Serious Discussion about /vp/
Should we give ourselves ID's like on /soc/ and /pol/?
I would argue yes, it would be very helpful in making giveaways without spamming your email every post. This would also be helpful in the tournaments we have when deciding wether or not to join. Drawthreads would benefit from people just spamming requests and we can see who is actually an artist or not
AND NO MORE OWL SAME FAGGING, per thread..... Not to mention how much "debate" we have here it would really benefit from being able to tell whose who.
What are your thoughts /vp/?
Here's a link to the Strawpoll http://www.strawpoll.me/10115902/
>>26148325
Kill yourself
>>26148325
Fuck off
>>26148325
Fuck that's a small picture my bad
>>26148325
That's not a good idea.
>>26148325
Trips says it all >>26148333 kill yourself OP.
>>26148325
This would do nothing.
>>26148325
I don't feel like IDs are necessary since tripcodes in combination with autofill address most identification issues.
However, I do think the board being spammed by all these fake leaks should be addressed. Whether it falls on the mods to act on them as they would on more pressing rule violations or on us to ignore them with the aid of IDs, something needs to be done about them, since they're a cancer discouraging board activity.
>>26148333
>>26148341
>>26148354
>>26148371
>>26148366
Yet only 3 of you faggots voted No
>>26148422
I'm not voting in your stupid poll. You value discussion so much, read the comments here.
>>26148418
What else can we do but hire more Janitors?
>>26148422
It's such a dumb idea; It's not even worth voting on.
>IDs
>On an anonymous board
it's almost like you shouldn't be here
>>26148467
What is pol? What is soc? Remeber when /b/ had them? Or are you too much of a newfag to know that
>>26148523
So we should aspire to be like /pol/, /soc/, and /b/.
No thanks.
>>26148539
You were just saying there never been and never should be ID'S on a board this is anonymous so no one knows who you are among thread but it's harder to make bait. And making this place less shitty
>>26148571
>You were just saying
That wasn't me. I'm sorry you need IDs to understand that there are multiple people participating in the discussion who might have different views, but most of us get by fine.
The only change this board needs is to stop being a blue board and be red instead.
>>26148598
Congrats, you found an even worse idea than OP's.
>>26148586
I fucking don't know what you're doing...? Are you trying to play me saying I'm samefagging?
>>26148604
>implying that's a bad idea
Fags could have a porn general and stop spamming other threads with it.
>>26148622
Just go to 8 chan I'm sure they have an all Pokegirl shit there
>>26148439
More janitors might solve the problem if they actually act on fake leaks threads, or if a new policy is instated where anything pertaining to fakemons are forced into ONE general and someone making a separate thread for purportedly new mons must have a source (e.g. Serebii) in the OP.
We would require on-the-clock mod activity or some site tool to monitor posting but it would fix things.
>>26148725
At least with ID'S we call out other shit and it's a start
>>26148467
How new are you...? It's was on b? You know the most TEH RANDOMZ