Are you Owlfags STILL adamant that Roothoot will be real?
Get over it. You got BTFO
the wonderful thing about an anonymous image board is when you get BFTO you can switch sides and no one will know. Not even with a distinctive posting style. Isn't that right OP.
>>26420485
Correction
>Are you Roothootfags STILL adamant...
Gotta be politically correct, because technically the Owlfags won. Unless you're a butthurt denialfag who wants to say they're the same people.
>>26420502
funny how there's a distinction now
>>26420485
Calm down. Just because it's still possible that the smug owl is real doesn't mean you have to be upset about owlfags... Just wait till release date denialfag.
>>26420502
a roothoot is a roothoot. you can't say it's only a half
>>26420502
The denialfags were fervently denying the fact that the three pokemon pictured here, were not real. They were correct. They never at any point, said that there would not be a grass owl starter. It was fervently obvious from the trademarks that were filed, that we were getting an owl.
>>26420534
How do I see what trade marks nintendo has filed?
>>26420539
The trademarks I just filed at the agency lists
an owl, a cat, a sea loin, but only ONE OF YOU!
>>26420515
All Roothootfags are Owlfags, but only a small amount of owlfags are roothootfags.
>>26420530
Yes, yes they have.
>>26420534
>It's a crow guys
God, you have seriously gone FULL AUTISM.
>>26420530
>>this distinction is now a serious thing
Denialfags have gone full autism.
Yes, they have.
>>26420549
nice history revisionism owlfag
>>26420577
Nice historic ignorance, denialfag.
>>26420577
What does this even mean? Owlfags won, are you saying they somehow changed the past to manage that? Cuz time travel is impossible my friend.
Is it weird that after the roothoot threads came at large that I now have an urge to find out what roothoot's asshole smells like? I feel like catching a wild owl and then shove rosemary up its ass while furiously sucking the faecal airs from its anus into my lungs.
I don't want to suffer like this...
>>26420609
Uh... Um... I don't even know what to say to this...
>>26420609
Seek help
>>26420609
Therapy
Get therapy anon
>>26420502
>>26420502
>owlfags =/= roothootfags
>>26420887
Yes they do
>>26420579
>>26420513
>>26420502
>>26420549
>dat backpedaling
Going all "m-muh denialfags" confirms you were spamming roothoot images and supporting it as well.
>>26421051
No they don't.
>>26421132
No, no I wasn't. In fact, I was one of the
>yfw, it's an owl, but not roothoot.
Oh, what's that? Owlfag, but not roothootfag? BTFO denialfag.
>>26422442
>implying conjecture means anything
>trying to call someone else's post your own
>still saying anyone against you is a "denialfag" with your unhealthy and embarassing obsession with them
You're fighting a lost battle.
Where was it stated Roothoot and friends where starters? The art dropped out of nowhere but everyone profiled them as starters... For all we know Roothoot could be the second form of Rowlet (same colour, some design aspects, second forme is usually odd, etc) and the other two could be part of the pokedex... Let's just say that neither Those who believed in it and those who denied it are right until the games come out
>>26420515
Sure thing """"""""Henry""""""""
>>26420502
Can't move the goalposts kid.
