is this accurate?

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-05-25 18:42:15 Post No. 26471571
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: pokemon gens in a nutshell.png (43 KB, 561x385) Image search: [Google]

43 KB, 561x385

Anonymous 2016-05-25 18:42:15 Post No. 26471571 [Report]

is this accurate?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:00:23 Post No.26471776
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:00:23 Post No.26471776 [Report]

>>26471571
Eyes arent faux angular enough in Gen V

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:01:27 Post No.26471789
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:01:27 Post No.26471789 [Report]

>>26471571
Pretty close, I'd say. Its always hard to pin down an entire generation's design theory into one poke, since all gens have such a wide variety; these would be better with 3 sets of pokes for each gen.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:03:15 Post No.26471809
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:03:15 Post No.26471809 [Report]

>>26471571
Gen I and IV are spot on.
The rest not really.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:06:33 Post No.26471840
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:06:33 Post No.26471840 [Report]

>>26471571
I don't agree with II. Why does it have so big eyes?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:13:53 Post No.26471916
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:13:53 Post No.26471916 [Report]

Gen 4 one looks like gen 6. The gen 4 one should be more straight edged and detailed

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:21:43 Post No.26471988
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:21:43 Post No.26471988 [Report]

>>26471571
No, what the hell is that fucking thing?
Charizard with a jew nose? Piplup with a tumor on its head?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:40:09 Post No.26472197
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 19:40:09 Post No.26472197 [Report]

>>26471988
You're not very bright.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 20:43:24 Post No.26472949
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 20:43:24 Post No.26472949 [Report]

>>26472197
I know what the image is implying, but the drawings are shitty and make for terrible comparisons.