>>26280719
Nah, they don't all need one. Although I DO agree that all unevolved starters should only have one type.
Stupid Bulbasaur and Rowlet.

>>26280792
Wait, maybe I misread. Is the question "should they have a second type at all?" Or is it "should they all have a second type?"

No but most fully evolved monotyped starters are boring.

>>26280820
should they have a second type at all. Like how the kalos starters are Grass/Fighting, Fire/Psychic, and Water/Dark.

>>26280853
Oh, well then yeah I think they should. I just don't think they all HAVE to. Starters like Blastoise and Typhlosion don't really fit into another type enough for it to be justified.

>>26280719
Yeah. For many players the starter is first and favorite, or at least a constant in their lineup. More type coverage can only be a good thing.

Also Serperior not getting Dragon typing is a travesty.

yes. single type is boring.

>>26280719
I'm guessing its going to go like this
>water/fightering
>grass/flying
>fire/dark