So wasnt Popplio literally one of the leaked pokemon? There was

Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 5

Anonymous
2016-05-10 12:50:26 Post No. 26233838
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: popplio.png (295 KB, 424x369) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:50:26 Post No. 26233838 [Report]

So wasnt Popplio literally one of the leaked pokemon? There was a deviantart of it and im sure its in the starter leak collage

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:52:26 Post No.26233956
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:52:26 Post No.26233956 [Report]

Yes one of the leaked mons looked almost identical except it was wite and had a detached ball on its nose, it was pretty recent also

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:52:42 Post No.26233971
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:52:42 Post No.26233971 [Report]

>>26233838
I thought it looked familiar.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:53:31 Post No.26234027
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:53:31 Post No.26234027 [Report]

File: owlfags fake confirmed.jpg (196 KB, 1440x899) Image search: [Google]

196 KB, 1440x899

>>26233838
yes

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:54:20 Post No.26234084
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:54:20 Post No.26234084 [Report]

>>26234027
Wow! A seal! Such accurate leaking.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:54:29 Post No.26234091
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:54:29 Post No.26234091 [Report]

File: faaaaakes.png (550 KB, 1024x685) Image search: [Google]

550 KB, 1024x685

>>26233838
This guy had the same body shape, however the details are very different

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:55:27 Post No.26234156
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:55:27 Post No.26234156 [Report]

File: ss+(2016-05-10+at+08.54.28).png (213 KB, 464x388) Image search: [Google]

213 KB, 464x388

the resemblance is uncanny

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:56:44 Post No.26234226
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:56:44 Post No.26234226 [Report]

>>26234091
>>26234156
Better than the real thing desu

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:58:04 Post No.26234284
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:58:04 Post No.26234284 [Report]

>>26234091
This fakes were so much better than the leaked ones.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:58:59 Post No.26234339
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 12:58:59 Post No.26234339 [Report]

>>26234091
This one is cuter...

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 13:00:36 Post No.26234434
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 13:00:36 Post No.26234434 [Report]

>>26234226
>>26234284
>>26234339
that thing looks stupid and overdesigned.
the actual starter is better imo

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 13:02:41 Post No.26234550
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 13:02:41 Post No.26234550 [Report]

seems like some of these 'leakers' may genuinely have seen something, but it was just a silhouette and they filled in the rest in a shitty fashion.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 13:03:59 Post No.26234612
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 13:03:59 Post No.26234612 [Report]

File: image.png (431 KB, 640x1136) Image search: [Google]

431 KB, 640x1136

>>26234339
Yeah no.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-10 13:04:53 Post No.26234665
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-10 13:04:53 Post No.26234665 [Report]

>>26234434
I don't think "overdesigned" is the same as "too detailed"