Why it never has had Sugi artwork?
Is this not it?
>>26505328
Xous54
>>26505377
but better than sugimori.
>>26507221
>that shit perspective
It really isn't.
>>26505211
I feel like they wanted it to be what Aegislash is today, but didn't know how to do it.
>>26505328
No. It's fanart.
>>26507943
> but didn't know how to do it.
Impossible. They have to have sketches for created the Pokemon.
So is impossible that they didn't know how to do the artwork of THEIR design
>>26508012
I didn't mean the design, i mean how it's very offensive one side and the other very defensive.
>>26508064
Oh well, that's true.
>>26507943
I always felt the same. Too bad it's never going to be fixed.
>>26507943
That applies to many new concepts in Pokemon. They introduce something novel, its faults become apparent over time, and they rework that concept for something new.
Shaymin's time-and-item based transformation was expanded upon by Hoopa.
Meloetta's mid-battle transformation was followed up by Mega Evolution.
Keldeo automatically transforms if it knows Secret Sword, much like Rayquayza needs Dragon Ascent to Mega Evolve.
This also applies to items. Soul Dew is a good example - it was overpowered, but limited. The following gen we got similar, lesser items for all mons to use. Also Choice Band, which was introduced a generation prior to Scarf and Specs.
>>26507824
>caring about the designs
nope.
