite similar to a ankylo
>>26548248
Bastidodon
whoa
Typing that, I just realized it's not
>bass-DEE-doe-DON
it's actually
BASS-tee-oh-DON
Bastiodon. Damn.
Anyway, he was an ugly mistake. Not sure what the fuck they were thinking with that thing.
We just had dinos, so I'm up for some more obscure stuff like a rock/fighting Chalicothere (basically a horse gorilla)
>>26548157
Thank you anon(s) for making fossil threads a regular thing.
>>26549330
I'm hoping for this as well. I also wouldn't mind more archaelogical/anthropology based pokemon.
- Spinosaurus
- Deinonychus
- Triceratops
- Megatherium
- any sauropod that doesn't suck
>>26548157
I want a prehistoric pig pokemon. Or at least a pig pokemon that's part rock. Being a rock mono-type pokemon trainer is tough. Here's hoping against all hope that Litten's final evo is part rock. I don't care about the weaknesses I want a rock cat pokemon.
Sabertooth fossil pokemon when?
>>26551794
I mean I'd argue Mamoswine fits that bill, but I get what you mean.
I've taken a liking to the Avatar training method over pure mono type runs, just for added variance.
>>26551901
Mamoswine is Ice/Ground and is based off a Mammoth not really a prehistoric pig. Though the previous evolutions are based on truffle pigs and warthogs so I get why they wouldn't make another one.
I like your "Avatar" approach though. I always do monotype runs though.
>>26552143
Its a giant pig, that's like a mammoth, but not a mammoth. That's close enough for GF really.
Here's the sheet, still pretty restrictive but has enough wiggle room so you don't gotta import.
>>26548394
>he was an ugly mistake
you're a mistake
>>26552447
That's actually really cool. I may do that from now on. I loved the Avatar series.
And you're right. We will probably never get a proper prehistoric pig.
>>26548223
how about they give us a proper pterosaur before they do more dinosaurs
>>26552447
Do you also do a nuzlocke with these rules? If so, how did it work out?
>>26552844
Nuzlocking would be incompatible with these rules, since you gotta get specific typings.
Plus perma-death doesn't add difficulty anyway.
What would be a good Rock-Poison fossil?
>>26553519
I would think a "Laophis" would work well. Basically a giant venomous snake.
>Gen 1: Trilobite and Nautilus, and a pterodon
>Gen 2
>Gen 3: plant, sea scorpion
>Gen 4: Ceratops & pachycephlosaurus
>Gen 5: Proto-avian & ancient sea turtle
>Gen 6: Tyrannosaurus & brachiosaurus
>>26553519
Titanoboa.
I guess a Laophis/Titanoboa would be the most probable if a bit boring. Unless they pulled out all the stops to make it stand out.
I really liked Cradily/Lileep so I wouldn't mind more plants, maybe some megaflora like a Venus fly trap.
I also loved Relicanth and would adore a Megalodon shark. Or a prehistoric crab so I can have a bro for Kingler.
>>26554004
A gen of aquatic fossil mons could be cool. Lots of nice choices. I'd love to see a dunkleosteus.
>>26554004
The funny thing about Cradilly/Lileep is that they're actually worms, not plants.
Last thread someone said a Dunkleosteus would be a good evolution for Relicanth, and I'm inclined to agree.
>>26553764
>pterodon
its not even close to being one
>>26554518
What would you call aerodactyl?
>>26554350
>>26554490
I like the dunkleosteus Relicanth idea. I wouldn't mind more aquatic fossils this gen either.
>>26554549
a dragon that's loosely based on a pterosaur
>>26554609
like gee i dunno maybe a PTERODACTYL
>>26554619
yeah but it's not a pteranodon, as it doesn't have the thing on its head or a beak.
>>26554549
>>26554609
>>26554619
their intention probably was a pterodon, its just an incredible inaccurate/outdated depiction of one.
at best its a very early pterosaur that still has a lot of lizard like features
>>26548157
Rampardos best fossil. Kabutops, Tyrantrum, and Carracosta just behind.
>>26554680
Funnily enough there's a genus of pterosaur named Aerodactylus now.
>>26554708
Tyrantrum is the best fossil.
>>26554708
here's a bigger version of that image if you want it
>>26554837
>1,6 and 2,5
wew, thats smaller than I thought
I'm a manlet and have the same height that rampardos
>>26548394
I always used to say it Bastodion
>>26552497
Agreed. I love that it's a big docile goofy looking thing.
