No, it was terrible as it was the first gen. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.

Nah man.

It has the best Pokémon designs but otherwise it doesn't offer anything later gens don't do better.

>>25812034
Eh, there are designs in later gens that are waaaay better than a bunch of the gen 1 designs. Like Volcarona is way better than Exeggcute

>>25812026
Yeah, it wasn't amazing.

File: image.jpg (261 KB, 1094x750) Image search: [Google]

261 KB, 1094x750

I will forever love gen 1 since the series and i started with it but no. Not by any metric other than nostalgia

I had a lot of fun playing gen 1 for the eshop release. Feels like people only parrot the fact it was terrible because it's easier to meme than to think.

File: NIP.jpg (12 KB, 368x449) Image search: [Google]

12 KB, 368x449

We already know what Gen is the best according to /vp/

http://strawpoll.me/7239866/r

Gen 5 masterrace

>>25812282
>http://strawpoll.me/7239866/r
I really did love Gen 5, it really got me back into Pokemon. Definitely has the best designs overall.

There is no best generation of Pokémon.

>>25812282
This anon >>25812208 here. I started with Gen 1, like Gen 5 best

File: Wa.jpg (37 KB, 511x415) Image search: [Google]

37 KB, 511x415

>>25812282
>http://strawpoll.me/7239866/r
gen 5 pulled a surprise victory. I thought it would be gen 3 for sure. At least my fave was top 3.

>>25812594
>surprise
This entire board has a huge boner for Gen 5. /vp/ is filled with hipsters who adore the least popular gen.

Objective:

III = V > I > II > VI > IV

>>25812594
>expecting one of the worst gens to be first
>it ended up being an even worse gen
Why is /vp/ a bunch of hipster cucks?