Well?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
You are currently reading a thread in /vp/ - Pokemon
Well?
>>26326537
>based on metascore
Which ones, the critics or the user scores?
FrLg and RBY should be swapped, and BW/BW2 should be switched with XY.
>>26326537
Nostalgia fags ruin everything. The first generation was shit.
Mods, can we get a session of bans right now? This is not a blog.
>>26326537
>>26326566
>The first generation was shit.
At the time it was the best thing ever. And it was done with a tight budget by 3 guys using assembler and in 512 KB. OP's picture is bigger than that. No shit that 20 years and $10 billion dollars later it looks bad compared to the new stuff.
>>26326572
It's based on metascores, hardly related to anything a blog.
>>26326610
>Metascore
>a compilation of opinions
>completely unrelated to personal opinions
How many cellphones did you steal to pay for the internet, nigger?
>>26326704
>consensus is the same as 1 personal opinion
oh my god, the stupid
>>26326735
>oh my god monkeys think they are human
>what are game reviews if not opinions
>>26326537
Anon, Metacritic is just a compilation of opinions.
>Current year
>Being this idiot
>>26326537
>RBY being god tier, instead of Emerald, Platinum, HG/SS, and BW2
Fake!
desu senpai I think BW2 was actually pretty decent.
I was never a fan of the region, but I actually hadfunplaying that game
>>26326537
That's a pretty good list actually, much better than what usually gets posted around here
>pic related, it's OP
>>26326905
>still missing his point
>not a personal opinion
>based on metascores
Pick one.
>REDDIT TIER
OP
>>26326537
Breaking News: OP is a bait flinging fag lord
>>26326977
Is English not your first language?
It's not a personal opinion. It's many personal opinions averaged.
ITT:
>>26326591
>by 3 guys using assembler
Where did you hear this?
>At the time it was the best thing ever.
Not if you played RPGs before it isn't.
>>26327009
>It's many personal opinions averaged
Not even. It's a selection of very specific review sites averaged, most of which are reviews written by people who aren't particularly huge on Pokemon and mostly factor a degree of nostalgia into their opinions.
Stop calling it a "consensus".
>>26327009
>It's not a personal opinion. It's many personal opinions averaged.
So a group of personal opinions.
From people who barely play games let alone pokemon.
Not to mention it represents less than 1/100 of the Pokemon fanbase
What was your point again?
>>26326537
Uh...
>>26327238
>Not to mention it represents less than 1/100 of the Pokemon fanbase
/vp/ represents less than 0,0002% of the fanbase yet people state their opinions as objective facts, your point?
>>26327325
Such as OP?
>btfo
>>26327315
user scores
>>26327337
But that's not OPs opinion
>>26327350
>presenting metascores as facts
>state their opinions as objective facts
>But that's not OPs opinion
>>26326537
BW's metascore is exactly as high as XY'S you fucking mongrel.
>>26327340
who gives a fuck about user scores? Just a bunch of nostalgia and fags that will rate a game high because they can get their fave pokemon in the first 2 minutes.
>>26327340
You're aware that user scores on Metacritic are usually written by the average teenager from Gamefaqs, right?
I mean if you want your "consensus" to be based on the averaged opinions of kids who haven't even graduated high school, be my guest.
>>26326537
>XY that high
>RS that high
>ORAS that high
Close, but no cigar
>>26326537
The filthy masses are wrong. They have no idea how wrong they are.
