>tfw gen 7 will have less than 70 new pokemon
>>26341520
Shit sux desu fampai, games are confurmed FLOP!!!! I buy new pokemon games for NEW pokemon not for dicking around with the same gen 1 slop in different settings
it rhink it's time to evolove them in a fire type company.
>>26341520
Then, I'm not gonna buy it at all.
I didn't buy Pokémon X and Y for this reason.
>>26341520
>>26341551
[citation needed]
>mfw gen 7 will start you out with shitty early region normal types and bugs that you'll box after the first badge
>>26341520
Well,we're going to get 70 new mons,at least let them shine,game freak,and don't do another Jotho/Kalos overshadowing the new ones by old ones,honestly if they're have 70 new mons,but they're all shine,and we have some old mons like 50 i'll be completely fine,but if they're overshadowed like XY,i'll be disapointed
>>26341520
*fewer than 70
>>26341520
Don't care, i still have to try out some Kalos mons, i regret not using a Malamar in my Y team
I do not think they would disappoint like that since now they have a depository of resources to draw from.
>th-there are totally going to be a lot of new Pokemon guys!
>>26341703
>I'm a child that started with BW and has no idea how regional dexes used to work
>>26341520
>over half of them will be water-type
>>26341520
Gen 7 will at least have 79 pokemon.
Not much but better than Kalos and gives us an even 800.
>>26341663
It's better with new Pokémon. And you are slow as hell. Here's a Malamar.
>>26341520
post more maggie
>>26341638
The problem is that it's not even 70 Pokemon you can use since no one ever uses NFE Pokemon.
Gen 6 introduced a great total of 36 Pokemon lines. That's fucking it. It's ridiculous.
That's like 6 different Pokemon teams if you don't want to use repeats.
54
i hope we get 120 new mons,
>>26341585
This. I'm fine with there only being 70-80 new Pokemon if we don't slavishly retread the oldest of waters.
>>26341520
Damn i hope you 're wrong.
>>26341520
I won't mind if we have the same amount of Pokemon introduced as we did in X/Y as long as they are typing combos that haven't been used yet:
Normal/Ice
Normal/Poison
Normal/Bug
Normal/Rock
Normal/Ghost
Normal/Dragon
Normal/Dark
Normal/Steel
Fire/Grass
Fire/Ice
Fire/Poison
Fire/Fairy
Electric/Fighting
Electric/Poison
Electric/Psychic
Electric/Rock
Electric/Dark
Ice/Fighting
Ice/Poison
Ice/Bug
Ice/Steel
Ice/Fairy
Fighting/Ground
Fighting/Ghost
Fighting/Dragon
Fighting/Fairy
Poison/Psychic
Poison/Rock
Poison/Steel
Poison/Fairy
Ground/Fairy
Psychic/Bug
Bug/Dragon
Bug/Dark
Bug/Fairy
Rock/Ghost
Ghost/Fairy
Dark/Fairy
Mega Pokemon, new Pokemon, whatever
ITT: """""People""""" who thinks something a redditor said is confirmed.
GF must introduce substantially more than 72 Pokémon. They can't do this to us two generations in a row. Gen VI only gave us one (shitty) bug type and one poison type. I'd say 100 would be good.
>>26343209
>They can't do this to us
They actually can, anon. They will do if they want. And you know what? No matter how much you sperg on the internet, you will be buying both games and a special edition N3DS, for the good goy you are.
>>26341703
>yfw they used classic designs as placeholder art while working on new designs
>>26342920
What?
>>26341520
We're gonna get ~70 per gen from now out to Gen X where we'll hit 999
Maybe once that happens GF will finally take a risk and do a reboot or something
>>26341703
When will the genwun pandering end
The 3DS can only handle so much.
>>26343522
When faggots finally realise Gen 1 is one of the worst gens and die of a heart attack from being obese.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gi-RYNhP8Y
>>26341703
>Implying they'll immediately show us the new mons in the first trailers
>>26343631
>implying the fat people making those threads three-digit IQ
>>26341520
>mfw gen 7 only has 50 new pokemon and megas get dropped
>>26341703
>all of this gen1 pandering
I dont understand, people who played gen1 games that stopped later WON'T come back to playing for such cheap nostalgia bait, and people who played gen1 games and are still playing today clearly enjoy later seasons enough for this to not be necessary.
WHO ARE THEY AIMING WITH THIS?!
>>26343239
>implying
I didnt buy XY, and i can live with skipping another gen if they pull the same bullshit now.
>>26341520
The one thing that's worse than people making stupid claims from imagined patterns is people who do the same from only one game's precedent.
Why are people thinking this? Odd numbered gens always have a lot of new Pokemon. 1,3,5 all have well over 120.
>>26341983
You play the games seven times over?
>>26343858
>I didnt buy XY
>my parents gave me on my 12th year birthday party
Yeah, no, rly now, anon.
3d models for the old mons are already done, 90% sure gamefreak will put their recycling skills to use
also odd number gens always introduce more pokemon than even ones
