>>26198206
Once I found three shinies in a row! No one believes me though. ;_; I swear I'm not a hacker. XD

>>26198206
But that is right, technically. The amount of time you can play is fixed, so if you avoid the safari you would have more encounters outside the safari zone. Therefore, higher chance that any shiny you encounter would be in a place easier to catch.

I mean it's a small increase, but still.

>>26198304
The chance of finding a shiny is always the same, even if you were to find 20 in the safari zone.
And the time spent in the safari is not spent following the story so fuck you and your gay theory

>>26198248
Nobody fucking cares.

>>26198304
someone failed statistics in high school

Speaking of the Safari Zone, why was DPPt's so awful?

>>26198322
OK there's no point continuing this conversation until you understand probability. Yes the shiny encounter rate is the same, but if you're less likely to catch Pokemon in the safari zone, that makes the probability of you catching a shiny in your game less likely. That's just a fact.

Clearly it's still a stupid thing to avoid the safari zone entirely though.

>>26198476

Youre surely jesting, negro. DPPt zone was great

>>26198532
>it's still a stupid thing to avoid the safari zone entirely though.
We can agree on that at least.