Both are 10/10 for different reasons, so both.

>>26158619
This. I'm glad they did away with third versions. At least that's what I'm hoping they continue doing since BW2 didn't outsell Emerald or Platinum sadly

Version 2 has more variety of Pokemon including more legendarys

>>26158912
This. Plus better postgame. Fighting every gym leader and Champion with Smogon teams all equal levels

2, I really wish they just made a Gray though.

Both are 10/10 individually, but also complement each other. 10/10 as a whole and all around.

BBVW/BB2VW2 are 11/10.

>>26158598

B2W2 era was comfy as hell. I wish I could go back to 2012

Personally I liked BW more but only because the story was better.
Best gen.
N best boy.

>>26158598
Both. Gen 5 had the best story which is saying something for Pokemon all around, but you'll need to play BW before B2W2 to get a bigger picture.

>>26158598
BW.
Gen was mediocre but a huge step up from the trash that was gen 4.

>>26158619
Unovabortion spotted. Only B2/W2 were good, and they're 9/10, not 10/10.

Both are shit for the same reason, so none.
Who thought giving the fishing rod at the end of the game was a good idea?

>>26158598
Neither.
I'd like to forget them forever but it's hard when they are forgettable by their own.

>>26158923
Third versions sell worser and would only make the first two versions look like cashgrabs. Sequels were a step in the right direction.

>>26159030
Sheep spotted. BW will always be better than 2.

>>26159110
I'm not talking about sales, I just would think a third version would be better.

>>26159110
>worser
No they actually don't. Which is the sad part