![large[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/7ZfrAek.jpg "large[1].jpg")
If there was a Magic type, (which there should not be, because it is a dumb idea,) what would its type effectiveness be? What moves/mons would be retyped?
![4217-Unown-Q[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/1LpoNJP.png "4217-Unown-Q[1].png")
>>25844164
Unown, pure Magic, Musharna, Psychic/Magic.
Would Normal be super effective against Magic, or would Magic be super effective on Normal?
>>25844217
Super effective against Normal, although it doesn't resist Normal attacks
Fighting would be immune to it
>>25844164
Psychic and Fairy would be merged into Magic type.
>>25844280
Nevermind, there'd probably be a four way effectiveness circle between Magic, Fighting, Dark, and Fairy, based on the four standard roles of battle (Attacker, Tank, Ranger, and Healer).
>>25844217
Also Sigilyph.
Because what is Sigilyph.
>SE vs ????
>NVE vs Psychic, Fighting, Bug
>Weak to Psychic
>Resists Ghost
It would help if you clarified whether we're talking about stage magic or wizard magic.
SE versus Fighting, Fairy, and Ghost
NVE versus Psychic and Steel
Resists Fairy and Dark
Weak to Psychic and Fighting
